Firm heterogeneity and costly trade

A new estimation strategy and policy experiments

Ivan Cherkashin, Svetlana Demidova, Hiau Looi Kee, Kala Krishna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We build a tractable partial equilibrium model in the spirit of Melitz (2003) to help understand the role of trade preferences given to developing countries, as well as the efficacy of various subsidy policies. The model allows for firm level heterogeneity in both demand and productivity and lets the mass of firms that enter be endogenous.Trade preferences given by one country have positive spillovers on exports to others in this model. Preferences given by the EU to Bangladesh in an industry raise profits, resulting in entry, and some of these firms also export to the US. In contrast, simple competitive models would predict a fall in exports to the US. Such spillovers are shown to be large when exports are not constrained by quotas, suggesting that unilateral preferences given to developing countries might be more efficacious than expected in promoting their exports.The parameters of the model are estimated using cross sectional customs data on Bangladeshi exports of apparel to the US and EU. Counterfactual experiments regarding the effects of reducing costs, both fixed and marginal, or of trade preferences (with distortionary Rules of Origin) offered by an importing country are performed. The counterfactuals show that reducing fixed costs at various levels has very different effects and suggest that such reductions are more effective in promoting exports when applied at later stages when firms are more committed to production. A subsidy of 1.5 million dollars to industry entry costs raises exports by only 40 cents for every dollar spent, but when applied to fixed costs of production, it raises exports by $25 per dollar spent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-36
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of International Economics
Volume96
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Firm heterogeneity
Experiment
Trade preferences
Fixed costs
Developing countries
Industry
Subsidies
Efficacy
Positive spillover
Rules of origin
Profit
Spillover
Partial equilibrium model
Entry costs
Apparel
Cost of production
Competitive model
Marginal cost
Importing
Productivity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Cherkashin, Ivan ; Demidova, Svetlana ; Kee, Hiau Looi ; Krishna, Kala. / Firm heterogeneity and costly trade : A new estimation strategy and policy experiments. In: Journal of International Economics. 2015 ; Vol. 96, No. 1. pp. 18-36.
@article{35c0a43ed08c49379ffd13ddb5f93b3e,
title = "Firm heterogeneity and costly trade: A new estimation strategy and policy experiments",
abstract = "We build a tractable partial equilibrium model in the spirit of Melitz (2003) to help understand the role of trade preferences given to developing countries, as well as the efficacy of various subsidy policies. The model allows for firm level heterogeneity in both demand and productivity and lets the mass of firms that enter be endogenous.Trade preferences given by one country have positive spillovers on exports to others in this model. Preferences given by the EU to Bangladesh in an industry raise profits, resulting in entry, and some of these firms also export to the US. In contrast, simple competitive models would predict a fall in exports to the US. Such spillovers are shown to be large when exports are not constrained by quotas, suggesting that unilateral preferences given to developing countries might be more efficacious than expected in promoting their exports.The parameters of the model are estimated using cross sectional customs data on Bangladeshi exports of apparel to the US and EU. Counterfactual experiments regarding the effects of reducing costs, both fixed and marginal, or of trade preferences (with distortionary Rules of Origin) offered by an importing country are performed. The counterfactuals show that reducing fixed costs at various levels has very different effects and suggest that such reductions are more effective in promoting exports when applied at later stages when firms are more committed to production. A subsidy of 1.5 million dollars to industry entry costs raises exports by only 40 cents for every dollar spent, but when applied to fixed costs of production, it raises exports by $25 per dollar spent.",
author = "Ivan Cherkashin and Svetlana Demidova and Kee, {Hiau Looi} and Kala Krishna",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "18--36",
journal = "Journal of International Economics",
issn = "0022-1996",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Firm heterogeneity and costly trade : A new estimation strategy and policy experiments. / Cherkashin, Ivan; Demidova, Svetlana; Kee, Hiau Looi; Krishna, Kala.

In: Journal of International Economics, Vol. 96, No. 1, 01.05.2015, p. 18-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Firm heterogeneity and costly trade

T2 - A new estimation strategy and policy experiments

AU - Cherkashin, Ivan

AU - Demidova, Svetlana

AU - Kee, Hiau Looi

AU - Krishna, Kala

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - We build a tractable partial equilibrium model in the spirit of Melitz (2003) to help understand the role of trade preferences given to developing countries, as well as the efficacy of various subsidy policies. The model allows for firm level heterogeneity in both demand and productivity and lets the mass of firms that enter be endogenous.Trade preferences given by one country have positive spillovers on exports to others in this model. Preferences given by the EU to Bangladesh in an industry raise profits, resulting in entry, and some of these firms also export to the US. In contrast, simple competitive models would predict a fall in exports to the US. Such spillovers are shown to be large when exports are not constrained by quotas, suggesting that unilateral preferences given to developing countries might be more efficacious than expected in promoting their exports.The parameters of the model are estimated using cross sectional customs data on Bangladeshi exports of apparel to the US and EU. Counterfactual experiments regarding the effects of reducing costs, both fixed and marginal, or of trade preferences (with distortionary Rules of Origin) offered by an importing country are performed. The counterfactuals show that reducing fixed costs at various levels has very different effects and suggest that such reductions are more effective in promoting exports when applied at later stages when firms are more committed to production. A subsidy of 1.5 million dollars to industry entry costs raises exports by only 40 cents for every dollar spent, but when applied to fixed costs of production, it raises exports by $25 per dollar spent.

AB - We build a tractable partial equilibrium model in the spirit of Melitz (2003) to help understand the role of trade preferences given to developing countries, as well as the efficacy of various subsidy policies. The model allows for firm level heterogeneity in both demand and productivity and lets the mass of firms that enter be endogenous.Trade preferences given by one country have positive spillovers on exports to others in this model. Preferences given by the EU to Bangladesh in an industry raise profits, resulting in entry, and some of these firms also export to the US. In contrast, simple competitive models would predict a fall in exports to the US. Such spillovers are shown to be large when exports are not constrained by quotas, suggesting that unilateral preferences given to developing countries might be more efficacious than expected in promoting their exports.The parameters of the model are estimated using cross sectional customs data on Bangladeshi exports of apparel to the US and EU. Counterfactual experiments regarding the effects of reducing costs, both fixed and marginal, or of trade preferences (with distortionary Rules of Origin) offered by an importing country are performed. The counterfactuals show that reducing fixed costs at various levels has very different effects and suggest that such reductions are more effective in promoting exports when applied at later stages when firms are more committed to production. A subsidy of 1.5 million dollars to industry entry costs raises exports by only 40 cents for every dollar spent, but when applied to fixed costs of production, it raises exports by $25 per dollar spent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929130312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929130312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 18

EP - 36

JO - Journal of International Economics

JF - Journal of International Economics

SN - 0022-1996

IS - 1

ER -