Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study

Matthew McCrudden, Joseph P. Magliano, Gregory Schraw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed methods study was to investigate how relevance instructions influence readers' personal reading intentions, reading goals, text processing, and memory for text. Undergraduates (n=52) were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading relevance instruction conditions that asked them to read from a perspective or to read for understanding. Experimental results showed that information was read slower and remembered better when it was relevant. However, some readers spent more time reading irrelevant information, whereas others spent less time reading this information. Post-reading interviews were analyzed to explain these reading time differences. The interview data indicated that relevance instructions influenced readers' goals and the strategies they used to meet those goals. The data sets were complementary: the quantitative data indicated differences in reading time and recall, and the qualitative data allowed us to explain why these differences occurred. These data revealed three distinct reader profiles within and across conditions, and demonstrate how relevance instructions affect reader goals, processing, and comprehension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-241
Number of pages13
JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

Fingerprint

text processing
Reading
instruction
Interviews
interview
comprehension
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{2fc2637029804146850dde66e86b1b2b,
title = "Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study",
abstract = "The purpose of this mixed methods study was to investigate how relevance instructions influence readers' personal reading intentions, reading goals, text processing, and memory for text. Undergraduates (n=52) were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading relevance instruction conditions that asked them to read from a perspective or to read for understanding. Experimental results showed that information was read slower and remembered better when it was relevant. However, some readers spent more time reading irrelevant information, whereas others spent less time reading this information. Post-reading interviews were analyzed to explain these reading time differences. The interview data indicated that relevance instructions influenced readers' goals and the strategies they used to meet those goals. The data sets were complementary: the quantitative data indicated differences in reading time and recall, and the qualitative data allowed us to explain why these differences occurred. These data revealed three distinct reader profiles within and across conditions, and demonstrate how relevance instructions affect reader goals, processing, and comprehension.",
author = "Matthew McCrudden and Magliano, {Joseph P.} and Gregory Schraw",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "229--241",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Psychology",
issn = "0361-476X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing : A mixed methods study. / McCrudden, Matthew; Magliano, Joseph P.; Schraw, Gregory.

In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.10.2010, p. 229-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing

T2 - A mixed methods study

AU - McCrudden, Matthew

AU - Magliano, Joseph P.

AU - Schraw, Gregory

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - The purpose of this mixed methods study was to investigate how relevance instructions influence readers' personal reading intentions, reading goals, text processing, and memory for text. Undergraduates (n=52) were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading relevance instruction conditions that asked them to read from a perspective or to read for understanding. Experimental results showed that information was read slower and remembered better when it was relevant. However, some readers spent more time reading irrelevant information, whereas others spent less time reading this information. Post-reading interviews were analyzed to explain these reading time differences. The interview data indicated that relevance instructions influenced readers' goals and the strategies they used to meet those goals. The data sets were complementary: the quantitative data indicated differences in reading time and recall, and the qualitative data allowed us to explain why these differences occurred. These data revealed three distinct reader profiles within and across conditions, and demonstrate how relevance instructions affect reader goals, processing, and comprehension.

AB - The purpose of this mixed methods study was to investigate how relevance instructions influence readers' personal reading intentions, reading goals, text processing, and memory for text. Undergraduates (n=52) were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading relevance instruction conditions that asked them to read from a perspective or to read for understanding. Experimental results showed that information was read slower and remembered better when it was relevant. However, some readers spent more time reading irrelevant information, whereas others spent less time reading this information. Post-reading interviews were analyzed to explain these reading time differences. The interview data indicated that relevance instructions influenced readers' goals and the strategies they used to meet those goals. The data sets were complementary: the quantitative data indicated differences in reading time and recall, and the qualitative data allowed us to explain why these differences occurred. These data revealed three distinct reader profiles within and across conditions, and demonstrate how relevance instructions affect reader goals, processing, and comprehension.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956344877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956344877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956344877

VL - 35

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology

JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology

SN - 0361-476X

IS - 4

ER -