Eyes have they, but they see not

Israeli election laws, freedom of expression, and the need for transparent speech

Amit Schejter, Moran Yemini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A critical-historical description and analysis of the development of the laws regulating electioneering in broadcasting and their interpretation by policymakers and courts over a period of nearly fifty years in Israel demonstrates how the conceptual basis for the regulation scheme originally offered by the law as early as 1959 has been turned on its head. The result is a chaotic system in which the rules of, and the borderline between, the permissible and the forbidden are unclear. While the forbidden is perceived as dead letter, the permitted seems at times to be unrestricted, perhaps because the theory behind it makes it unenforceable. At the same time, there is growing skepticism about the efficacy of the electoral campaigning system as a whole, fostering extreme proposals for reform including proposals to abolish regulation. This study offers an alternative approach, based on a different theory of speech, a theory of transparent speech.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-452
Number of pages42
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 26 2009

Fingerprint

Israeli
election
Law
Chaotic systems
Broadcasting
regulation
electoral system
broadcasting
Israel
reform
interpretation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Law

Cite this

@article{3a7a9eaabb9b44259089d6af8afc3280,
title = "Eyes have they, but they see not: Israeli election laws, freedom of expression, and the need for transparent speech",
abstract = "A critical-historical description and analysis of the development of the laws regulating electioneering in broadcasting and their interpretation by policymakers and courts over a period of nearly fifty years in Israel demonstrates how the conceptual basis for the regulation scheme originally offered by the law as early as 1959 has been turned on its head. The result is a chaotic system in which the rules of, and the borderline between, the permissible and the forbidden are unclear. While the forbidden is perceived as dead letter, the permitted seems at times to be unrestricted, perhaps because the theory behind it makes it unenforceable. At the same time, there is growing skepticism about the efficacy of the electoral campaigning system as a whole, fostering extreme proposals for reform including proposals to abolish regulation. This study offers an alternative approach, based on a different theory of speech, a theory of transparent speech.",
author = "Amit Schejter and Moran Yemini",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/10811680903238043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "411--452",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Eyes have they, but they see not : Israeli election laws, freedom of expression, and the need for transparent speech. / Schejter, Amit; Yemini, Moran.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, 26.10.2009, p. 411-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eyes have they, but they see not

T2 - Israeli election laws, freedom of expression, and the need for transparent speech

AU - Schejter, Amit

AU - Yemini, Moran

PY - 2009/10/26

Y1 - 2009/10/26

N2 - A critical-historical description and analysis of the development of the laws regulating electioneering in broadcasting and their interpretation by policymakers and courts over a period of nearly fifty years in Israel demonstrates how the conceptual basis for the regulation scheme originally offered by the law as early as 1959 has been turned on its head. The result is a chaotic system in which the rules of, and the borderline between, the permissible and the forbidden are unclear. While the forbidden is perceived as dead letter, the permitted seems at times to be unrestricted, perhaps because the theory behind it makes it unenforceable. At the same time, there is growing skepticism about the efficacy of the electoral campaigning system as a whole, fostering extreme proposals for reform including proposals to abolish regulation. This study offers an alternative approach, based on a different theory of speech, a theory of transparent speech.

AB - A critical-historical description and analysis of the development of the laws regulating electioneering in broadcasting and their interpretation by policymakers and courts over a period of nearly fifty years in Israel demonstrates how the conceptual basis for the regulation scheme originally offered by the law as early as 1959 has been turned on its head. The result is a chaotic system in which the rules of, and the borderline between, the permissible and the forbidden are unclear. While the forbidden is perceived as dead letter, the permitted seems at times to be unrestricted, perhaps because the theory behind it makes it unenforceable. At the same time, there is growing skepticism about the efficacy of the electoral campaigning system as a whole, fostering extreme proposals for reform including proposals to abolish regulation. This study offers an alternative approach, based on a different theory of speech, a theory of transparent speech.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350180379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350180379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680903238043

DO - 10.1080/10811680903238043

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 411

EP - 452

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 4

ER -