Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies

Marianthi Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Donna Spiegelman, Adam A. Szpiro, Lianne Sheppard, Joel D. Kaufman, Jeff D. Yanosky, Ronald Williams, Francine Laden, Biling Hong, Helen Suh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abstract. Background: Exposure measurement error is a concern in long-term PM2.5 health studies using ambient concentrations as exposures. We assessed error magnitude by estimating calibration coefficients as the association between personal PM2.5 exposures from validation studies and typically available surrogate exposures. Methods. Daily personal and ambient PM2.5, and when available sulfate, measurements were compiled from nine cities, over 2 to 12 days. True exposure was defined as personal exposure to PM2.5 of ambient origin. Since PM2.5 of ambient origin could only be determined for five cities, personal exposure to total PM 2.5 was also considered. Surrogate exposures were estimated as ambient PM2.5 at the nearest monitor or predicted outside subjects' homes. We estimated calibration coefficients by regressing true on surrogate exposures in random effects models. Results: When monthly-averaged personal PM2.5 of ambient origin was used as the true exposure, calibration coefficients equaled 0.31 (95% CI:0.14, 0.47) for nearest monitor and 0.54 (95% CI:0.42, 0.65) for outdoor home predictions. Between-city heterogeneity was not found for outdoor home PM2.5 for either true exposure. Heterogeneity was significant for nearest monitor PM2.5, for both true exposures, but not after adjusting for city-average motor vehicle number for total personal PM2.5. Conclusions: Calibration coefficients were <1, consistent with previously reported chronic health risks using nearest monitor exposures being under-estimated when ambient concentrations are the exposure of interest. Calibration coefficients were closer to 1 for outdoor home predictions, likely reflecting less spatial error. Further research is needed to determine how our findings can be incorporated in future health studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2
JournalEnvironmental Health: A Global Access Science Source
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 13 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exposure measurement error in PM<sub>2.5</sub> health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kioumourtzoglou, M. A., Spiegelman, D., Szpiro, A. A., Sheppard, L., Kaufman, J. D., Yanosky, J. D., Williams, R., Laden, F., Hong, B., & Suh, H. (2014). Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: A pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 13(1), [2]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-2