Federalism and the Racialization of Welfare Policy

Christopher Ojeda, Anne M. Whitesell, Michael B. Berkman, Eric Plutzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Considerable research shows that welfare policies are stricter in states with large African American caseloads. We challenge the universality of this claim by extending Soss, Fording, and Schram’s Racial Classification Model to account for the multidimensionality of policy, the constraints imposed by federal funding, and state legislators’ ideological goals and racial stereotypes. Examining the work requirements, sanctions, time limits, and exemptions in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF), we test our hypotheses using the most detailed measures of state welfare policy yet examined. Consistent with our theory, we show that policy is more generous on some dimensions and less generous on others as the size of the African American caseload increases. This pattern reveals a complexity in welfare policy previously overlooked by research showing only negative effects. The results have important implications for theories addressing race in the context of TANF and other complex policy regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)474-501
Number of pages28
JournalState Politics and Policy Quarterly
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

federalism
social policy
family program
assistance
exemption
sanction
stereotype
funding
Federalism
Racialization
Welfare Policy
American
Caseload
African Americans

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Ojeda, Christopher ; Whitesell, Anne M. ; Berkman, Michael B. ; Plutzer, Eric. / Federalism and the Racialization of Welfare Policy. In: State Politics and Policy Quarterly. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 474-501.
@article{684422c5402a4e2c8fa5bac6ae62252f,
title = "Federalism and the Racialization of Welfare Policy",
abstract = "Considerable research shows that welfare policies are stricter in states with large African American caseloads. We challenge the universality of this claim by extending Soss, Fording, and Schram’s Racial Classification Model to account for the multidimensionality of policy, the constraints imposed by federal funding, and state legislators’ ideological goals and racial stereotypes. Examining the work requirements, sanctions, time limits, and exemptions in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF), we test our hypotheses using the most detailed measures of state welfare policy yet examined. Consistent with our theory, we show that policy is more generous on some dimensions and less generous on others as the size of the African American caseload increases. This pattern reveals a complexity in welfare policy previously overlooked by research showing only negative effects. The results have important implications for theories addressing race in the context of TANF and other complex policy regimes.",
author = "Christopher Ojeda and Whitesell, {Anne M.} and Berkman, {Michael B.} and Eric Plutzer",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1532440019873700",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "474--501",
journal = "State Politics and Policy Quarterly",
issn = "1532-4400",
publisher = "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign",
number = "4",

}

Federalism and the Racialization of Welfare Policy. / Ojeda, Christopher; Whitesell, Anne M.; Berkman, Michael B.; Plutzer, Eric.

In: State Politics and Policy Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 474-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Federalism and the Racialization of Welfare Policy

AU - Ojeda, Christopher

AU - Whitesell, Anne M.

AU - Berkman, Michael B.

AU - Plutzer, Eric

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Considerable research shows that welfare policies are stricter in states with large African American caseloads. We challenge the universality of this claim by extending Soss, Fording, and Schram’s Racial Classification Model to account for the multidimensionality of policy, the constraints imposed by federal funding, and state legislators’ ideological goals and racial stereotypes. Examining the work requirements, sanctions, time limits, and exemptions in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF), we test our hypotheses using the most detailed measures of state welfare policy yet examined. Consistent with our theory, we show that policy is more generous on some dimensions and less generous on others as the size of the African American caseload increases. This pattern reveals a complexity in welfare policy previously overlooked by research showing only negative effects. The results have important implications for theories addressing race in the context of TANF and other complex policy regimes.

AB - Considerable research shows that welfare policies are stricter in states with large African American caseloads. We challenge the universality of this claim by extending Soss, Fording, and Schram’s Racial Classification Model to account for the multidimensionality of policy, the constraints imposed by federal funding, and state legislators’ ideological goals and racial stereotypes. Examining the work requirements, sanctions, time limits, and exemptions in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF), we test our hypotheses using the most detailed measures of state welfare policy yet examined. Consistent with our theory, we show that policy is more generous on some dimensions and less generous on others as the size of the African American caseload increases. This pattern reveals a complexity in welfare policy previously overlooked by research showing only negative effects. The results have important implications for theories addressing race in the context of TANF and other complex policy regimes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073243138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073243138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532440019873700

DO - 10.1177/1532440019873700

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073243138

VL - 19

SP - 474

EP - 501

JO - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

JF - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

SN - 1532-4400

IS - 4

ER -