Fat discrimination: A phenotype with potential implications for studying fat intake behaviors and obesity

Lisa C.H. Liang, Johannah Sakimura, Daniel May, Cameron Breen, Elissa Driggin, Beverly J. Tepper, Wendy K. Chung, Kathleen Loralee Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Variations in fat preference and intake across humans are poorly understood in part because of difficulties in studying this behavior. The objective of this study was to develop a simple procedure to assess fat discrimination, the ability to accurately perceive differences in the fat content of foods, and assess the associations between this phenotype and fat ingestive behaviors and adiposity. African-American adults (n= 317) were tested for fat discrimination using 7 forced choice same/different tests with Italian salad dressings that ranged in fat-by-weight content from 5 to 55%. Performance on this procedure was determined by tallying the number of trials in which a participant correctly identified the pair of samples as "same" or "different" across all test pairs (ranging from 1 to 7). Individuals who received the lowest scores on this task (≤ 3 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat non-discriminators (n= 33) and those who received the highest scores (7 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat discriminators (n= 59). These 2 groups were compared for the primary outcome variables: reported food intake, preferences, and adiposity. After adjusting for BMI, sex, age, and dietary restraint and disinhibition, fat non-discriminators reported greater consumption of both added fats and reduced fat foods (p < 0.05 for both). Fat non-discriminators also had greater abdominal adiposity compared to fat discriminators (p < 0.05). Test-retest scores performed in a subset of participants (n= 40) showed moderate reliability of the fat discrimination test (rho = 0.53; p < 0.01). If these results are replicated, fat discrimination may serve as clinical research tool to identify participants who are at risk for obesity and other chronic diseases due to increased fat intake.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)470-475
Number of pages6
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 18 2012

Fingerprint

Obesity
Fats
Phenotype
Adiposity
Food Preferences
Food
Aptitude
Bandages
African Americans
Chronic Disease
Eating
Weights and Measures

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Liang, Lisa C.H. ; Sakimura, Johannah ; May, Daniel ; Breen, Cameron ; Driggin, Elissa ; Tepper, Beverly J. ; Chung, Wendy K. ; Keller, Kathleen Loralee. / Fat discrimination : A phenotype with potential implications for studying fat intake behaviors and obesity. In: Physiology and Behavior. 2012 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 470-475.
@article{24b9cefe771b43cfa8191fcaed578f9c,
title = "Fat discrimination: A phenotype with potential implications for studying fat intake behaviors and obesity",
abstract = "Variations in fat preference and intake across humans are poorly understood in part because of difficulties in studying this behavior. The objective of this study was to develop a simple procedure to assess fat discrimination, the ability to accurately perceive differences in the fat content of foods, and assess the associations between this phenotype and fat ingestive behaviors and adiposity. African-American adults (n= 317) were tested for fat discrimination using 7 forced choice same/different tests with Italian salad dressings that ranged in fat-by-weight content from 5 to 55{\%}. Performance on this procedure was determined by tallying the number of trials in which a participant correctly identified the pair of samples as {"}same{"} or {"}different{"} across all test pairs (ranging from 1 to 7). Individuals who received the lowest scores on this task (≤ 3 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat non-discriminators (n= 33) and those who received the highest scores (7 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat discriminators (n= 59). These 2 groups were compared for the primary outcome variables: reported food intake, preferences, and adiposity. After adjusting for BMI, sex, age, and dietary restraint and disinhibition, fat non-discriminators reported greater consumption of both added fats and reduced fat foods (p < 0.05 for both). Fat non-discriminators also had greater abdominal adiposity compared to fat discriminators (p < 0.05). Test-retest scores performed in a subset of participants (n= 40) showed moderate reliability of the fat discrimination test (rho = 0.53; p < 0.01). If these results are replicated, fat discrimination may serve as clinical research tool to identify participants who are at risk for obesity and other chronic diseases due to increased fat intake.",
author = "Liang, {Lisa C.H.} and Johannah Sakimura and Daniel May and Cameron Breen and Elissa Driggin and Tepper, {Beverly J.} and Chung, {Wendy K.} and Keller, {Kathleen Loralee}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "470--475",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Fat discrimination : A phenotype with potential implications for studying fat intake behaviors and obesity. / Liang, Lisa C.H.; Sakimura, Johannah; May, Daniel; Breen, Cameron; Driggin, Elissa; Tepper, Beverly J.; Chung, Wendy K.; Keller, Kathleen Loralee.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 105, No. 2, 18.01.2012, p. 470-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fat discrimination

T2 - A phenotype with potential implications for studying fat intake behaviors and obesity

AU - Liang, Lisa C.H.

AU - Sakimura, Johannah

AU - May, Daniel

AU - Breen, Cameron

AU - Driggin, Elissa

AU - Tepper, Beverly J.

AU - Chung, Wendy K.

AU - Keller, Kathleen Loralee

PY - 2012/1/18

Y1 - 2012/1/18

N2 - Variations in fat preference and intake across humans are poorly understood in part because of difficulties in studying this behavior. The objective of this study was to develop a simple procedure to assess fat discrimination, the ability to accurately perceive differences in the fat content of foods, and assess the associations between this phenotype and fat ingestive behaviors and adiposity. African-American adults (n= 317) were tested for fat discrimination using 7 forced choice same/different tests with Italian salad dressings that ranged in fat-by-weight content from 5 to 55%. Performance on this procedure was determined by tallying the number of trials in which a participant correctly identified the pair of samples as "same" or "different" across all test pairs (ranging from 1 to 7). Individuals who received the lowest scores on this task (≤ 3 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat non-discriminators (n= 33) and those who received the highest scores (7 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat discriminators (n= 59). These 2 groups were compared for the primary outcome variables: reported food intake, preferences, and adiposity. After adjusting for BMI, sex, age, and dietary restraint and disinhibition, fat non-discriminators reported greater consumption of both added fats and reduced fat foods (p < 0.05 for both). Fat non-discriminators also had greater abdominal adiposity compared to fat discriminators (p < 0.05). Test-retest scores performed in a subset of participants (n= 40) showed moderate reliability of the fat discrimination test (rho = 0.53; p < 0.01). If these results are replicated, fat discrimination may serve as clinical research tool to identify participants who are at risk for obesity and other chronic diseases due to increased fat intake.

AB - Variations in fat preference and intake across humans are poorly understood in part because of difficulties in studying this behavior. The objective of this study was to develop a simple procedure to assess fat discrimination, the ability to accurately perceive differences in the fat content of foods, and assess the associations between this phenotype and fat ingestive behaviors and adiposity. African-American adults (n= 317) were tested for fat discrimination using 7 forced choice same/different tests with Italian salad dressings that ranged in fat-by-weight content from 5 to 55%. Performance on this procedure was determined by tallying the number of trials in which a participant correctly identified the pair of samples as "same" or "different" across all test pairs (ranging from 1 to 7). Individuals who received the lowest scores on this task (≤ 3 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat non-discriminators (n= 33) and those who received the highest scores (7 out of 7 correct) were classified as fat discriminators (n= 59). These 2 groups were compared for the primary outcome variables: reported food intake, preferences, and adiposity. After adjusting for BMI, sex, age, and dietary restraint and disinhibition, fat non-discriminators reported greater consumption of both added fats and reduced fat foods (p < 0.05 for both). Fat non-discriminators also had greater abdominal adiposity compared to fat discriminators (p < 0.05). Test-retest scores performed in a subset of participants (n= 40) showed moderate reliability of the fat discrimination test (rho = 0.53; p < 0.01). If these results are replicated, fat discrimination may serve as clinical research tool to identify participants who are at risk for obesity and other chronic diseases due to increased fat intake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053490779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053490779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21925524

AN - SCOPUS:80053490779

VL - 105

SP - 470

EP - 475

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

IS - 2

ER -