Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit

Jeffrey C. Sandler, Brenda L. Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the academic world, a researcher's number of publications can carry huge professional and financial rewards. This truth has led to many unethical authorship assignments throughout the world of publishing, including within faculty-student collaborations. Although the American Psychological Association (APA) passed a revised code of ethics in 1992 with special rules pertaining to such collaborative efforts, it is widely acknowledged that unethical assignments of authorship credit continue to occur regularly. This study found that of the 604 APA-member respondents, 165 (27.3%) felt they had been involved in an unethical or unfair authorship assignment. Furthermore, nontenured faculty members and women were statistically more likely to be involved in an unethical or unfair assignment of authorship credit than tenured faculty members or men.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-80
Number of pages16
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

Fingerprint

Authorship
Ethics
Students
Codes of Ethics
Reward
Publications
Research Personnel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{eb69254bb30746fd94a155c15a4c13d8,
title = "Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit",
abstract = "In the academic world, a researcher's number of publications can carry huge professional and financial rewards. This truth has led to many unethical authorship assignments throughout the world of publishing, including within faculty-student collaborations. Although the American Psychological Association (APA) passed a revised code of ethics in 1992 with special rules pertaining to such collaborative efforts, it is widely acknowledged that unethical assignments of authorship credit continue to occur regularly. This study found that of the 604 APA-member respondents, 165 (27.3{\%}) felt they had been involved in an unethical or unfair authorship assignment. Furthermore, nontenured faculty members and women were statistically more likely to be involved in an unethical or unfair assignment of authorship credit than tenured faculty members or men.",
author = "Sandler, {Jeffrey C.} and Russell, {Brenda L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "65--80",
journal = "Ethics and Behavior",
issn = "1050-8422",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Faculty-student collaborations : Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. / Sandler, Jeffrey C.; Russell, Brenda L.

In: Ethics and Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.07.2005, p. 65-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty-student collaborations

T2 - Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit

AU - Sandler, Jeffrey C.

AU - Russell, Brenda L.

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - In the academic world, a researcher's number of publications can carry huge professional and financial rewards. This truth has led to many unethical authorship assignments throughout the world of publishing, including within faculty-student collaborations. Although the American Psychological Association (APA) passed a revised code of ethics in 1992 with special rules pertaining to such collaborative efforts, it is widely acknowledged that unethical assignments of authorship credit continue to occur regularly. This study found that of the 604 APA-member respondents, 165 (27.3%) felt they had been involved in an unethical or unfair authorship assignment. Furthermore, nontenured faculty members and women were statistically more likely to be involved in an unethical or unfair assignment of authorship credit than tenured faculty members or men.

AB - In the academic world, a researcher's number of publications can carry huge professional and financial rewards. This truth has led to many unethical authorship assignments throughout the world of publishing, including within faculty-student collaborations. Although the American Psychological Association (APA) passed a revised code of ethics in 1992 with special rules pertaining to such collaborative efforts, it is widely acknowledged that unethical assignments of authorship credit continue to occur regularly. This study found that of the 604 APA-member respondents, 165 (27.3%) felt they had been involved in an unethical or unfair authorship assignment. Furthermore, nontenured faculty members and women were statistically more likely to be involved in an unethical or unfair assignment of authorship credit than tenured faculty members or men.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20744446597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20744446597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5

DO - 10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:20744446597

VL - 15

SP - 65

EP - 80

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

SN - 1050-8422

IS - 1

ER -