Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams

Susan Mohammed, Linda C. Angell

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

We examine the effect of personality heterogeneity on oral vs. written task performance using data collected from 59 process improvement teams (comprising 267 individuals). As predicted, relationships differed depending on the task performed. Higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability and conscientiousness scored better, while teams with higher mean extraversion scored lower on written reports. Whereas mean aggregation of team composition variables resulted in significant effects for written performance, aggregation based primarily on variability resulted in significant effects for oral performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute
Pages2585-2590
Number of pages6
StatePublished - 2002
EventDecision Sciences Institute 2002 Proceedings - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Nov 23 2002Nov 26 2002

Other

OtherDecision Sciences Institute 2002 Proceedings
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period11/23/0211/26/02

Fingerprint

Agglomeration
Chemical analysis
Influencing factors
Quality improvement
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Team composition
Process improvement
Cognitive ability
Task performance
Neuroticism
Conscientiousness

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2002). Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams. In Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 2585-2590)
Mohammed, Susan ; Angell, Linda C. / Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams. Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. 2002. pp. 2585-2590
@inproceedings{e915b07f693f4e31a733c2ea5dbad117,
title = "Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams",
abstract = "We examine the effect of personality heterogeneity on oral vs. written task performance using data collected from 59 process improvement teams (comprising 267 individuals). As predicted, relationships differed depending on the task performed. Higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability and conscientiousness scored better, while teams with higher mean extraversion scored lower on written reports. Whereas mean aggregation of team composition variables resulted in significant effects for written performance, aggregation based primarily on variability resulted in significant effects for oral performance.",
author = "Susan Mohammed and Angell, {Linda C.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "2585--2590",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute",

}

Mohammed, S & Angell, LC 2002, Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams. in Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. pp. 2585-2590, Decision Sciences Institute 2002 Proceedings, San Diego, CA, United States, 11/23/02.

Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams. / Mohammed, Susan; Angell, Linda C.

Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. 2002. p. 2585-2590.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams

AU - Mohammed, Susan

AU - Angell, Linda C.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - We examine the effect of personality heterogeneity on oral vs. written task performance using data collected from 59 process improvement teams (comprising 267 individuals). As predicted, relationships differed depending on the task performed. Higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability and conscientiousness scored better, while teams with higher mean extraversion scored lower on written reports. Whereas mean aggregation of team composition variables resulted in significant effects for written performance, aggregation based primarily on variability resulted in significant effects for oral performance.

AB - We examine the effect of personality heterogeneity on oral vs. written task performance using data collected from 59 process improvement teams (comprising 267 individuals). As predicted, relationships differed depending on the task performed. Higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability and conscientiousness scored better, while teams with higher mean extraversion scored lower on written reports. Whereas mean aggregation of team composition variables resulted in significant effects for written performance, aggregation based primarily on variability resulted in significant effects for oral performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642523200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642523200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:1642523200

SP - 2585

EP - 2590

BT - Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute

ER -

Mohammed S, Angell LC. Factors Influencing the Performance of Quality Improvement Teams. In Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute. 2002. p. 2585-2590