Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups: A framing experiment

Michael P. Boyle, Mike Schmierbach, Cory L. Armstrong, Jaeho Cho, Michael McCluskey, Douglas M. McLeod, Dhavan V. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the tension between national security and civil liberties as a backdrop, this study examines responses to news coverage of activist groups. This 2 × 2 experiment presented participants with news stories about government efforts to restrict the civil liberties of an "extremist" individual or group (news frame) advocating for a cause supported or opposed by the respondent (cause predisposition). Willingness to take expressive action was greatest for individual-framed stories about a cause opposed by the respondent and for groupframed stories about a cause supported by the respondent. We contend that when reporters frame stories about extremist groups around individuals, fewer people will speak out in favor of causes they agree with and more will rally against causes they oppose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-288
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

National security
news
cause
experiment
Group
Experiments
reporter
national security
News Stories
Causes
Experiment
Expressive
coverage

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Boyle, Michael P. ; Schmierbach, Mike ; Armstrong, Cory L. ; Cho, Jaeho ; McCluskey, Michael ; McLeod, Douglas M. ; Shah, Dhavan V. / Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups : A framing experiment. In: Journal of Communication. 2006 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 271-288.
@article{72093c3d816d4fb1ae381bcd2a44c9e4,
title = "Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups: A framing experiment",
abstract = "With the tension between national security and civil liberties as a backdrop, this study examines responses to news coverage of activist groups. This 2 × 2 experiment presented participants with news stories about government efforts to restrict the civil liberties of an {"}extremist{"} individual or group (news frame) advocating for a cause supported or opposed by the respondent (cause predisposition). Willingness to take expressive action was greatest for individual-framed stories about a cause opposed by the respondent and for groupframed stories about a cause supported by the respondent. We contend that when reporters frame stories about extremist groups around individuals, fewer people will speak out in favor of causes they agree with and more will rally against causes they oppose.",
author = "Boyle, {Michael P.} and Mike Schmierbach and Armstrong, {Cory L.} and Jaeho Cho and Michael McCluskey and McLeod, {Douglas M.} and Shah, {Dhavan V.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00019.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "271--288",
journal = "Journal of Communication",
issn = "0021-9916",
number = "2",

}

Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups : A framing experiment. / Boyle, Michael P.; Schmierbach, Mike; Armstrong, Cory L.; Cho, Jaeho; McCluskey, Michael; McLeod, Douglas M.; Shah, Dhavan V.

In: Journal of Communication, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.06.2006, p. 271-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups

T2 - A framing experiment

AU - Boyle, Michael P.

AU - Schmierbach, Mike

AU - Armstrong, Cory L.

AU - Cho, Jaeho

AU - McCluskey, Michael

AU - McLeod, Douglas M.

AU - Shah, Dhavan V.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - With the tension between national security and civil liberties as a backdrop, this study examines responses to news coverage of activist groups. This 2 × 2 experiment presented participants with news stories about government efforts to restrict the civil liberties of an "extremist" individual or group (news frame) advocating for a cause supported or opposed by the respondent (cause predisposition). Willingness to take expressive action was greatest for individual-framed stories about a cause opposed by the respondent and for groupframed stories about a cause supported by the respondent. We contend that when reporters frame stories about extremist groups around individuals, fewer people will speak out in favor of causes they agree with and more will rally against causes they oppose.

AB - With the tension between national security and civil liberties as a backdrop, this study examines responses to news coverage of activist groups. This 2 × 2 experiment presented participants with news stories about government efforts to restrict the civil liberties of an "extremist" individual or group (news frame) advocating for a cause supported or opposed by the respondent (cause predisposition). Willingness to take expressive action was greatest for individual-framed stories about a cause opposed by the respondent and for groupframed stories about a cause supported by the respondent. We contend that when reporters frame stories about extremist groups around individuals, fewer people will speak out in favor of causes they agree with and more will rally against causes they oppose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646059508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646059508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00019.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00019.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646059508

VL - 56

SP - 271

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Communication

JF - Journal of Communication

SN - 0021-9916

IS - 2

ER -