Extending the Use of the SCORS–G Composite Ratings in Assessing Level of Personality Organization

Michelle B. Stein, Jenelle Slavin-Mulford, Samuel Justin Sinclair, Wei Jean Chung, Michael J. Roche, Christy Denckla, Mark A. Blais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, 1995b) reliably measures the quality of object relations in narrative material. It assesses 8 dimensions (on a continuum from maladaptive to adaptive) that mediate interpersonal functioning. The 8 dimensions can be averaged to create a global or composite score to represent a person's overall object relational functioning. This study aimed to create levels of personality organization using the SCORS–G global score ratings of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives and to explore the construct validity of these levels using a multimethod approach (i.e., psychopathology, normal personality, and life-event data). Meaningful relationships were found between the SCORS–G level of personality organization and aspects of psychopathology (Personality Assessment Inventory; Morey, 1991), regulation and control (NEO Five-Factor Inventory; Costa & McCrae, 1989, 1992b), and number of psychiatric hospitalizations, suicide attempts, and educational level. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential value of creating levels of personality organization (LPO) using the SCORS–G composite or global ratings as a supplement to the psychological assessment process and further highlights the utility of this measure in the field of personality assessment. Clinical and research-related implications as well as limitations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-175
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2018

Fingerprint

Personality
Personality Assessment
Psychopathology
Thematic Apperception Test
Personality Inventory
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Suicide
Cognition
Psychiatry
Hospitalization
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Object Attachment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Stein, Michelle B. ; Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle ; Sinclair, Samuel Justin ; Chung, Wei Jean ; Roche, Michael J. ; Denckla, Christy ; Blais, Mark A. / Extending the Use of the SCORS–G Composite Ratings in Assessing Level of Personality Organization. In: Journal of Personality Assessment. 2018 ; Vol. 100, No. 2. pp. 166-175.
@article{b27f575e05b54c38b1a6119187fb0f2a,
title = "Extending the Use of the SCORS–G Composite Ratings in Assessing Level of Personality Organization",
abstract = "The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, 1995b) reliably measures the quality of object relations in narrative material. It assesses 8 dimensions (on a continuum from maladaptive to adaptive) that mediate interpersonal functioning. The 8 dimensions can be averaged to create a global or composite score to represent a person's overall object relational functioning. This study aimed to create levels of personality organization using the SCORS–G global score ratings of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives and to explore the construct validity of these levels using a multimethod approach (i.e., psychopathology, normal personality, and life-event data). Meaningful relationships were found between the SCORS–G level of personality organization and aspects of psychopathology (Personality Assessment Inventory; Morey, 1991), regulation and control (NEO Five-Factor Inventory; Costa & McCrae, 1989, 1992b), and number of psychiatric hospitalizations, suicide attempts, and educational level. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential value of creating levels of personality organization (LPO) using the SCORS–G composite or global ratings as a supplement to the psychological assessment process and further highlights the utility of this measure in the field of personality assessment. Clinical and research-related implications as well as limitations are discussed.",
author = "Stein, {Michelle B.} and Jenelle Slavin-Mulford and Sinclair, {Samuel Justin} and Chung, {Wei Jean} and Roche, {Michael J.} and Christy Denckla and Blais, {Mark A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00223891.2016.1195394",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "166--175",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Extending the Use of the SCORS–G Composite Ratings in Assessing Level of Personality Organization. / Stein, Michelle B.; Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle; Sinclair, Samuel Justin; Chung, Wei Jean; Roche, Michael J.; Denckla, Christy; Blais, Mark A.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 100, No. 2, 04.03.2018, p. 166-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extending the Use of the SCORS–G Composite Ratings in Assessing Level of Personality Organization

AU - Stein, Michelle B.

AU - Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle

AU - Sinclair, Samuel Justin

AU - Chung, Wei Jean

AU - Roche, Michael J.

AU - Denckla, Christy

AU - Blais, Mark A.

PY - 2018/3/4

Y1 - 2018/3/4

N2 - The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, 1995b) reliably measures the quality of object relations in narrative material. It assesses 8 dimensions (on a continuum from maladaptive to adaptive) that mediate interpersonal functioning. The 8 dimensions can be averaged to create a global or composite score to represent a person's overall object relational functioning. This study aimed to create levels of personality organization using the SCORS–G global score ratings of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives and to explore the construct validity of these levels using a multimethod approach (i.e., psychopathology, normal personality, and life-event data). Meaningful relationships were found between the SCORS–G level of personality organization and aspects of psychopathology (Personality Assessment Inventory; Morey, 1991), regulation and control (NEO Five-Factor Inventory; Costa & McCrae, 1989, 1992b), and number of psychiatric hospitalizations, suicide attempts, and educational level. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential value of creating levels of personality organization (LPO) using the SCORS–G composite or global ratings as a supplement to the psychological assessment process and further highlights the utility of this measure in the field of personality assessment. Clinical and research-related implications as well as limitations are discussed.

AB - The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, 1995b) reliably measures the quality of object relations in narrative material. It assesses 8 dimensions (on a continuum from maladaptive to adaptive) that mediate interpersonal functioning. The 8 dimensions can be averaged to create a global or composite score to represent a person's overall object relational functioning. This study aimed to create levels of personality organization using the SCORS–G global score ratings of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives and to explore the construct validity of these levels using a multimethod approach (i.e., psychopathology, normal personality, and life-event data). Meaningful relationships were found between the SCORS–G level of personality organization and aspects of psychopathology (Personality Assessment Inventory; Morey, 1991), regulation and control (NEO Five-Factor Inventory; Costa & McCrae, 1989, 1992b), and number of psychiatric hospitalizations, suicide attempts, and educational level. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential value of creating levels of personality organization (LPO) using the SCORS–G composite or global ratings as a supplement to the psychological assessment process and further highlights the utility of this measure in the field of personality assessment. Clinical and research-related implications as well as limitations are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978134295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978134295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2016.1195394

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2016.1195394

M3 - Article

C2 - 27390883

AN - SCOPUS:84978134295

VL - 100

SP - 166

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 2

ER -