External ventricular drain practice variations

Results from a nationwide survey

Griffin R. Baum, Kristopher G. Hooten, Dennis T. Lockney, Kyle M. Fargen, Nefize Turan, Gustavo Pradilla, Gregory J.A. Murad, Robert Harbaugh, Michael Glantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE While guidelines exist for many neurosurgical procedures, external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion has yet to be standardized. The goal of this study was to survey the neurosurgical community and determine the most frequent EVD insertion practices. The hypothesis was that there would be no standard practices identified for EVD insertion or methods to avoid EVD-associated infections. METHODS The American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership database was queried for all eligible neurosurgeons. A 16-question, multiple-choice format survey was created and sent to 7217 recipients. The responses were collected electronically, and the descriptive results were tabulated. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS In total, 1143 respondents (15.8%) completed the survey, and 705 respondents (61.6%) reported tracking EVD infections at their institution. The most common self-reported infection rate ranged from 1% to 3% (56.1% of participants), and 19.7% of respondents reported a 0% infection rate. In total, 451 respondents (42.7%) indicated that their institution utilizes a formal protocol for EVD placement. If a respondent's institution had a protocol, only 258 respondents (36.1%) always complied with the protocol. Protocol utilization for EVD insertion was significantly more frequent among residents, in academic/hybrid centers, in ICU settings, and if the institution tracked EVD-associated infection rates (p < 0.05). A self-reported 0% infection rate was significantly more commonly associated with a higher level of training (e.g., attending physicians), private center settings, a clinician performing 6 to 10 EVD insertions within the previous 12 months, and prophylactic continuous antibiotic utilization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This survey demonstrated heterogeneity in the practices for EVD insertion. No standard practices have been proposed or adopted by the neurosurgical community for EVD insertion or complication avoidance. These results highlight the need for the nationwide standardization of technique and complication prevention measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1190-1197
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of neurosurgery
Volume127
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Infection
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neurosurgical Procedures
Chi-Square Distribution
Databases
Guidelines
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Physicians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Baum, G. R., Hooten, K. G., Lockney, D. T., Fargen, K. M., Turan, N., Pradilla, G., ... Glantz, M. (2017). External ventricular drain practice variations: Results from a nationwide survey. Journal of neurosurgery, 127(5), 1190-1197. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16367
Baum, Griffin R. ; Hooten, Kristopher G. ; Lockney, Dennis T. ; Fargen, Kyle M. ; Turan, Nefize ; Pradilla, Gustavo ; Murad, Gregory J.A. ; Harbaugh, Robert ; Glantz, Michael. / External ventricular drain practice variations : Results from a nationwide survey. In: Journal of neurosurgery. 2017 ; Vol. 127, No. 5. pp. 1190-1197.
@article{3945cd199e344cf894eb1c331951196f,
title = "External ventricular drain practice variations: Results from a nationwide survey",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE While guidelines exist for many neurosurgical procedures, external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion has yet to be standardized. The goal of this study was to survey the neurosurgical community and determine the most frequent EVD insertion practices. The hypothesis was that there would be no standard practices identified for EVD insertion or methods to avoid EVD-associated infections. METHODS The American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership database was queried for all eligible neurosurgeons. A 16-question, multiple-choice format survey was created and sent to 7217 recipients. The responses were collected electronically, and the descriptive results were tabulated. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS In total, 1143 respondents (15.8{\%}) completed the survey, and 705 respondents (61.6{\%}) reported tracking EVD infections at their institution. The most common self-reported infection rate ranged from 1{\%} to 3{\%} (56.1{\%} of participants), and 19.7{\%} of respondents reported a 0{\%} infection rate. In total, 451 respondents (42.7{\%}) indicated that their institution utilizes a formal protocol for EVD placement. If a respondent's institution had a protocol, only 258 respondents (36.1{\%}) always complied with the protocol. Protocol utilization for EVD insertion was significantly more frequent among residents, in academic/hybrid centers, in ICU settings, and if the institution tracked EVD-associated infection rates (p < 0.05). A self-reported 0{\%} infection rate was significantly more commonly associated with a higher level of training (e.g., attending physicians), private center settings, a clinician performing 6 to 10 EVD insertions within the previous 12 months, and prophylactic continuous antibiotic utilization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This survey demonstrated heterogeneity in the practices for EVD insertion. No standard practices have been proposed or adopted by the neurosurgical community for EVD insertion or complication avoidance. These results highlight the need for the nationwide standardization of technique and complication prevention measures.",
author = "Baum, {Griffin R.} and Hooten, {Kristopher G.} and Lockney, {Dennis T.} and Fargen, {Kyle M.} and Nefize Turan and Gustavo Pradilla and Murad, {Gregory J.A.} and Robert Harbaugh and Michael Glantz",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2016.9.JNS16367",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "1190--1197",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "5",

}

Baum, GR, Hooten, KG, Lockney, DT, Fargen, KM, Turan, N, Pradilla, G, Murad, GJA, Harbaugh, R & Glantz, M 2017, 'External ventricular drain practice variations: Results from a nationwide survey', Journal of neurosurgery, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1190-1197. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16367

External ventricular drain practice variations : Results from a nationwide survey. / Baum, Griffin R.; Hooten, Kristopher G.; Lockney, Dennis T.; Fargen, Kyle M.; Turan, Nefize; Pradilla, Gustavo; Murad, Gregory J.A.; Harbaugh, Robert; Glantz, Michael.

In: Journal of neurosurgery, Vol. 127, No. 5, 01.11.2017, p. 1190-1197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - External ventricular drain practice variations

T2 - Results from a nationwide survey

AU - Baum, Griffin R.

AU - Hooten, Kristopher G.

AU - Lockney, Dennis T.

AU - Fargen, Kyle M.

AU - Turan, Nefize

AU - Pradilla, Gustavo

AU - Murad, Gregory J.A.

AU - Harbaugh, Robert

AU - Glantz, Michael

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE While guidelines exist for many neurosurgical procedures, external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion has yet to be standardized. The goal of this study was to survey the neurosurgical community and determine the most frequent EVD insertion practices. The hypothesis was that there would be no standard practices identified for EVD insertion or methods to avoid EVD-associated infections. METHODS The American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership database was queried for all eligible neurosurgeons. A 16-question, multiple-choice format survey was created and sent to 7217 recipients. The responses were collected electronically, and the descriptive results were tabulated. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS In total, 1143 respondents (15.8%) completed the survey, and 705 respondents (61.6%) reported tracking EVD infections at their institution. The most common self-reported infection rate ranged from 1% to 3% (56.1% of participants), and 19.7% of respondents reported a 0% infection rate. In total, 451 respondents (42.7%) indicated that their institution utilizes a formal protocol for EVD placement. If a respondent's institution had a protocol, only 258 respondents (36.1%) always complied with the protocol. Protocol utilization for EVD insertion was significantly more frequent among residents, in academic/hybrid centers, in ICU settings, and if the institution tracked EVD-associated infection rates (p < 0.05). A self-reported 0% infection rate was significantly more commonly associated with a higher level of training (e.g., attending physicians), private center settings, a clinician performing 6 to 10 EVD insertions within the previous 12 months, and prophylactic continuous antibiotic utilization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This survey demonstrated heterogeneity in the practices for EVD insertion. No standard practices have been proposed or adopted by the neurosurgical community for EVD insertion or complication avoidance. These results highlight the need for the nationwide standardization of technique and complication prevention measures.

AB - OBJECTIVE While guidelines exist for many neurosurgical procedures, external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion has yet to be standardized. The goal of this study was to survey the neurosurgical community and determine the most frequent EVD insertion practices. The hypothesis was that there would be no standard practices identified for EVD insertion or methods to avoid EVD-associated infections. METHODS The American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership database was queried for all eligible neurosurgeons. A 16-question, multiple-choice format survey was created and sent to 7217 recipients. The responses were collected electronically, and the descriptive results were tabulated. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS In total, 1143 respondents (15.8%) completed the survey, and 705 respondents (61.6%) reported tracking EVD infections at their institution. The most common self-reported infection rate ranged from 1% to 3% (56.1% of participants), and 19.7% of respondents reported a 0% infection rate. In total, 451 respondents (42.7%) indicated that their institution utilizes a formal protocol for EVD placement. If a respondent's institution had a protocol, only 258 respondents (36.1%) always complied with the protocol. Protocol utilization for EVD insertion was significantly more frequent among residents, in academic/hybrid centers, in ICU settings, and if the institution tracked EVD-associated infection rates (p < 0.05). A self-reported 0% infection rate was significantly more commonly associated with a higher level of training (e.g., attending physicians), private center settings, a clinician performing 6 to 10 EVD insertions within the previous 12 months, and prophylactic continuous antibiotic utilization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This survey demonstrated heterogeneity in the practices for EVD insertion. No standard practices have been proposed or adopted by the neurosurgical community for EVD insertion or complication avoidance. These results highlight the need for the nationwide standardization of technique and complication prevention measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032674645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032674645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16367

DO - 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16367

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 1190

EP - 1197

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 5

ER -

Baum GR, Hooten KG, Lockney DT, Fargen KM, Turan N, Pradilla G et al. External ventricular drain practice variations: Results from a nationwide survey. Journal of neurosurgery. 2017 Nov 1;127(5):1190-1197. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16367