FLSA Working Hours Reform: Worker Well-Being Effects in an Economic Framework

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses a model developed to predict the effects of recently proposed amendments to the FLSA workweek and overtime provisions. The model contrasts allowing compensatory time for overtime pay for private nonexempt employees to "rights to request" reduced hours. Hours demanded are likely to rise for workers who request comp time, undermining the intention of family-friendliness and alleviating overemployment, unless accompanied by offsetting policies that would prevent the denied use or forced use of comp time and that resurrect some monetary deterrent effect. A unique survey shows that the preference for time over money and comp time is relatively more prevalent among exempt, long hours and women workers; thus, worker welfare is likely better served if comp time were incorporated into an individualized, employee-initiated right to request.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)717-749
Number of pages33
JournalIndustrial Relations
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Personnel
Economics
Workers
Well-being
Working hours
Employees
Overtime

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{061f171cdbbe4f1d8f87cf8d59d54c48,
title = "FLSA Working Hours Reform: Worker Well-Being Effects in an Economic Framework",
abstract = "This article discusses a model developed to predict the effects of recently proposed amendments to the FLSA workweek and overtime provisions. The model contrasts allowing compensatory time for overtime pay for private nonexempt employees to {"}rights to request{"} reduced hours. Hours demanded are likely to rise for workers who request comp time, undermining the intention of family-friendliness and alleviating overemployment, unless accompanied by offsetting policies that would prevent the denied use or forced use of comp time and that resurrect some monetary deterrent effect. A unique survey shows that the preference for time over money and comp time is relatively more prevalent among exempt, long hours and women workers; thus, worker welfare is likely better served if comp time were incorporated into an individualized, employee-initiated right to request.",
author = "Lonnie Golden",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/irel.12112",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "717--749",
journal = "Industrial Relations",
issn = "0019-8676",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

FLSA Working Hours Reform : Worker Well-Being Effects in an Economic Framework. / Golden, Lonnie.

In: Industrial Relations, Vol. 54, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 717-749.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - FLSA Working Hours Reform

T2 - Worker Well-Being Effects in an Economic Framework

AU - Golden, Lonnie

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - This article discusses a model developed to predict the effects of recently proposed amendments to the FLSA workweek and overtime provisions. The model contrasts allowing compensatory time for overtime pay for private nonexempt employees to "rights to request" reduced hours. Hours demanded are likely to rise for workers who request comp time, undermining the intention of family-friendliness and alleviating overemployment, unless accompanied by offsetting policies that would prevent the denied use or forced use of comp time and that resurrect some monetary deterrent effect. A unique survey shows that the preference for time over money and comp time is relatively more prevalent among exempt, long hours and women workers; thus, worker welfare is likely better served if comp time were incorporated into an individualized, employee-initiated right to request.

AB - This article discusses a model developed to predict the effects of recently proposed amendments to the FLSA workweek and overtime provisions. The model contrasts allowing compensatory time for overtime pay for private nonexempt employees to "rights to request" reduced hours. Hours demanded are likely to rise for workers who request comp time, undermining the intention of family-friendliness and alleviating overemployment, unless accompanied by offsetting policies that would prevent the denied use or forced use of comp time and that resurrect some monetary deterrent effect. A unique survey shows that the preference for time over money and comp time is relatively more prevalent among exempt, long hours and women workers; thus, worker welfare is likely better served if comp time were incorporated into an individualized, employee-initiated right to request.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941213198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941213198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/irel.12112

DO - 10.1111/irel.12112

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941213198

VL - 54

SP - 717

EP - 749

JO - Industrial Relations

JF - Industrial Relations

SN - 0019-8676

IS - 4

ER -