Explaining gender differences in the white coat effect

Katherine L. Streitel, Jennifer E. Graham, Thomas G. Pickering, William Gerin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To discern whether gender was a unique predictor of the white coat effect (WCE) in a population of normotensives and patients diagnosed with hypertension. Methods: Participants (n=252) underwent a doctor's office visit to have their blood pressure measured. Multiple blood pressure readings were taken by both a research assistant and by the attending physician. In addition, measures of anxiety variables were collected during the visit. Participants then underwent a 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Results: Gender was a significant predictor of the systolic WCE, but, as expected, the effect size was small and was no longer significant when age and BMI were included in the regression model. State anxiety emerged as a significant independent predictor of systolic WCE; however, when household income was included in the model it became the only significant independent predictor (β=0.203, P<0.05), in addition to gender, age, and Bmi. Conclusion: This study suggests that the association between gender and the systolic WCE is small, and likely accounted for by other variables including age, BMI, state anxiety, and household income. Thus, gender may be of limited use in helping identify patients who may be more likely to have WCE or white coat hypertension. Gender differences in this area should be interpreted with great caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalBlood Pressure Monitoring
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Anxiety
White Coat Hypertension
Blood Pressure
Physician Assistants
Office Visits
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Reading
Hypertension
Research
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Streitel, Katherine L. ; Graham, Jennifer E. ; Pickering, Thomas G. ; Gerin, William. / Explaining gender differences in the white coat effect. In: Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 1-6.
@article{8473f373ac5a443a971133959f1a0352,
title = "Explaining gender differences in the white coat effect",
abstract = "Objectives: To discern whether gender was a unique predictor of the white coat effect (WCE) in a population of normotensives and patients diagnosed with hypertension. Methods: Participants (n=252) underwent a doctor's office visit to have their blood pressure measured. Multiple blood pressure readings were taken by both a research assistant and by the attending physician. In addition, measures of anxiety variables were collected during the visit. Participants then underwent a 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Results: Gender was a significant predictor of the systolic WCE, but, as expected, the effect size was small and was no longer significant when age and BMI were included in the regression model. State anxiety emerged as a significant independent predictor of systolic WCE; however, when household income was included in the model it became the only significant independent predictor (β=0.203, P<0.05), in addition to gender, age, and Bmi. Conclusion: This study suggests that the association between gender and the systolic WCE is small, and likely accounted for by other variables including age, BMI, state anxiety, and household income. Thus, gender may be of limited use in helping identify patients who may be more likely to have WCE or white coat hypertension. Gender differences in this area should be interpreted with great caution.",
author = "Streitel, {Katherine L.} and Graham, {Jennifer E.} and Pickering, {Thomas G.} and William Gerin",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833f56c2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Blood Pressure Monitoring",
issn = "1359-5237",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Explaining gender differences in the white coat effect. / Streitel, Katherine L.; Graham, Jennifer E.; Pickering, Thomas G.; Gerin, William.

In: Blood Pressure Monitoring, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining gender differences in the white coat effect

AU - Streitel, Katherine L.

AU - Graham, Jennifer E.

AU - Pickering, Thomas G.

AU - Gerin, William

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Objectives: To discern whether gender was a unique predictor of the white coat effect (WCE) in a population of normotensives and patients diagnosed with hypertension. Methods: Participants (n=252) underwent a doctor's office visit to have their blood pressure measured. Multiple blood pressure readings were taken by both a research assistant and by the attending physician. In addition, measures of anxiety variables were collected during the visit. Participants then underwent a 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Results: Gender was a significant predictor of the systolic WCE, but, as expected, the effect size was small and was no longer significant when age and BMI were included in the regression model. State anxiety emerged as a significant independent predictor of systolic WCE; however, when household income was included in the model it became the only significant independent predictor (β=0.203, P<0.05), in addition to gender, age, and Bmi. Conclusion: This study suggests that the association between gender and the systolic WCE is small, and likely accounted for by other variables including age, BMI, state anxiety, and household income. Thus, gender may be of limited use in helping identify patients who may be more likely to have WCE or white coat hypertension. Gender differences in this area should be interpreted with great caution.

AB - Objectives: To discern whether gender was a unique predictor of the white coat effect (WCE) in a population of normotensives and patients diagnosed with hypertension. Methods: Participants (n=252) underwent a doctor's office visit to have their blood pressure measured. Multiple blood pressure readings were taken by both a research assistant and by the attending physician. In addition, measures of anxiety variables were collected during the visit. Participants then underwent a 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Results: Gender was a significant predictor of the systolic WCE, but, as expected, the effect size was small and was no longer significant when age and BMI were included in the regression model. State anxiety emerged as a significant independent predictor of systolic WCE; however, when household income was included in the model it became the only significant independent predictor (β=0.203, P<0.05), in addition to gender, age, and Bmi. Conclusion: This study suggests that the association between gender and the systolic WCE is small, and likely accounted for by other variables including age, BMI, state anxiety, and household income. Thus, gender may be of limited use in helping identify patients who may be more likely to have WCE or white coat hypertension. Gender differences in this area should be interpreted with great caution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751644719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751644719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833f56c2

DO - 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833f56c2

M3 - Article

C2 - 21178767

AN - SCOPUS:78751644719

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Blood Pressure Monitoring

JF - Blood Pressure Monitoring

SN - 1359-5237

IS - 1

ER -