Expressing clinical reasoning and uncertainties during a Thai internal medicine ambulatory care rotation

Does the SNAPPS technique generalize?

Kittisak Sawanyawisuth, Alan Schwartz, Terry Wolpaw, Georges Bordage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: SNAPPS is a learner-centered approach to case presentations that was shown, in American studies, to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties in the outpatient setting. Aim: To evaluate the SNAPPS technique in an Asian setting. Methods: conducted a quasi-experimental trial comparing the SNAPPS technique to the usual-and-customary method of case presentations for fifth-year medical students in an ambulatory internal medicine clerkship rotation at Khon Kaen University, Thailand. created four experimental groups to test main and maturation effects. measured 12 outcomes at the end of the rotations: total, summary, and discussion presentation times, number of basic clinical findings, summary thoroughness, number of diagnoses in the differential, number of justified diagnoses, number of basic attributes supporting the differential, number of student-initiated questions or discussions about uncertainties, diagnosis, management, and reading selections. Results: SNAPPS users (90 case presentations), compared with the usual group (93 presentations), had more diagnoses in their differentials (1.81 vs. 1.42), more basic attributes to support the differential (2.39 vs. 1.22), more expression of uncertainties (6.67% vs. 1.08%), and more student-initiated reading selections (6.67% vs. 0%). Presentation times did not differ beten groups (12 vs. 11.2min). There re no maturation effects detected. Conclusions: The use of the SNAPPS technique among Thai medical students during their internal medicine ambulatory care clerkship rotation did facilitate the expression of their clinical reasoning and uncertainties. More intense student-preceptor training is needed to better foster the expression of uncertainties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-384
Number of pages6
JournalMedical teacher
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

medicine
uncertainty
medical student
Group
student
Thailand
management
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{308b84206d114a20b7120b53f9c8b735,
title = "Expressing clinical reasoning and uncertainties during a Thai internal medicine ambulatory care rotation: Does the SNAPPS technique generalize?",
abstract = "Background: SNAPPS is a learner-centered approach to case presentations that was shown, in American studies, to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties in the outpatient setting. Aim: To evaluate the SNAPPS technique in an Asian setting. Methods: conducted a quasi-experimental trial comparing the SNAPPS technique to the usual-and-customary method of case presentations for fifth-year medical students in an ambulatory internal medicine clerkship rotation at Khon Kaen University, Thailand. created four experimental groups to test main and maturation effects. measured 12 outcomes at the end of the rotations: total, summary, and discussion presentation times, number of basic clinical findings, summary thoroughness, number of diagnoses in the differential, number of justified diagnoses, number of basic attributes supporting the differential, number of student-initiated questions or discussions about uncertainties, diagnosis, management, and reading selections. Results: SNAPPS users (90 case presentations), compared with the usual group (93 presentations), had more diagnoses in their differentials (1.81 vs. 1.42), more basic attributes to support the differential (2.39 vs. 1.22), more expression of uncertainties (6.67{\%} vs. 1.08{\%}), and more student-initiated reading selections (6.67{\%} vs. 0{\%}). Presentation times did not differ beten groups (12 vs. 11.2min). There re no maturation effects detected. Conclusions: The use of the SNAPPS technique among Thai medical students during their internal medicine ambulatory care clerkship rotation did facilitate the expression of their clinical reasoning and uncertainties. More intense student-preceptor training is needed to better foster the expression of uncertainties.",
author = "Kittisak Sawanyawisuth and Alan Schwartz and Terry Wolpaw and Georges Bordage",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2014.947942",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "379--384",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

Expressing clinical reasoning and uncertainties during a Thai internal medicine ambulatory care rotation : Does the SNAPPS technique generalize? / Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak; Schwartz, Alan; Wolpaw, Terry; Bordage, Georges.

In: Medical teacher, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 379-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expressing clinical reasoning and uncertainties during a Thai internal medicine ambulatory care rotation

T2 - Does the SNAPPS technique generalize?

AU - Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak

AU - Schwartz, Alan

AU - Wolpaw, Terry

AU - Bordage, Georges

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Background: SNAPPS is a learner-centered approach to case presentations that was shown, in American studies, to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties in the outpatient setting. Aim: To evaluate the SNAPPS technique in an Asian setting. Methods: conducted a quasi-experimental trial comparing the SNAPPS technique to the usual-and-customary method of case presentations for fifth-year medical students in an ambulatory internal medicine clerkship rotation at Khon Kaen University, Thailand. created four experimental groups to test main and maturation effects. measured 12 outcomes at the end of the rotations: total, summary, and discussion presentation times, number of basic clinical findings, summary thoroughness, number of diagnoses in the differential, number of justified diagnoses, number of basic attributes supporting the differential, number of student-initiated questions or discussions about uncertainties, diagnosis, management, and reading selections. Results: SNAPPS users (90 case presentations), compared with the usual group (93 presentations), had more diagnoses in their differentials (1.81 vs. 1.42), more basic attributes to support the differential (2.39 vs. 1.22), more expression of uncertainties (6.67% vs. 1.08%), and more student-initiated reading selections (6.67% vs. 0%). Presentation times did not differ beten groups (12 vs. 11.2min). There re no maturation effects detected. Conclusions: The use of the SNAPPS technique among Thai medical students during their internal medicine ambulatory care clerkship rotation did facilitate the expression of their clinical reasoning and uncertainties. More intense student-preceptor training is needed to better foster the expression of uncertainties.

AB - Background: SNAPPS is a learner-centered approach to case presentations that was shown, in American studies, to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties in the outpatient setting. Aim: To evaluate the SNAPPS technique in an Asian setting. Methods: conducted a quasi-experimental trial comparing the SNAPPS technique to the usual-and-customary method of case presentations for fifth-year medical students in an ambulatory internal medicine clerkship rotation at Khon Kaen University, Thailand. created four experimental groups to test main and maturation effects. measured 12 outcomes at the end of the rotations: total, summary, and discussion presentation times, number of basic clinical findings, summary thoroughness, number of diagnoses in the differential, number of justified diagnoses, number of basic attributes supporting the differential, number of student-initiated questions or discussions about uncertainties, diagnosis, management, and reading selections. Results: SNAPPS users (90 case presentations), compared with the usual group (93 presentations), had more diagnoses in their differentials (1.81 vs. 1.42), more basic attributes to support the differential (2.39 vs. 1.22), more expression of uncertainties (6.67% vs. 1.08%), and more student-initiated reading selections (6.67% vs. 0%). Presentation times did not differ beten groups (12 vs. 11.2min). There re no maturation effects detected. Conclusions: The use of the SNAPPS technique among Thai medical students during their internal medicine ambulatory care clerkship rotation did facilitate the expression of their clinical reasoning and uncertainties. More intense student-preceptor training is needed to better foster the expression of uncertainties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924361632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924361632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2014.947942

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2014.947942

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 379

EP - 384

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 4

ER -