Field test and cost analysis of four harvesting options for herbaceous biomass handling

Douglas Brownell, Jude Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The nature of most biomass materials is a low bulk density as compared to traditional fuel sources. High handling cost could be a limiting factor in utilizing biomass feedstock. Understanding available harvesting machinery systems and associated costs is critical to future implementation. Four popular harvesting machinery systems were studied and costs were analyzed based on field measurements and calculations. These four systems included (1) round baling and round bale handling systems, (2) large square baling and square bale handling systems, (3) forage harvester and trucking systems, and (4) large square baling plus square bale compression systems. Results indicated that a self-loading forage wagon can reduce the cost to harvest a crop but requires more harvest time. Large square bales were found to reduce cost of handling and transport as compared to round bales. Further research is needed to determine storage costs and deterioration loss of the two bale types. Compressed square bales were found to reduce storage, handling and transport costs. Compressed bale machinery has a high initial cost, which currently makes is only valuable for hay export.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2011

Fingerprint

cost analysis
Biomass
forage harvesters
wagons
Costs and Cost Analysis
biomass
feedstocks
hay
bulk density
Costs
deterioration
testing
forage
Machinery
crops
Harvesters
Feedstocks
Crops
Deterioration
Compaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{7911eafaeeef4cdeba7a21b79387867f,
title = "Field test and cost analysis of four harvesting options for herbaceous biomass handling",
abstract = "The nature of most biomass materials is a low bulk density as compared to traditional fuel sources. High handling cost could be a limiting factor in utilizing biomass feedstock. Understanding available harvesting machinery systems and associated costs is critical to future implementation. Four popular harvesting machinery systems were studied and costs were analyzed based on field measurements and calculations. These four systems included (1) round baling and round bale handling systems, (2) large square baling and square bale handling systems, (3) forage harvester and trucking systems, and (4) large square baling plus square bale compression systems. Results indicated that a self-loading forage wagon can reduce the cost to harvest a crop but requires more harvest time. Large square bales were found to reduce cost of handling and transport as compared to round bales. Further research is needed to determine storage costs and deterioration loss of the two bale types. Compressed square bales were found to reduce storage, handling and transport costs. Compressed bale machinery has a high initial cost, which currently makes is only valuable for hay export.",
author = "Douglas Brownell and Jude Liu",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2011.03.0-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering",
issn = "1934-6344",
publisher = "Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field test and cost analysis of four harvesting options for herbaceous biomass handling

AU - Brownell, Douglas

AU - Liu, Jude

PY - 2011/10/3

Y1 - 2011/10/3

N2 - The nature of most biomass materials is a low bulk density as compared to traditional fuel sources. High handling cost could be a limiting factor in utilizing biomass feedstock. Understanding available harvesting machinery systems and associated costs is critical to future implementation. Four popular harvesting machinery systems were studied and costs were analyzed based on field measurements and calculations. These four systems included (1) round baling and round bale handling systems, (2) large square baling and square bale handling systems, (3) forage harvester and trucking systems, and (4) large square baling plus square bale compression systems. Results indicated that a self-loading forage wagon can reduce the cost to harvest a crop but requires more harvest time. Large square bales were found to reduce cost of handling and transport as compared to round bales. Further research is needed to determine storage costs and deterioration loss of the two bale types. Compressed square bales were found to reduce storage, handling and transport costs. Compressed bale machinery has a high initial cost, which currently makes is only valuable for hay export.

AB - The nature of most biomass materials is a low bulk density as compared to traditional fuel sources. High handling cost could be a limiting factor in utilizing biomass feedstock. Understanding available harvesting machinery systems and associated costs is critical to future implementation. Four popular harvesting machinery systems were studied and costs were analyzed based on field measurements and calculations. These four systems included (1) round baling and round bale handling systems, (2) large square baling and square bale handling systems, (3) forage harvester and trucking systems, and (4) large square baling plus square bale compression systems. Results indicated that a self-loading forage wagon can reduce the cost to harvest a crop but requires more harvest time. Large square bales were found to reduce cost of handling and transport as compared to round bales. Further research is needed to determine storage costs and deterioration loss of the two bale types. Compressed square bales were found to reduce storage, handling and transport costs. Compressed bale machinery has a high initial cost, which currently makes is only valuable for hay export.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053258755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053258755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2011.03.0-0

DO - 10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2011.03.0-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053258755

VL - 4

JO - International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

JF - International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

SN - 1934-6344

IS - 3

ER -