Family functioning in families of first-episode psychosis patients as compared to chronic mentally ill patients and healthy controls

Katerina Koutra, Sofia Triliva, Theano Roumeliotaki, Zacharias Stefanakis, Maria Basta, Christos Lionis, Alexandros Vgontzas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate possible differences in family environment among patients experiencing their First Episode of Psychosis (FEP), chronic patients and controls. Family cohesion and flexibility (FACES-IV) and psychological distress (GHQ-28) were evaluated in families of 50 FEP and 50 chronic patients, as well as 50 controls, whereas expressed emotion (FQ) and family burden (FBS) were assessed in families of FEP and chronic patients. Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusted for confounders, indicated impaired cohesion and flexibility for families of FEP patients compared to controls, and lower scores for families of chronic patients compared to those of FEP patients. Caregivers of chronic patients scored significantly higher in criticism, and reported higher burden and psychological distress than those of FEP patients. Our findings suggest that unbalanced levels of cohesion and flexibility, high criticism and burden appeared to be the outcome of psychosis and not risk factors triggering the onset of the illness. Furthermore, emotional over-involvement both in terms of positive (i.e. concern) and negative behaviors (i.e. overprotection) is prevalent in Greek families. Psychoeducational interventions from the early stages of the illness should be considered to promote caregivers' awareness regarding the patients' illness, which in turn, may ameliorate dysfunctional family interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)486-496
Number of pages11
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume219
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2014

Fingerprint

Mentally Ill Persons
Psychotic Disorders
Caregivers
Expressed Emotion
Psychology
Linear Models
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Koutra, Katerina ; Triliva, Sofia ; Roumeliotaki, Theano ; Stefanakis, Zacharias ; Basta, Maria ; Lionis, Christos ; Vgontzas, Alexandros. / Family functioning in families of first-episode psychosis patients as compared to chronic mentally ill patients and healthy controls. In: Psychiatry Research. 2014 ; Vol. 219, No. 3. pp. 486-496.
@article{799f2df4b28d430a92f89cf99025429d,
title = "Family functioning in families of first-episode psychosis patients as compared to chronic mentally ill patients and healthy controls",
abstract = "The present study aimed to investigate possible differences in family environment among patients experiencing their First Episode of Psychosis (FEP), chronic patients and controls. Family cohesion and flexibility (FACES-IV) and psychological distress (GHQ-28) were evaluated in families of 50 FEP and 50 chronic patients, as well as 50 controls, whereas expressed emotion (FQ) and family burden (FBS) were assessed in families of FEP and chronic patients. Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusted for confounders, indicated impaired cohesion and flexibility for families of FEP patients compared to controls, and lower scores for families of chronic patients compared to those of FEP patients. Caregivers of chronic patients scored significantly higher in criticism, and reported higher burden and psychological distress than those of FEP patients. Our findings suggest that unbalanced levels of cohesion and flexibility, high criticism and burden appeared to be the outcome of psychosis and not risk factors triggering the onset of the illness. Furthermore, emotional over-involvement both in terms of positive (i.e. concern) and negative behaviors (i.e. overprotection) is prevalent in Greek families. Psychoeducational interventions from the early stages of the illness should be considered to promote caregivers' awareness regarding the patients' illness, which in turn, may ameliorate dysfunctional family interactions.",
author = "Katerina Koutra and Sofia Triliva and Theano Roumeliotaki and Zacharias Stefanakis and Maria Basta and Christos Lionis and Alexandros Vgontzas",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "219",
pages = "486--496",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Family functioning in families of first-episode psychosis patients as compared to chronic mentally ill patients and healthy controls. / Koutra, Katerina; Triliva, Sofia; Roumeliotaki, Theano; Stefanakis, Zacharias; Basta, Maria; Lionis, Christos; Vgontzas, Alexandros.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 219, No. 3, 30.11.2014, p. 486-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family functioning in families of first-episode psychosis patients as compared to chronic mentally ill patients and healthy controls

AU - Koutra, Katerina

AU - Triliva, Sofia

AU - Roumeliotaki, Theano

AU - Stefanakis, Zacharias

AU - Basta, Maria

AU - Lionis, Christos

AU - Vgontzas, Alexandros

PY - 2014/11/30

Y1 - 2014/11/30

N2 - The present study aimed to investigate possible differences in family environment among patients experiencing their First Episode of Psychosis (FEP), chronic patients and controls. Family cohesion and flexibility (FACES-IV) and psychological distress (GHQ-28) were evaluated in families of 50 FEP and 50 chronic patients, as well as 50 controls, whereas expressed emotion (FQ) and family burden (FBS) were assessed in families of FEP and chronic patients. Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusted for confounders, indicated impaired cohesion and flexibility for families of FEP patients compared to controls, and lower scores for families of chronic patients compared to those of FEP patients. Caregivers of chronic patients scored significantly higher in criticism, and reported higher burden and psychological distress than those of FEP patients. Our findings suggest that unbalanced levels of cohesion and flexibility, high criticism and burden appeared to be the outcome of psychosis and not risk factors triggering the onset of the illness. Furthermore, emotional over-involvement both in terms of positive (i.e. concern) and negative behaviors (i.e. overprotection) is prevalent in Greek families. Psychoeducational interventions from the early stages of the illness should be considered to promote caregivers' awareness regarding the patients' illness, which in turn, may ameliorate dysfunctional family interactions.

AB - The present study aimed to investigate possible differences in family environment among patients experiencing their First Episode of Psychosis (FEP), chronic patients and controls. Family cohesion and flexibility (FACES-IV) and psychological distress (GHQ-28) were evaluated in families of 50 FEP and 50 chronic patients, as well as 50 controls, whereas expressed emotion (FQ) and family burden (FBS) were assessed in families of FEP and chronic patients. Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusted for confounders, indicated impaired cohesion and flexibility for families of FEP patients compared to controls, and lower scores for families of chronic patients compared to those of FEP patients. Caregivers of chronic patients scored significantly higher in criticism, and reported higher burden and psychological distress than those of FEP patients. Our findings suggest that unbalanced levels of cohesion and flexibility, high criticism and burden appeared to be the outcome of psychosis and not risk factors triggering the onset of the illness. Furthermore, emotional over-involvement both in terms of positive (i.e. concern) and negative behaviors (i.e. overprotection) is prevalent in Greek families. Psychoeducational interventions from the early stages of the illness should be considered to promote caregivers' awareness regarding the patients' illness, which in turn, may ameliorate dysfunctional family interactions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907597264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907597264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.045

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.045

M3 - Article

VL - 219

SP - 486

EP - 496

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 3

ER -