Fate of wastewater-borne nutrients under low discharge conditions in the subsurface of the Florida Keys, USA

D. Reide Corbett, Lee Kump, Kevin Dillon, William Burnett, Jeffrey Chanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We designed experiments to evaluate the fate of the addition of wastewater-borne nutrients injected into the shallow subsurface in the Florida Keys. During three different experiments, either bulk unlabeled phosphate, radio-labeled phosphate (32PO4/3-), or bulk unlabeled nitrate (14NO3/1-) was added simultaneously with conservative tracers (sulfur hexafluoride and I-131) into a wastewater injection well on Long Key. Relative concentration changes monitored over time indicated that both phosphate and nitrate acted non-conservatively in the subsurface. Phosphate showed an initial rapid uptake followed by a slower removal, possibly caused by adsorption-desorption reactions. Based on our observations, we estimate that approximately 95% of the phosphate injected into the subsurface could be removed in 20 to 50 h. There was also evidence for some removal of nitrate, possibly due to denitrification. Approximately 65% of the nitrate was removed over several days, suggesting a denitrification rate of 2700 μmol m-3 groundwater h-1, comparable to estimates of denitrification in other groundwater systems. Collectively, our results suggest that nutrients injected in the subsurface are removed rapidly from solution and thus may not have a significant impact on surface waters. However, these experiments were conducted at a relatively small facility (2.6 m3 wastewater injected per day), while some facilities in the Keys inject as much as 750 m3 day-1. Saturation of available adsorption sites and organic substrate availability may limit the efficiency of wastewater nutrient removal under such conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-115
Number of pages17
JournalMarine Chemistry
Volume69
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2000

Fingerprint

Nutrients
Wastewater
Nitrates
Phosphates
phosphate
Denitrification
wastewater
nutrient
nitrate
denitrification
Groundwater
Sulfur Hexafluoride
adsorption
Adsorption
groundwater
experiment
Experiments
Surface waters
Desorption
desorption

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oceanography
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Corbett, D. Reide ; Kump, Lee ; Dillon, Kevin ; Burnett, William ; Chanton, Jeffrey. / Fate of wastewater-borne nutrients under low discharge conditions in the subsurface of the Florida Keys, USA. In: Marine Chemistry. 2000 ; Vol. 69, No. 1-2. pp. 99-115.
@article{efb6d2e50918473aa68b179d907ad216,
title = "Fate of wastewater-borne nutrients under low discharge conditions in the subsurface of the Florida Keys, USA",
abstract = "We designed experiments to evaluate the fate of the addition of wastewater-borne nutrients injected into the shallow subsurface in the Florida Keys. During three different experiments, either bulk unlabeled phosphate, radio-labeled phosphate (32PO4/3-), or bulk unlabeled nitrate (14NO3/1-) was added simultaneously with conservative tracers (sulfur hexafluoride and I-131) into a wastewater injection well on Long Key. Relative concentration changes monitored over time indicated that both phosphate and nitrate acted non-conservatively in the subsurface. Phosphate showed an initial rapid uptake followed by a slower removal, possibly caused by adsorption-desorption reactions. Based on our observations, we estimate that approximately 95{\%} of the phosphate injected into the subsurface could be removed in 20 to 50 h. There was also evidence for some removal of nitrate, possibly due to denitrification. Approximately 65{\%} of the nitrate was removed over several days, suggesting a denitrification rate of 2700 μmol m-3 groundwater h-1, comparable to estimates of denitrification in other groundwater systems. Collectively, our results suggest that nutrients injected in the subsurface are removed rapidly from solution and thus may not have a significant impact on surface waters. However, these experiments were conducted at a relatively small facility (2.6 m3 wastewater injected per day), while some facilities in the Keys inject as much as 750 m3 day-1. Saturation of available adsorption sites and organic substrate availability may limit the efficiency of wastewater nutrient removal under such conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.",
author = "Corbett, {D. Reide} and Lee Kump and Kevin Dillon and William Burnett and Jeffrey Chanton",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00099-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "99--115",
journal = "Marine Chemistry",
issn = "0304-4203",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

Fate of wastewater-borne nutrients under low discharge conditions in the subsurface of the Florida Keys, USA. / Corbett, D. Reide; Kump, Lee; Dillon, Kevin; Burnett, William; Chanton, Jeffrey.

In: Marine Chemistry, Vol. 69, No. 1-2, 01.03.2000, p. 99-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fate of wastewater-borne nutrients under low discharge conditions in the subsurface of the Florida Keys, USA

AU - Corbett, D. Reide

AU - Kump, Lee

AU - Dillon, Kevin

AU - Burnett, William

AU - Chanton, Jeffrey

PY - 2000/3/1

Y1 - 2000/3/1

N2 - We designed experiments to evaluate the fate of the addition of wastewater-borne nutrients injected into the shallow subsurface in the Florida Keys. During three different experiments, either bulk unlabeled phosphate, radio-labeled phosphate (32PO4/3-), or bulk unlabeled nitrate (14NO3/1-) was added simultaneously with conservative tracers (sulfur hexafluoride and I-131) into a wastewater injection well on Long Key. Relative concentration changes monitored over time indicated that both phosphate and nitrate acted non-conservatively in the subsurface. Phosphate showed an initial rapid uptake followed by a slower removal, possibly caused by adsorption-desorption reactions. Based on our observations, we estimate that approximately 95% of the phosphate injected into the subsurface could be removed in 20 to 50 h. There was also evidence for some removal of nitrate, possibly due to denitrification. Approximately 65% of the nitrate was removed over several days, suggesting a denitrification rate of 2700 μmol m-3 groundwater h-1, comparable to estimates of denitrification in other groundwater systems. Collectively, our results suggest that nutrients injected in the subsurface are removed rapidly from solution and thus may not have a significant impact on surface waters. However, these experiments were conducted at a relatively small facility (2.6 m3 wastewater injected per day), while some facilities in the Keys inject as much as 750 m3 day-1. Saturation of available adsorption sites and organic substrate availability may limit the efficiency of wastewater nutrient removal under such conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - We designed experiments to evaluate the fate of the addition of wastewater-borne nutrients injected into the shallow subsurface in the Florida Keys. During three different experiments, either bulk unlabeled phosphate, radio-labeled phosphate (32PO4/3-), or bulk unlabeled nitrate (14NO3/1-) was added simultaneously with conservative tracers (sulfur hexafluoride and I-131) into a wastewater injection well on Long Key. Relative concentration changes monitored over time indicated that both phosphate and nitrate acted non-conservatively in the subsurface. Phosphate showed an initial rapid uptake followed by a slower removal, possibly caused by adsorption-desorption reactions. Based on our observations, we estimate that approximately 95% of the phosphate injected into the subsurface could be removed in 20 to 50 h. There was also evidence for some removal of nitrate, possibly due to denitrification. Approximately 65% of the nitrate was removed over several days, suggesting a denitrification rate of 2700 μmol m-3 groundwater h-1, comparable to estimates of denitrification in other groundwater systems. Collectively, our results suggest that nutrients injected in the subsurface are removed rapidly from solution and thus may not have a significant impact on surface waters. However, these experiments were conducted at a relatively small facility (2.6 m3 wastewater injected per day), while some facilities in the Keys inject as much as 750 m3 day-1. Saturation of available adsorption sites and organic substrate availability may limit the efficiency of wastewater nutrient removal under such conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034106524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034106524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00099-7

DO - 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00099-7

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 99

EP - 115

JO - Marine Chemistry

JF - Marine Chemistry

SN - 0304-4203

IS - 1-2

ER -