Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings

Christopher N. Sciamanna, Bess H. Marcus, Michael G. Goldstein, Kipp Lawrence, Sue Swartz, Beth Bock, Amanda L. Graham, David K. Ahern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods. Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to survey responses were combined and adapted for use in primary care directly by patients. Ten primary care practices were recruited and worked closely with project staff to develop a practice-specific plan for incorporating the program into the workflow and office routine. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of patients who used the program during the day of their visit. Results. Only one of the ten offices was able to successfully incorporate the program into their office workflow and delivery of routine care. The main categories of barriers to incorporating the computer program into routine care included: • the program was viewed overall as inconsistent with practice workflow • the staff was inexperienced with the program • technical problems with the computer and/or printer • the program placed an additional time burden on staff who already felt overworked. Suggestions for improving the program or the way that it was incorporated into routine care included: • shortening the program • modifying the program's orientation to a target population (such as patients with hypertension) and incorporating decision-support feedback to help physicians manage the target condition • modifying the program to include other programs pertinent to primary care (for example, depression screening) • selecting patients to use the program, rather than asking all patients to use it. Conclusions. After working closely with ten highly motivated primary care offices, we were unable to fully implement a point-of-care health behaviour computer system for patients and providers. Suggestions for disseminating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-48
Number of pages9
JournalInformatics in Primary Care
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jun 1 2004

Fingerprint

Health Communication
Health Behavior
Primary Health Care
Health
Workflow
Communication
Computer program listings
Printers (computer)
Feedback
Software
Point-of-Care Systems
Health care
Screening
Computer systems
Health Services Needs and Demand
Computer Systems
Smoking
Exercise
Depression
Hypertension

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Informatics
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Sciamanna, C. N., Marcus, B. H., Goldstein, M. G., Lawrence, K., Swartz, S., Bock, B., ... Ahern, D. K. (2004). Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings. Informatics in Primary Care, 12(1), 40-48.
Sciamanna, Christopher N. ; Marcus, Bess H. ; Goldstein, Michael G. ; Lawrence, Kipp ; Swartz, Sue ; Bock, Beth ; Graham, Amanda L. ; Ahern, David K. / Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings. In: Informatics in Primary Care. 2004 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 40-48.
@article{a9c8bfa3098b4cf2a81412c771042d9e,
title = "Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings",
abstract = "Background. We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods. Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to survey responses were combined and adapted for use in primary care directly by patients. Ten primary care practices were recruited and worked closely with project staff to develop a practice-specific plan for incorporating the program into the workflow and office routine. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of patients who used the program during the day of their visit. Results. Only one of the ten offices was able to successfully incorporate the program into their office workflow and delivery of routine care. The main categories of barriers to incorporating the computer program into routine care included: • the program was viewed overall as inconsistent with practice workflow • the staff was inexperienced with the program • technical problems with the computer and/or printer • the program placed an additional time burden on staff who already felt overworked. Suggestions for improving the program or the way that it was incorporated into routine care included: • shortening the program • modifying the program's orientation to a target population (such as patients with hypertension) and incorporating decision-support feedback to help physicians manage the target condition • modifying the program to include other programs pertinent to primary care (for example, depression screening) • selecting patients to use the program, rather than asking all patients to use it. Conclusions. After working closely with ten highly motivated primary care offices, we were unable to fully implement a point-of-care health behaviour computer system for patients and providers. Suggestions for disseminating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings are discussed.",
author = "Sciamanna, {Christopher N.} and Marcus, {Bess H.} and Goldstein, {Michael G.} and Kipp Lawrence and Sue Swartz and Beth Bock and Graham, {Amanda L.} and Ahern, {David K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "40--48",
journal = "BMJ Health and Care Informatics",
issn = "2058-4555",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Sciamanna, CN, Marcus, BH, Goldstein, MG, Lawrence, K, Swartz, S, Bock, B, Graham, AL & Ahern, DK 2004, 'Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings', Informatics in Primary Care, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 40-48.

Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings. / Sciamanna, Christopher N.; Marcus, Bess H.; Goldstein, Michael G.; Lawrence, Kipp; Swartz, Sue; Bock, Beth; Graham, Amanda L.; Ahern, David K.

In: Informatics in Primary Care, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.06.2004, p. 40-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasebility of incorporating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings

AU - Sciamanna, Christopher N.

AU - Marcus, Bess H.

AU - Goldstein, Michael G.

AU - Lawrence, Kipp

AU - Swartz, Sue

AU - Bock, Beth

AU - Graham, Amanda L.

AU - Ahern, David K.

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - Background. We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods. Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to survey responses were combined and adapted for use in primary care directly by patients. Ten primary care practices were recruited and worked closely with project staff to develop a practice-specific plan for incorporating the program into the workflow and office routine. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of patients who used the program during the day of their visit. Results. Only one of the ten offices was able to successfully incorporate the program into their office workflow and delivery of routine care. The main categories of barriers to incorporating the computer program into routine care included: • the program was viewed overall as inconsistent with practice workflow • the staff was inexperienced with the program • technical problems with the computer and/or printer • the program placed an additional time burden on staff who already felt overworked. Suggestions for improving the program or the way that it was incorporated into routine care included: • shortening the program • modifying the program's orientation to a target population (such as patients with hypertension) and incorporating decision-support feedback to help physicians manage the target condition • modifying the program to include other programs pertinent to primary care (for example, depression screening) • selecting patients to use the program, rather than asking all patients to use it. Conclusions. After working closely with ten highly motivated primary care offices, we were unable to fully implement a point-of-care health behaviour computer system for patients and providers. Suggestions for disseminating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings are discussed.

AB - Background. We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods. Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to survey responses were combined and adapted for use in primary care directly by patients. Ten primary care practices were recruited and worked closely with project staff to develop a practice-specific plan for incorporating the program into the workflow and office routine. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of patients who used the program during the day of their visit. Results. Only one of the ten offices was able to successfully incorporate the program into their office workflow and delivery of routine care. The main categories of barriers to incorporating the computer program into routine care included: • the program was viewed overall as inconsistent with practice workflow • the staff was inexperienced with the program • technical problems with the computer and/or printer • the program placed an additional time burden on staff who already felt overworked. Suggestions for improving the program or the way that it was incorporated into routine care included: • shortening the program • modifying the program's orientation to a target population (such as patients with hypertension) and incorporating decision-support feedback to help physicians manage the target condition • modifying the program to include other programs pertinent to primary care (for example, depression screening) • selecting patients to use the program, rather than asking all patients to use it. Conclusions. After working closely with ten highly motivated primary care offices, we were unable to fully implement a point-of-care health behaviour computer system for patients and providers. Suggestions for disseminating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442440602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442440602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15140352

AN - SCOPUS:2442440602

VL - 12

SP - 40

EP - 48

JO - BMJ Health and Care Informatics

JF - BMJ Health and Care Informatics

SN - 2058-4555

IS - 1

ER -