External immunity in ant societies

Sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials

Clint A. Penick, Omar Halawani, Bria Pearson, Stephanie Mathews, Margarita Maria Lopez-Uribe, Robert R. Dunn, Adrian A. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number171332
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Ants
Immunity
Insects
Pressure
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Bacteria
Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

Penick, Clint A. ; Halawani, Omar ; Pearson, Bria ; Mathews, Stephanie ; Lopez-Uribe, Margarita Maria ; Dunn, Robert R. ; Smith, Adrian A. / External immunity in ant societies : Sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials. In: Royal Society Open Science. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. 2.
@article{1ff0d1fde8c54b49a2e07eb9e91aa9b6,
title = "External immunity in ant societies: Sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials",
abstract = "Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40{\%} of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure.",
author = "Penick, {Clint A.} and Omar Halawani and Bria Pearson and Stephanie Mathews and Lopez-Uribe, {Margarita Maria} and Dunn, {Robert R.} and Smith, {Adrian A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1098/rsos.171332",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Royal Society Open Science",
issn = "2054-5703",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "2",

}

External immunity in ant societies : Sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials. / Penick, Clint A.; Halawani, Omar; Pearson, Bria; Mathews, Stephanie; Lopez-Uribe, Margarita Maria; Dunn, Robert R.; Smith, Adrian A.

In: Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, 171332, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - External immunity in ant societies

T2 - Sociality and colony size do not predict investment in antimicrobials

AU - Penick, Clint A.

AU - Halawani, Omar

AU - Pearson, Bria

AU - Mathews, Stephanie

AU - Lopez-Uribe, Margarita Maria

AU - Dunn, Robert R.

AU - Smith, Adrian A.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure.

AB - Social insects live in dense groups with a high probability of disease transmission and have therefore faced strong pressures to develop defences against pathogens. For this reason, social insects have been hypothesized to invest in antimicrobial secretions as a mechanism of external immunity to prevent the spread of disease. However, empirical studies linking the evolution of sociality with increased investment in antimicrobials have been relatively few. Here we quantify the strength of antimicrobial secretions among 20 ant species that cover a broad spectrum of ant diversity and colony sizes. We extracted external compounds from ant workers to test whether they inhibited the growth of the bacterium Staphylococcus epidermidis. Because all ant species are highly social, we predicted that all species would exhibit some antimicrobial activity and that species that form the largest colonies would exhibit the strongest antimicrobial response. Our comparative approach revealed that strong surface antimicrobials are common to particular ant clades, but 40% of species exhibited no antimicrobial activity at all. We also found no correlation between antimicrobial activity and colony size. Rather than relying on antimicrobial secretions as external immunity to control pathogen spread, many ant species have probably developed alternative strategies to defend against disease pressure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042767466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042767466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsos.171332

DO - 10.1098/rsos.171332

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Royal Society Open Science

JF - Royal Society Open Science

SN - 2054-5703

IS - 2

M1 - 171332

ER -