Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit

Jeffrey C. Sandler, Brenda L. Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the academic world, a researcher's number of publications can carry huge professional and financial rewards. This truth has led to many unethical authorship assignments throughout the world of publishing, including within faculty-student collaborations. Although the American Psychological Association (APA) passed a revised code of ethics in 1992 with special rules pertaining to such collaborative efforts, it is widely acknowledged that unethical assignments of authorship credit continue to occur regularly. This study found that of the 604 APA-member respondents, 165 (27.3%) felt they had been involved in an unethical or unfair authorship assignment. Furthermore, nontenured faculty members and women were statistically more likely to be involved in an unethical or unfair assignment of authorship credit than tenured faculty members or men.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-80
Number of pages16
JournalEthics and Behavior
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this