Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery

Christopher D. Witiw, Seyed Alireza Mansouri, Francois Mathieu, Farshad Nassiri, Jetan H. Badhiwala, Richard G. Fessler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality in healthcare is increasingly graded through a patient-centric lens, using reports of satisfaction and self-perceived outcome. Preestablished expectations have been recognized to influence these measures. With this review, we aim to examine the impact of expectations on satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for individuals undergoing elective spine surgery. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to July 2015 for studies examining the relationship between expectations and satisfaction/PROs in the context of elective spinal surgery. Qualitative synthesis centered around three key questions: (1) Does the magnitude of preoperative expectations impact patient satisfaction and/or PRO after surgery? (2) Does the underlying spinal pathology influence this relationship? (3) What is the impact of unmet expectations on satisfaction? A total of 1489 citations were retrieved. Nineteen met our inclusion criteria. These comprised 3383 patients; 3200 had lumbar and only 183 had cervical spine surgery. Three findings prevailed: (1) high preoperative expectations appear to be associated with higher satisfaction and PROs after surgery for focal lumbar disc herniation, but not for lumbar spinal stenosis; (2) patient expectations frequently exceed actual outcome, creating an “expectation-actuality discrepancy” (E-AD); and (3) high-quality studies suggest a larger E-AD portends lower satisfaction. Limitations to the data include heterogeneous study populations and surgical indications, along with the use of non-validated assessment tools, particularly for satisfaction. Our findings highlight the potential importance of establishing realistic expectations prior to surgery and may serve to direct future research efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-30
Number of pages12
JournalNeurosurgical Review
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Spine
Spinal Stenosis
Quality of Health Care
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
MEDLINE
Self Report
Lenses
Libraries
Databases
Pathology
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Witiw, Christopher D. ; Mansouri, Seyed Alireza ; Mathieu, Francois ; Nassiri, Farshad ; Badhiwala, Jetan H. ; Fessler, Richard G. / Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy : a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery. In: Neurosurgical Review. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 19-30.
@article{5bd04cb4f2e4433c8c8060976872bf8a,
title = "Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery",
abstract = "Quality in healthcare is increasingly graded through a patient-centric lens, using reports of satisfaction and self-perceived outcome. Preestablished expectations have been recognized to influence these measures. With this review, we aim to examine the impact of expectations on satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for individuals undergoing elective spine surgery. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to July 2015 for studies examining the relationship between expectations and satisfaction/PROs in the context of elective spinal surgery. Qualitative synthesis centered around three key questions: (1) Does the magnitude of preoperative expectations impact patient satisfaction and/or PRO after surgery? (2) Does the underlying spinal pathology influence this relationship? (3) What is the impact of unmet expectations on satisfaction? A total of 1489 citations were retrieved. Nineteen met our inclusion criteria. These comprised 3383 patients; 3200 had lumbar and only 183 had cervical spine surgery. Three findings prevailed: (1) high preoperative expectations appear to be associated with higher satisfaction and PROs after surgery for focal lumbar disc herniation, but not for lumbar spinal stenosis; (2) patient expectations frequently exceed actual outcome, creating an “expectation-actuality discrepancy” (E-AD); and (3) high-quality studies suggest a larger E-AD portends lower satisfaction. Limitations to the data include heterogeneous study populations and surgical indications, along with the use of non-validated assessment tools, particularly for satisfaction. Our findings highlight the potential importance of establishing realistic expectations prior to surgery and may serve to direct future research efforts.",
author = "Witiw, {Christopher D.} and Mansouri, {Seyed Alireza} and Francois Mathieu and Farshad Nassiri and Badhiwala, {Jetan H.} and Fessler, {Richard G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10143-016-0720-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "19--30",
journal = "Neurosurgical Review",
issn = "0344-5607",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy : a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery. / Witiw, Christopher D.; Mansouri, Seyed Alireza; Mathieu, Francois; Nassiri, Farshad; Badhiwala, Jetan H.; Fessler, Richard G.

In: Neurosurgical Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 19-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy

T2 - a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery

AU - Witiw, Christopher D.

AU - Mansouri, Seyed Alireza

AU - Mathieu, Francois

AU - Nassiri, Farshad

AU - Badhiwala, Jetan H.

AU - Fessler, Richard G.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Quality in healthcare is increasingly graded through a patient-centric lens, using reports of satisfaction and self-perceived outcome. Preestablished expectations have been recognized to influence these measures. With this review, we aim to examine the impact of expectations on satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for individuals undergoing elective spine surgery. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to July 2015 for studies examining the relationship between expectations and satisfaction/PROs in the context of elective spinal surgery. Qualitative synthesis centered around three key questions: (1) Does the magnitude of preoperative expectations impact patient satisfaction and/or PRO after surgery? (2) Does the underlying spinal pathology influence this relationship? (3) What is the impact of unmet expectations on satisfaction? A total of 1489 citations were retrieved. Nineteen met our inclusion criteria. These comprised 3383 patients; 3200 had lumbar and only 183 had cervical spine surgery. Three findings prevailed: (1) high preoperative expectations appear to be associated with higher satisfaction and PROs after surgery for focal lumbar disc herniation, but not for lumbar spinal stenosis; (2) patient expectations frequently exceed actual outcome, creating an “expectation-actuality discrepancy” (E-AD); and (3) high-quality studies suggest a larger E-AD portends lower satisfaction. Limitations to the data include heterogeneous study populations and surgical indications, along with the use of non-validated assessment tools, particularly for satisfaction. Our findings highlight the potential importance of establishing realistic expectations prior to surgery and may serve to direct future research efforts.

AB - Quality in healthcare is increasingly graded through a patient-centric lens, using reports of satisfaction and self-perceived outcome. Preestablished expectations have been recognized to influence these measures. With this review, we aim to examine the impact of expectations on satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for individuals undergoing elective spine surgery. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception to July 2015 for studies examining the relationship between expectations and satisfaction/PROs in the context of elective spinal surgery. Qualitative synthesis centered around three key questions: (1) Does the magnitude of preoperative expectations impact patient satisfaction and/or PRO after surgery? (2) Does the underlying spinal pathology influence this relationship? (3) What is the impact of unmet expectations on satisfaction? A total of 1489 citations were retrieved. Nineteen met our inclusion criteria. These comprised 3383 patients; 3200 had lumbar and only 183 had cervical spine surgery. Three findings prevailed: (1) high preoperative expectations appear to be associated with higher satisfaction and PROs after surgery for focal lumbar disc herniation, but not for lumbar spinal stenosis; (2) patient expectations frequently exceed actual outcome, creating an “expectation-actuality discrepancy” (E-AD); and (3) high-quality studies suggest a larger E-AD portends lower satisfaction. Limitations to the data include heterogeneous study populations and surgical indications, along with the use of non-validated assessment tools, particularly for satisfaction. Our findings highlight the potential importance of establishing realistic expectations prior to surgery and may serve to direct future research efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962675931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962675931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10143-016-0720-0

DO - 10.1007/s10143-016-0720-0

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27053222

AN - SCOPUS:84962675931

VL - 41

SP - 19

EP - 30

JO - Neurosurgical Review

JF - Neurosurgical Review

SN - 0344-5607

IS - 1

ER -