Finding Order in Chaos: A Review of Hospital Ratings

Wenke Hwang, Jordan Derk, Michelle LaClair, Harold Paz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Publicly reported hospital performance data have become widely available to health care consumers in recent years. In response to a growing demand for more readily available health care information, various organizations have begun assessing hospital performance. These performance reporting systems have tremendous potential to aid patients, families, and primary care providers in their clinical decision making. This study takes a systematic approach to review the main features of 9 existing hospital rating systems, each of which is described using 9 areas of evaluation. The hospital rating systems included in this study vary widely in scope, methodology, transparency, and presentation of their results. Their results often present conflicting conclusions regarding the performance of the same hospital. This review of hospital rating systems demonstrates how public reporting may add confusion to patients’ health care decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-155
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Patient Care
Confusion
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
Clinical Decision-Making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{0cb155c717744c549f1a1f82bfccc42a,
title = "Finding Order in Chaos: A Review of Hospital Ratings",
abstract = "Publicly reported hospital performance data have become widely available to health care consumers in recent years. In response to a growing demand for more readily available health care information, various organizations have begun assessing hospital performance. These performance reporting systems have tremendous potential to aid patients, families, and primary care providers in their clinical decision making. This study takes a systematic approach to review the main features of 9 existing hospital rating systems, each of which is described using 9 areas of evaluation. The hospital rating systems included in this study vary widely in scope, methodology, transparency, and presentation of their results. Their results often present conflicting conclusions regarding the performance of the same hospital. This review of hospital rating systems demonstrates how public reporting may add confusion to patients’ health care decision making.",
author = "Wenke Hwang and Jordan Derk and Michelle LaClair and Harold Paz",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1062860614558085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "147--155",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Finding Order in Chaos : A Review of Hospital Ratings. / Hwang, Wenke; Derk, Jordan; LaClair, Michelle; Paz, Harold.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 147-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding Order in Chaos

T2 - A Review of Hospital Ratings

AU - Hwang, Wenke

AU - Derk, Jordan

AU - LaClair, Michelle

AU - Paz, Harold

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Publicly reported hospital performance data have become widely available to health care consumers in recent years. In response to a growing demand for more readily available health care information, various organizations have begun assessing hospital performance. These performance reporting systems have tremendous potential to aid patients, families, and primary care providers in their clinical decision making. This study takes a systematic approach to review the main features of 9 existing hospital rating systems, each of which is described using 9 areas of evaluation. The hospital rating systems included in this study vary widely in scope, methodology, transparency, and presentation of their results. Their results often present conflicting conclusions regarding the performance of the same hospital. This review of hospital rating systems demonstrates how public reporting may add confusion to patients’ health care decision making.

AB - Publicly reported hospital performance data have become widely available to health care consumers in recent years. In response to a growing demand for more readily available health care information, various organizations have begun assessing hospital performance. These performance reporting systems have tremendous potential to aid patients, families, and primary care providers in their clinical decision making. This study takes a systematic approach to review the main features of 9 existing hospital rating systems, each of which is described using 9 areas of evaluation. The hospital rating systems included in this study vary widely in scope, methodology, transparency, and presentation of their results. Their results often present conflicting conclusions regarding the performance of the same hospital. This review of hospital rating systems demonstrates how public reporting may add confusion to patients’ health care decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960090301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960090301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1062860614558085

DO - 10.1177/1062860614558085

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25381001

AN - SCOPUS:84960090301

VL - 31

SP - 147

EP - 155

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

IS - 2

ER -