Explaining Discrimination against Religious Minorities

Roger Finke, Robert R. Martin, Jonathan Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research has documented that religious minorities often face the brunt of religious discrimination. Yet formal tests, using global collections, have been lacking. Building on the religious economy theory and recent work in law and politics, we propose that minority religions face discrimination from the state because they represent unwanted competition for the state supported religion, are viewed as a threat to the state and larger culture, and lack support from an independent judiciary. Drawing on the recently collected Religion and State-Minorities collection on more than 500 minority religions, we find support for each of the propositions, though the level of support varies based on the targets of state discrimination. In general, the support is strongest when explaining discrimination against minority religion's institutions and clergy, but weakens when explaining more general discrimination against the membership.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-416
Number of pages28
JournalPolitics and Religion
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

religious minority
discrimination
Religion
minority
clergy
judiciary
Religious Minorities
Discrimination
threat
economy
Law
politics
lack
Minorities

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Finke, Roger ; Martin, Robert R. ; Fox, Jonathan. / Explaining Discrimination against Religious Minorities. In: Politics and Religion. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 389-416.
@article{6af695815ce14893a2b95b729227fcee,
title = "Explaining Discrimination against Religious Minorities",
abstract = "Research has documented that religious minorities often face the brunt of religious discrimination. Yet formal tests, using global collections, have been lacking. Building on the religious economy theory and recent work in law and politics, we propose that minority religions face discrimination from the state because they represent unwanted competition for the state supported religion, are viewed as a threat to the state and larger culture, and lack support from an independent judiciary. Drawing on the recently collected Religion and State-Minorities collection on more than 500 minority religions, we find support for each of the propositions, though the level of support varies based on the targets of state discrimination. In general, the support is strongest when explaining discrimination against minority religion's institutions and clergy, but weakens when explaining more general discrimination against the membership.",
author = "Roger Finke and Martin, {Robert R.} and Jonathan Fox",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1755048317000037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "389--416",
journal = "Politics and Religion",
issn = "1755-0483",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Explaining Discrimination against Religious Minorities. / Finke, Roger; Martin, Robert R.; Fox, Jonathan.

In: Politics and Religion, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 389-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining Discrimination against Religious Minorities

AU - Finke, Roger

AU - Martin, Robert R.

AU - Fox, Jonathan

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Research has documented that religious minorities often face the brunt of religious discrimination. Yet formal tests, using global collections, have been lacking. Building on the religious economy theory and recent work in law and politics, we propose that minority religions face discrimination from the state because they represent unwanted competition for the state supported religion, are viewed as a threat to the state and larger culture, and lack support from an independent judiciary. Drawing on the recently collected Religion and State-Minorities collection on more than 500 minority religions, we find support for each of the propositions, though the level of support varies based on the targets of state discrimination. In general, the support is strongest when explaining discrimination against minority religion's institutions and clergy, but weakens when explaining more general discrimination against the membership.

AB - Research has documented that religious minorities often face the brunt of religious discrimination. Yet formal tests, using global collections, have been lacking. Building on the religious economy theory and recent work in law and politics, we propose that minority religions face discrimination from the state because they represent unwanted competition for the state supported religion, are viewed as a threat to the state and larger culture, and lack support from an independent judiciary. Drawing on the recently collected Religion and State-Minorities collection on more than 500 minority religions, we find support for each of the propositions, though the level of support varies based on the targets of state discrimination. In general, the support is strongest when explaining discrimination against minority religion's institutions and clergy, but weakens when explaining more general discrimination against the membership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017133615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017133615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1755048317000037

DO - 10.1017/S1755048317000037

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017133615

VL - 10

SP - 389

EP - 416

JO - Politics and Religion

JF - Politics and Religion

SN - 1755-0483

IS - 2

ER -