Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology

Gay Gragson, Jack Selzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is “the writer's audience always a fiction,” as Walter Ong contends, even when the writing is not poetry or fiction but scientific prose? To demonstrate the usefulness of Ong's approach to audience for analysts of nonfiction prose and for those who wish to empower student writers, we consider from a reader-response perspective two scientific articles on the same general topic written for the same discourse community in the same year. The authors of the two essays (prestigious scientists) directed their readers into two radically different roles. One makes his readers not only into “conventional” scientists but into willing novices who take note of his presentation but who do not take issue with it; the other creates disciplinary nonconformists, inquistive skeptics who have the perspectives necessary to understand the limits of scientific thought. The analysis elaborates the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse, demonstrates that even within the constraints of the journal article scientists have considerable freedom to exercise choices, and explicates how writersuse cues to direct readers into fictional roles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-58
Number of pages34
JournalWritten Communication
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1990

Fingerprint

biology
Students
writer
discourse
poetry
community
Fiction
Reader
student
Writer
Prose
Rhetoric
Discourse Community
Usefulness
Scientific Discourse
Non-conformist
Novice
Non-fiction
Thought
Poetry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Gragson, Gay ; Selzer, Jack. / Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology. In: Written Communication. 1990 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 25-58.
@article{7e7cede4833c4d93ae1ef8bfaada3a25,
title = "Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology",
abstract = "Is “the writer's audience always a fiction,” as Walter Ong contends, even when the writing is not poetry or fiction but scientific prose? To demonstrate the usefulness of Ong's approach to audience for analysts of nonfiction prose and for those who wish to empower student writers, we consider from a reader-response perspective two scientific articles on the same general topic written for the same discourse community in the same year. The authors of the two essays (prestigious scientists) directed their readers into two radically different roles. One makes his readers not only into “conventional” scientists but into willing novices who take note of his presentation but who do not take issue with it; the other creates disciplinary nonconformists, inquistive skeptics who have the perspectives necessary to understand the limits of scientific thought. The analysis elaborates the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse, demonstrates that even within the constraints of the journal article scientists have considerable freedom to exercise choices, and explicates how writersuse cues to direct readers into fictional roles.",
author = "Gay Gragson and Jack Selzer",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0741088390007001002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "25--58",
journal = "Written Communication",
issn = "0741-0883",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology. / Gragson, Gay; Selzer, Jack.

In: Written Communication, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.1990, p. 25-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fictionalizing the Readers of Scholarly Articles in Biology

AU - Gragson, Gay

AU - Selzer, Jack

PY - 1990/1

Y1 - 1990/1

N2 - Is “the writer's audience always a fiction,” as Walter Ong contends, even when the writing is not poetry or fiction but scientific prose? To demonstrate the usefulness of Ong's approach to audience for analysts of nonfiction prose and for those who wish to empower student writers, we consider from a reader-response perspective two scientific articles on the same general topic written for the same discourse community in the same year. The authors of the two essays (prestigious scientists) directed their readers into two radically different roles. One makes his readers not only into “conventional” scientists but into willing novices who take note of his presentation but who do not take issue with it; the other creates disciplinary nonconformists, inquistive skeptics who have the perspectives necessary to understand the limits of scientific thought. The analysis elaborates the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse, demonstrates that even within the constraints of the journal article scientists have considerable freedom to exercise choices, and explicates how writersuse cues to direct readers into fictional roles.

AB - Is “the writer's audience always a fiction,” as Walter Ong contends, even when the writing is not poetry or fiction but scientific prose? To demonstrate the usefulness of Ong's approach to audience for analysts of nonfiction prose and for those who wish to empower student writers, we consider from a reader-response perspective two scientific articles on the same general topic written for the same discourse community in the same year. The authors of the two essays (prestigious scientists) directed their readers into two radically different roles. One makes his readers not only into “conventional” scientists but into willing novices who take note of his presentation but who do not take issue with it; the other creates disciplinary nonconformists, inquistive skeptics who have the perspectives necessary to understand the limits of scientific thought. The analysis elaborates the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse, demonstrates that even within the constraints of the journal article scientists have considerable freedom to exercise choices, and explicates how writersuse cues to direct readers into fictional roles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932847144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932847144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0741088390007001002

DO - 10.1177/0741088390007001002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84932847144

VL - 7

SP - 25

EP - 58

JO - Written Communication

JF - Written Communication

SN - 0741-0883

IS - 1

ER -