Finding Partisanship Where We Least Expect it: Evidence of Partisan Bias in a New African Democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much of the literature on political behavior in Africa’s new semi-democracies has treated partisan affiliation as weak, purely pragmatic, or a proxy for other, more meaningful identities such as ethnicity. In this article, I dispute these conceptions by demonstrating that partisanship in an African context, like partisanship in established democracies, is a psychologically meaningful identity that can inspire voters to engage in motivated reasoning. By combining survey data with an original dataset of objective indicators of local public goods quality in Uganda, I show that supporters of the incumbent president systematically overestimate what they have received from government, while opposition supporters systematically underestimate. Partisan support precedes, rather than results from, this mis-estimation. I also show that partisans of the incumbent (opposition) are significantly more (less) likely to attribute any bad outcomes they observe to private actors rather than the government. I argue that these findings are consistent with the predictions of social identity theory: the conflict that marked many African political transitions, and the mapping of African parties onto existing social cleavages, are sufficient conditions for the creation of strong political-social identities like those that characterize partisanship in the West. My findings indicate that Africanists should take partisanship seriously as a predictor of political behavior and attitudes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-154
Number of pages26
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

democracy
political behavior
trend
evidence
opposition
local public
political attitude
Uganda
pragmatics
president
ethnicity
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{1e20cd371eed4082b70dc671b31ad800,
title = "Finding Partisanship Where We Least Expect it: Evidence of Partisan Bias in a New African Democracy",
abstract = "Much of the literature on political behavior in Africa’s new semi-democracies has treated partisan affiliation as weak, purely pragmatic, or a proxy for other, more meaningful identities such as ethnicity. In this article, I dispute these conceptions by demonstrating that partisanship in an African context, like partisanship in established democracies, is a psychologically meaningful identity that can inspire voters to engage in motivated reasoning. By combining survey data with an original dataset of objective indicators of local public goods quality in Uganda, I show that supporters of the incumbent president systematically overestimate what they have received from government, while opposition supporters systematically underestimate. Partisan support precedes, rather than results from, this mis-estimation. I also show that partisans of the incumbent (opposition) are significantly more (less) likely to attribute any bad outcomes they observe to private actors rather than the government. I argue that these findings are consistent with the predictions of social identity theory: the conflict that marked many African political transitions, and the mapping of African parties onto existing social cleavages, are sufficient conditions for the creation of strong political-social identities like those that characterize partisanship in the West. My findings indicate that Africanists should take partisanship seriously as a predictor of political behavior and attitudes.",
author = "Elizabeth Carlson",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-015-9309-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "129--154",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Finding Partisanship Where We Least Expect it : Evidence of Partisan Bias in a New African Democracy. / Carlson, Elizabeth.

In: Political Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 129-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finding Partisanship Where We Least Expect it

T2 - Evidence of Partisan Bias in a New African Democracy

AU - Carlson, Elizabeth

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Much of the literature on political behavior in Africa’s new semi-democracies has treated partisan affiliation as weak, purely pragmatic, or a proxy for other, more meaningful identities such as ethnicity. In this article, I dispute these conceptions by demonstrating that partisanship in an African context, like partisanship in established democracies, is a psychologically meaningful identity that can inspire voters to engage in motivated reasoning. By combining survey data with an original dataset of objective indicators of local public goods quality in Uganda, I show that supporters of the incumbent president systematically overestimate what they have received from government, while opposition supporters systematically underestimate. Partisan support precedes, rather than results from, this mis-estimation. I also show that partisans of the incumbent (opposition) are significantly more (less) likely to attribute any bad outcomes they observe to private actors rather than the government. I argue that these findings are consistent with the predictions of social identity theory: the conflict that marked many African political transitions, and the mapping of African parties onto existing social cleavages, are sufficient conditions for the creation of strong political-social identities like those that characterize partisanship in the West. My findings indicate that Africanists should take partisanship seriously as a predictor of political behavior and attitudes.

AB - Much of the literature on political behavior in Africa’s new semi-democracies has treated partisan affiliation as weak, purely pragmatic, or a proxy for other, more meaningful identities such as ethnicity. In this article, I dispute these conceptions by demonstrating that partisanship in an African context, like partisanship in established democracies, is a psychologically meaningful identity that can inspire voters to engage in motivated reasoning. By combining survey data with an original dataset of objective indicators of local public goods quality in Uganda, I show that supporters of the incumbent president systematically overestimate what they have received from government, while opposition supporters systematically underestimate. Partisan support precedes, rather than results from, this mis-estimation. I also show that partisans of the incumbent (opposition) are significantly more (less) likely to attribute any bad outcomes they observe to private actors rather than the government. I argue that these findings are consistent with the predictions of social identity theory: the conflict that marked many African political transitions, and the mapping of African parties onto existing social cleavages, are sufficient conditions for the creation of strong political-social identities like those that characterize partisanship in the West. My findings indicate that Africanists should take partisanship seriously as a predictor of political behavior and attitudes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958615197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958615197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-015-9309-5

DO - 10.1007/s11109-015-9309-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958615197

VL - 38

SP - 129

EP - 154

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 1

ER -