Fixed investment/fundamental sensitivities under financial constraints

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While most models with financial market imperfections predict investment by financially constrained firms to be more sensitive to financial variables, contracting models argue that investment by such firms should be more sensitive to fundamental determinants of investment because fundamentals capture both investment opportunities and changes in the financial position. By first grouping U.S. manufacturing firms as either financially constrained or unconstrained, this paper examines systematic differences in investment/fundamental sensitivities. The findings show that, as expected of contracting models, investment by financially constrained firms is more responsive to fundamentals. These fundamentals are captured by two prominent empirical measures: profitability shocks and mandated investment rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-59
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Economics and Business
Volume75
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Fixed investment
Financial constraints
Contracting
Financial markets
Financial variables
Grouping
Investment opportunities
Market imperfections
Manufacturing firms
Profitability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{f43cb97ab2f24b6d97b693705287d9f5,
title = "Fixed investment/fundamental sensitivities under financial constraints",
abstract = "While most models with financial market imperfections predict investment by financially constrained firms to be more sensitive to financial variables, contracting models argue that investment by such firms should be more sensitive to fundamental determinants of investment because fundamentals capture both investment opportunities and changes in the financial position. By first grouping U.S. manufacturing firms as either financially constrained or unconstrained, this paper examines systematic differences in investment/fundamental sensitivities. The findings show that, as expected of contracting models, investment by financially constrained firms is more responsive to fundamentals. These fundamentals are captured by two prominent empirical measures: profitability shocks and mandated investment rate.",
author = "Nihal Bayraktar",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeconbus.2014.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "25--59",
journal = "Journal of Economics and Business",
issn = "0148-6195",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Fixed investment/fundamental sensitivities under financial constraints. / Bayraktar, Nihal.

In: Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 75, 01.01.2014, p. 25-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fixed investment/fundamental sensitivities under financial constraints

AU - Bayraktar, Nihal

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - While most models with financial market imperfections predict investment by financially constrained firms to be more sensitive to financial variables, contracting models argue that investment by such firms should be more sensitive to fundamental determinants of investment because fundamentals capture both investment opportunities and changes in the financial position. By first grouping U.S. manufacturing firms as either financially constrained or unconstrained, this paper examines systematic differences in investment/fundamental sensitivities. The findings show that, as expected of contracting models, investment by financially constrained firms is more responsive to fundamentals. These fundamentals are captured by two prominent empirical measures: profitability shocks and mandated investment rate.

AB - While most models with financial market imperfections predict investment by financially constrained firms to be more sensitive to financial variables, contracting models argue that investment by such firms should be more sensitive to fundamental determinants of investment because fundamentals capture both investment opportunities and changes in the financial position. By first grouping U.S. manufacturing firms as either financially constrained or unconstrained, this paper examines systematic differences in investment/fundamental sensitivities. The findings show that, as expected of contracting models, investment by financially constrained firms is more responsive to fundamentals. These fundamentals are captured by two prominent empirical measures: profitability shocks and mandated investment rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902972650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902972650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2014.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2014.05.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84902972650

VL - 75

SP - 25

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Economics and Business

JF - Journal of Economics and Business

SN - 0148-6195

ER -