Exploratory cloud-resolving simulations of boundary-layer Arctic stratus clouds Part I

warm-season clouds

Peter Q. Olsson, Jerry Y. Harrington, Graham Feingold, William R. Cotton, Sonia M. Kreidenweis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two-dimensional simulations of arctic stratus clouds (ASC) were conducted using a sophisticated cloud-resolving model with explicit microphysics and a two-stream radiative transfer model. The effects of varying cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations upon the subsequent cloud and its microphysical, radiative and dynamical structure were studied. In this study CCN concentrations were varied within the ranges found in warm-season arctic boundary layers (ABLs) to produce non-drizzling and weakly drizzling stratus decks. Experiments that included all model physics, no-drizzle, and no shortwave radiation were conducted to elucidate the effects of microphysics and radiation on the simulated stratus. Both simulations that did and that did not include the effects of drizzle showed that the higher CCN concentrations produced a cloud with larger reflectivity and absorptivity, but also produced eddies that were weaker than with lower CCN concentrations. Simulations that included the effects of drizzle showed a similar response to changes in CCN concentrations. Simulations with no drizzle produced nmore vigorous eddies than their drizzling counterparts because cooling due to evaporation below cloud tends to stabilize the ABL. The simulations without the effects of short-wave radiation produced very vigorous eddies that penetrated more deeply into the ABL. In this case, the simulation with higher CCN concentrations produced the most vigorous eddies. This resulted from a subtle interplay of microphysics, radiation and dynamics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-597
Number of pages25
JournalAtmospheric Research
Volume47-48
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1998

Fingerprint

stratus
cloud condensation nucleus
drizzle
boundary layer
eddy
simulation
shortwave radiation
reflectivity
radiative transfer
physics
evaporation
effect
cooling
radiation
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Olsson, Peter Q. ; Harrington, Jerry Y. ; Feingold, Graham ; Cotton, William R. ; Kreidenweis, Sonia M. / Exploratory cloud-resolving simulations of boundary-layer Arctic stratus clouds Part I : warm-season clouds. In: Atmospheric Research. 1998 ; Vol. 47-48. pp. 573-597.
@article{536880ace307472b8714cf9fee49daa9,
title = "Exploratory cloud-resolving simulations of boundary-layer Arctic stratus clouds Part I: warm-season clouds",
abstract = "Two-dimensional simulations of arctic stratus clouds (ASC) were conducted using a sophisticated cloud-resolving model with explicit microphysics and a two-stream radiative transfer model. The effects of varying cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations upon the subsequent cloud and its microphysical, radiative and dynamical structure were studied. In this study CCN concentrations were varied within the ranges found in warm-season arctic boundary layers (ABLs) to produce non-drizzling and weakly drizzling stratus decks. Experiments that included all model physics, no-drizzle, and no shortwave radiation were conducted to elucidate the effects of microphysics and radiation on the simulated stratus. Both simulations that did and that did not include the effects of drizzle showed that the higher CCN concentrations produced a cloud with larger reflectivity and absorptivity, but also produced eddies that were weaker than with lower CCN concentrations. Simulations that included the effects of drizzle showed a similar response to changes in CCN concentrations. Simulations with no drizzle produced nmore vigorous eddies than their drizzling counterparts because cooling due to evaporation below cloud tends to stabilize the ABL. The simulations without the effects of short-wave radiation produced very vigorous eddies that penetrated more deeply into the ABL. In this case, the simulation with higher CCN concentrations produced the most vigorous eddies. This resulted from a subtle interplay of microphysics, radiation and dynamics.",
author = "Olsson, {Peter Q.} and Harrington, {Jerry Y.} and Graham Feingold and Cotton, {William R.} and Kreidenweis, {Sonia M.}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0169-8095(98)00066-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47-48",
pages = "573--597",
journal = "Atmospheric Research",
issn = "0169-8095",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Exploratory cloud-resolving simulations of boundary-layer Arctic stratus clouds Part I : warm-season clouds. / Olsson, Peter Q.; Harrington, Jerry Y.; Feingold, Graham; Cotton, William R.; Kreidenweis, Sonia M.

In: Atmospheric Research, Vol. 47-48, 01.06.1998, p. 573-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploratory cloud-resolving simulations of boundary-layer Arctic stratus clouds Part I

T2 - warm-season clouds

AU - Olsson, Peter Q.

AU - Harrington, Jerry Y.

AU - Feingold, Graham

AU - Cotton, William R.

AU - Kreidenweis, Sonia M.

PY - 1998/6/1

Y1 - 1998/6/1

N2 - Two-dimensional simulations of arctic stratus clouds (ASC) were conducted using a sophisticated cloud-resolving model with explicit microphysics and a two-stream radiative transfer model. The effects of varying cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations upon the subsequent cloud and its microphysical, radiative and dynamical structure were studied. In this study CCN concentrations were varied within the ranges found in warm-season arctic boundary layers (ABLs) to produce non-drizzling and weakly drizzling stratus decks. Experiments that included all model physics, no-drizzle, and no shortwave radiation were conducted to elucidate the effects of microphysics and radiation on the simulated stratus. Both simulations that did and that did not include the effects of drizzle showed that the higher CCN concentrations produced a cloud with larger reflectivity and absorptivity, but also produced eddies that were weaker than with lower CCN concentrations. Simulations that included the effects of drizzle showed a similar response to changes in CCN concentrations. Simulations with no drizzle produced nmore vigorous eddies than their drizzling counterparts because cooling due to evaporation below cloud tends to stabilize the ABL. The simulations without the effects of short-wave radiation produced very vigorous eddies that penetrated more deeply into the ABL. In this case, the simulation with higher CCN concentrations produced the most vigorous eddies. This resulted from a subtle interplay of microphysics, radiation and dynamics.

AB - Two-dimensional simulations of arctic stratus clouds (ASC) were conducted using a sophisticated cloud-resolving model with explicit microphysics and a two-stream radiative transfer model. The effects of varying cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations upon the subsequent cloud and its microphysical, radiative and dynamical structure were studied. In this study CCN concentrations were varied within the ranges found in warm-season arctic boundary layers (ABLs) to produce non-drizzling and weakly drizzling stratus decks. Experiments that included all model physics, no-drizzle, and no shortwave radiation were conducted to elucidate the effects of microphysics and radiation on the simulated stratus. Both simulations that did and that did not include the effects of drizzle showed that the higher CCN concentrations produced a cloud with larger reflectivity and absorptivity, but also produced eddies that were weaker than with lower CCN concentrations. Simulations that included the effects of drizzle showed a similar response to changes in CCN concentrations. Simulations with no drizzle produced nmore vigorous eddies than their drizzling counterparts because cooling due to evaporation below cloud tends to stabilize the ABL. The simulations without the effects of short-wave radiation produced very vigorous eddies that penetrated more deeply into the ABL. In this case, the simulation with higher CCN concentrations produced the most vigorous eddies. This resulted from a subtle interplay of microphysics, radiation and dynamics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031692897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031692897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0169-8095(98)00066-0

DO - 10.1016/S0169-8095(98)00066-0

M3 - Article

VL - 47-48

SP - 573

EP - 597

JO - Atmospheric Research

JF - Atmospheric Research

SN - 0169-8095

ER -