Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear

H. Mike Kim, Jon Michael E. Caldwell, John A. Buza, Leslie A. Fink, Christopher S. Ahmad, Louis U. Bigliani, William N. Levine

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is widely accepted that most patients treated with rotator cuff repair do well regardless of the integrity of the repair. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to reexamine this concept and identify the factors affecting the outcomes of patients with a recurrent tear. Methods: A cohort of patients who had been treated with rotator cuff repair completed a survey regarding satisfaction with the operatively treated shoulder, physical activity, and shoulder function. Ultrasonography was performed to determine rotator cuff integrity. Patients were divided into three age categories: younger than fifty-five years, fifty-five to sixty-five years, and sixty-six years or older. The relationships of the outcomes to patient age, repair integrity, and other demographic factors were analyzed. Results: Forty-seven (26%) of the 180 enrolled patients had a retear, defined as a full-thickness defect. In each age category, the satisfaction, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), and SST (Simple Shoulder Test) scores in the retear group were significantly poorer than those in the no-retear group (p < 0.05).Within the retear group, all three scores were significantly better in the oldest age category (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences among the age categories within the no-retear group (p > 0.05). Simple regression analysis showed that younger age, a Workers' Compensation claim, and lower education level were significant predictors of poorer scores in patients with a retear (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis of the retear group showed that (1) lower education level and a Workers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer satisfaction score; (2) lower education level, younger age, and aWorkers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer ASES score; and (3) lower education level was the only independent predictor of a poorer SST score (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusions: The presence of a retear negatively affected the clinical outcomes following rotator cuff repair. This finding refutes the widely held concept that patients typically do well regardless of the repair integrity following rotator cuff repair. In patients with a retear, nonanatomic factors including younger age, lower education level, and a Workers' Compensation claim were associated with poorer outcomes. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)106-112
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2014

Fingerprint

Rotator Cuff
Workers' Compensation
Education
Elbow
Regression Analysis
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Tears
Ultrasonography
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Exercise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Kim, H. Mike ; Caldwell, Jon Michael E. ; Buza, John A. ; Fink, Leslie A. ; Ahmad, Christopher S. ; Bigliani, Louis U. ; Levine, William N. / Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2014 ; Vol. 96, No. 2. pp. 106-112.
@article{1e7ce41d457b40e1b2565a4300c978a0,
title = "Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear",
abstract = "Background: It is widely accepted that most patients treated with rotator cuff repair do well regardless of the integrity of the repair. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to reexamine this concept and identify the factors affecting the outcomes of patients with a recurrent tear. Methods: A cohort of patients who had been treated with rotator cuff repair completed a survey regarding satisfaction with the operatively treated shoulder, physical activity, and shoulder function. Ultrasonography was performed to determine rotator cuff integrity. Patients were divided into three age categories: younger than fifty-five years, fifty-five to sixty-five years, and sixty-six years or older. The relationships of the outcomes to patient age, repair integrity, and other demographic factors were analyzed. Results: Forty-seven (26{\%}) of the 180 enrolled patients had a retear, defined as a full-thickness defect. In each age category, the satisfaction, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), and SST (Simple Shoulder Test) scores in the retear group were significantly poorer than those in the no-retear group (p < 0.05).Within the retear group, all three scores were significantly better in the oldest age category (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences among the age categories within the no-retear group (p > 0.05). Simple regression analysis showed that younger age, a Workers' Compensation claim, and lower education level were significant predictors of poorer scores in patients with a retear (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis of the retear group showed that (1) lower education level and a Workers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer satisfaction score; (2) lower education level, younger age, and aWorkers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer ASES score; and (3) lower education level was the only independent predictor of a poorer SST score (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusions: The presence of a retear negatively affected the clinical outcomes following rotator cuff repair. This finding refutes the widely held concept that patients typically do well regardless of the repair integrity following rotator cuff repair. In patients with a retear, nonanatomic factors including younger age, lower education level, and a Workers' Compensation claim were associated with poorer outcomes. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
author = "Kim, {H. Mike} and Caldwell, {Jon Michael E.} and Buza, {John A.} and Fink, {Leslie A.} and Ahmad, {Christopher S.} and Bigliani, {Louis U.} and Levine, {William N.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.L.01649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "106--112",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear. / Kim, H. Mike; Caldwell, Jon Michael E.; Buza, John A.; Fink, Leslie A.; Ahmad, Christopher S.; Bigliani, Louis U.; Levine, William N.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 96, No. 2, 15.01.2014, p. 106-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting satisfaction and shoulder function in patients with a recurrent rotator cuff tear

AU - Kim, H. Mike

AU - Caldwell, Jon Michael E.

AU - Buza, John A.

AU - Fink, Leslie A.

AU - Ahmad, Christopher S.

AU - Bigliani, Louis U.

AU - Levine, William N.

PY - 2014/1/15

Y1 - 2014/1/15

N2 - Background: It is widely accepted that most patients treated with rotator cuff repair do well regardless of the integrity of the repair. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to reexamine this concept and identify the factors affecting the outcomes of patients with a recurrent tear. Methods: A cohort of patients who had been treated with rotator cuff repair completed a survey regarding satisfaction with the operatively treated shoulder, physical activity, and shoulder function. Ultrasonography was performed to determine rotator cuff integrity. Patients were divided into three age categories: younger than fifty-five years, fifty-five to sixty-five years, and sixty-six years or older. The relationships of the outcomes to patient age, repair integrity, and other demographic factors were analyzed. Results: Forty-seven (26%) of the 180 enrolled patients had a retear, defined as a full-thickness defect. In each age category, the satisfaction, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), and SST (Simple Shoulder Test) scores in the retear group were significantly poorer than those in the no-retear group (p < 0.05).Within the retear group, all three scores were significantly better in the oldest age category (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences among the age categories within the no-retear group (p > 0.05). Simple regression analysis showed that younger age, a Workers' Compensation claim, and lower education level were significant predictors of poorer scores in patients with a retear (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis of the retear group showed that (1) lower education level and a Workers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer satisfaction score; (2) lower education level, younger age, and aWorkers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer ASES score; and (3) lower education level was the only independent predictor of a poorer SST score (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusions: The presence of a retear negatively affected the clinical outcomes following rotator cuff repair. This finding refutes the widely held concept that patients typically do well regardless of the repair integrity following rotator cuff repair. In patients with a retear, nonanatomic factors including younger age, lower education level, and a Workers' Compensation claim were associated with poorer outcomes. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Background: It is widely accepted that most patients treated with rotator cuff repair do well regardless of the integrity of the repair. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to reexamine this concept and identify the factors affecting the outcomes of patients with a recurrent tear. Methods: A cohort of patients who had been treated with rotator cuff repair completed a survey regarding satisfaction with the operatively treated shoulder, physical activity, and shoulder function. Ultrasonography was performed to determine rotator cuff integrity. Patients were divided into three age categories: younger than fifty-five years, fifty-five to sixty-five years, and sixty-six years or older. The relationships of the outcomes to patient age, repair integrity, and other demographic factors were analyzed. Results: Forty-seven (26%) of the 180 enrolled patients had a retear, defined as a full-thickness defect. In each age category, the satisfaction, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), and SST (Simple Shoulder Test) scores in the retear group were significantly poorer than those in the no-retear group (p < 0.05).Within the retear group, all three scores were significantly better in the oldest age category (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences among the age categories within the no-retear group (p > 0.05). Simple regression analysis showed that younger age, a Workers' Compensation claim, and lower education level were significant predictors of poorer scores in patients with a retear (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis of the retear group showed that (1) lower education level and a Workers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer satisfaction score; (2) lower education level, younger age, and aWorkers' Compensation claim were independent predictors of a poorer ASES score; and (3) lower education level was the only independent predictor of a poorer SST score (p < 0.01 for all). Conclusions: The presence of a retear negatively affected the clinical outcomes following rotator cuff repair. This finding refutes the widely held concept that patients typically do well regardless of the repair integrity following rotator cuff repair. In patients with a retear, nonanatomic factors including younger age, lower education level, and a Workers' Compensation claim were associated with poorer outcomes. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896305652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896305652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.L.01649

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.L.01649

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24430409

AN - SCOPUS:84896305652

VL - 96

SP - 106

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 2

ER -