Explaining the persistence of health disparities

Social stratification and the efficiency-equity trade-off in the kidney transplantation system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do health disparities persist when their previous mechanisms are eliminated? Fundamental-cause theorists argue that social position primarily improves health through two metamechanisms: better access to health information and technology. I argue that the general, cumulative, and embodied consequences of social stratification can produce another metamechanism: an efficiency-equity trade-off. A case in point is kidney transplantation, where the mechanisms previously thought to link race to outcomes—ability to pay and certain factors in the kidney allocation system—have been greatly reduced, yet large disparities persist. I show that these current disparities are rooted in factors that directly influence posttransplant success, placing efficiency and racial/ethnic equity at cross-purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1595-1640
Number of pages46
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume120
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 14 2015

Fingerprint

social stratification
persistence
equity
efficiency
health
social position
health information
cause

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{0232bc5421c54e718e3a0781b82b1ab7,
title = "Explaining the persistence of health disparities: Social stratification and the efficiency-equity trade-off in the kidney transplantation system",
abstract = "Why do health disparities persist when their previous mechanisms are eliminated? Fundamental-cause theorists argue that social position primarily improves health through two metamechanisms: better access to health information and technology. I argue that the general, cumulative, and embodied consequences of social stratification can produce another metamechanism: an efficiency-equity trade-off. A case in point is kidney transplantation, where the mechanisms previously thought to link race to outcomes—ability to pay and certain factors in the kidney allocation system—have been greatly reduced, yet large disparities persist. I show that these current disparities are rooted in factors that directly influence posttransplant success, placing efficiency and racial/ethnic equity at cross-purposes.",
author = "Daw, {Jonathan Kyle}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1086/681961",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "1595--1640",
journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0002-9602",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining the persistence of health disparities

T2 - Social stratification and the efficiency-equity trade-off in the kidney transplantation system

AU - Daw, Jonathan Kyle

PY - 2015/7/14

Y1 - 2015/7/14

N2 - Why do health disparities persist when their previous mechanisms are eliminated? Fundamental-cause theorists argue that social position primarily improves health through two metamechanisms: better access to health information and technology. I argue that the general, cumulative, and embodied consequences of social stratification can produce another metamechanism: an efficiency-equity trade-off. A case in point is kidney transplantation, where the mechanisms previously thought to link race to outcomes—ability to pay and certain factors in the kidney allocation system—have been greatly reduced, yet large disparities persist. I show that these current disparities are rooted in factors that directly influence posttransplant success, placing efficiency and racial/ethnic equity at cross-purposes.

AB - Why do health disparities persist when their previous mechanisms are eliminated? Fundamental-cause theorists argue that social position primarily improves health through two metamechanisms: better access to health information and technology. I argue that the general, cumulative, and embodied consequences of social stratification can produce another metamechanism: an efficiency-equity trade-off. A case in point is kidney transplantation, where the mechanisms previously thought to link race to outcomes—ability to pay and certain factors in the kidney allocation system—have been greatly reduced, yet large disparities persist. I show that these current disparities are rooted in factors that directly influence posttransplant success, placing efficiency and racial/ethnic equity at cross-purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937010758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937010758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/681961

DO - 10.1086/681961

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 1595

EP - 1640

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

SN - 0002-9602

IS - 6

ER -