TY - JOUR
T1 - Forces and moments generated by the human arm
T2 - Variability and control
AU - Xu, Y.
AU - Terekhov, A. V.
AU - Latash, M. L.
AU - Zatsiorsky, V. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors are thankful to Drs. J. Friedman and T. C. Pataky for useful advices and comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank Denny Ripka for constructing and manufacturing the hardware used in the experiments. The study was supported in part by NIH grants AG-018751, NS-035032 and AR-048563.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Abstract This is an exploratory study of the accurate endpoint force vector production by the human arm in isometric conditions. We formulated three common-sense hypotheses and falsified them in the experiment. The subjects (n = 10) exerted static forces on the handle in eight directions in a horizontal plane for 25 s. The forces were of 4 magnitude levels (10, 20, 30 and 40 % of individual maximal voluntary contractions). The torsion moment on the handle (grasp moment) was not specified in the instruction. The two force components and the grasp moment were recorded, and the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joint torques were computed. The following main facts were observed: (a) While the grasp moment was not prescribed by the instruction, it was always produced. The moment magnitude and direction depended on the instructed force magnitude and direction. (b) The within-trial angular variability of the exerted force vector (angular precision) did not depend on the target force magnitude (a small negative correlation was observed). (c) Across the target force directions, the variability of the exerted force magnitude and directional variability exhibited opposite trends: In the directions where the variability of force magnitude was maximal, the directional variability was minimal and vice versa. (d) The time profiles of joint torques in the trials were always positively correlated, even for the force directions where flexion torque was produced at one joint and extension torque was produced at the other joint. (e) The correlations between the grasp moment and the wrist torque were negative across the tasks and positive within the individual trials. (f) In static serial kinematic chains, the pattern of the joint torques distribution could not be explained by an optimization cost function additive with respect to the torques. Plans for several future experiments have been suggested.
AB - Abstract This is an exploratory study of the accurate endpoint force vector production by the human arm in isometric conditions. We formulated three common-sense hypotheses and falsified them in the experiment. The subjects (n = 10) exerted static forces on the handle in eight directions in a horizontal plane for 25 s. The forces were of 4 magnitude levels (10, 20, 30 and 40 % of individual maximal voluntary contractions). The torsion moment on the handle (grasp moment) was not specified in the instruction. The two force components and the grasp moment were recorded, and the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joint torques were computed. The following main facts were observed: (a) While the grasp moment was not prescribed by the instruction, it was always produced. The moment magnitude and direction depended on the instructed force magnitude and direction. (b) The within-trial angular variability of the exerted force vector (angular precision) did not depend on the target force magnitude (a small negative correlation was observed). (c) Across the target force directions, the variability of the exerted force magnitude and directional variability exhibited opposite trends: In the directions where the variability of force magnitude was maximal, the directional variability was minimal and vice versa. (d) The time profiles of joint torques in the trials were always positively correlated, even for the force directions where flexion torque was produced at one joint and extension torque was produced at the other joint. (e) The correlations between the grasp moment and the wrist torque were negative across the tasks and positive within the individual trials. (f) In static serial kinematic chains, the pattern of the joint torques distribution could not be explained by an optimization cost function additive with respect to the torques. Plans for several future experiments have been suggested.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871295560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871295560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-012-3235-0
DO - 10.1007/s00221-012-3235-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 23080084
AN - SCOPUS:84871295560
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 223
SP - 159
EP - 175
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 2
ER -