FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel

C. Nikhare, M. Weiss, P. D. Hodgson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increasing application of hydroforming for the production of automotive lightweight components is mainly due to the attainable advantages regarding part properties and improving technology of the forming equipment. However, the high pressure requirements during hydroforming decreases the costs benefit and make the part expensive. Another requirement of automotive industries is weight reduction and better crash performance. Thereby steel industries developed advanced high strength steels which have high strength, good formability and better crash performance. Even though the thickness of the sheet to form the component is reduced, the pressure requirement to form the part during expansion is still high during high pressure hydroforming. This paper details the comparison between high and low pressure tube hydroforming for the square cross-section geometry. It is determined that the internal pressure and die closing force required for low pressure tube hydroforming process is much less than that of high pressure tube hydroforming process. The stress and thickness distribution of the part during tube crushing were critically analysed. Further, the stress distribution and forming mode were studied in this paper. Also friction effect on both processes was discussed. Crown

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-152
Number of pages7
JournalComputational Materials Science
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint

hydroforming
Steel
Tube
low pressure
steels
tubes
Finite element method
Crash
Requirements
crashes
Industry
High Strength Steel
Formability
requirements
stress distribution
Stress Distribution
industries
weight reduction
Friction
crushing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • Computational Mathematics

Cite this

@article{e49962e1a413466c8785382b19f5a439,
title = "FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel",
abstract = "The increasing application of hydroforming for the production of automotive lightweight components is mainly due to the attainable advantages regarding part properties and improving technology of the forming equipment. However, the high pressure requirements during hydroforming decreases the costs benefit and make the part expensive. Another requirement of automotive industries is weight reduction and better crash performance. Thereby steel industries developed advanced high strength steels which have high strength, good formability and better crash performance. Even though the thickness of the sheet to form the component is reduced, the pressure requirement to form the part during expansion is still high during high pressure hydroforming. This paper details the comparison between high and low pressure tube hydroforming for the square cross-section geometry. It is determined that the internal pressure and die closing force required for low pressure tube hydroforming process is much less than that of high pressure tube hydroforming process. The stress and thickness distribution of the part during tube crushing were critically analysed. Further, the stress distribution and forming mode were studied in this paper. Also friction effect on both processes was discussed. Crown",
author = "C. Nikhare and M. Weiss and Hodgson, {P. D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "146--152",
journal = "Computational Materials Science",
issn = "0927-0256",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel. / Nikhare, C.; Weiss, M.; Hodgson, P. D.

In: Computational Materials Science, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.11.2009, p. 146-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel

AU - Nikhare, C.

AU - Weiss, M.

AU - Hodgson, P. D.

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - The increasing application of hydroforming for the production of automotive lightweight components is mainly due to the attainable advantages regarding part properties and improving technology of the forming equipment. However, the high pressure requirements during hydroforming decreases the costs benefit and make the part expensive. Another requirement of automotive industries is weight reduction and better crash performance. Thereby steel industries developed advanced high strength steels which have high strength, good formability and better crash performance. Even though the thickness of the sheet to form the component is reduced, the pressure requirement to form the part during expansion is still high during high pressure hydroforming. This paper details the comparison between high and low pressure tube hydroforming for the square cross-section geometry. It is determined that the internal pressure and die closing force required for low pressure tube hydroforming process is much less than that of high pressure tube hydroforming process. The stress and thickness distribution of the part during tube crushing were critically analysed. Further, the stress distribution and forming mode were studied in this paper. Also friction effect on both processes was discussed. Crown

AB - The increasing application of hydroforming for the production of automotive lightweight components is mainly due to the attainable advantages regarding part properties and improving technology of the forming equipment. However, the high pressure requirements during hydroforming decreases the costs benefit and make the part expensive. Another requirement of automotive industries is weight reduction and better crash performance. Thereby steel industries developed advanced high strength steels which have high strength, good formability and better crash performance. Even though the thickness of the sheet to form the component is reduced, the pressure requirement to form the part during expansion is still high during high pressure hydroforming. This paper details the comparison between high and low pressure tube hydroforming for the square cross-section geometry. It is determined that the internal pressure and die closing force required for low pressure tube hydroforming process is much less than that of high pressure tube hydroforming process. The stress and thickness distribution of the part during tube crushing were critically analysed. Further, the stress distribution and forming mode were studied in this paper. Also friction effect on both processes was discussed. Crown

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350566540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350566540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350566540

VL - 47

SP - 146

EP - 152

JO - Computational Materials Science

JF - Computational Materials Science

SN - 0927-0256

IS - 1

ER -