Format and scoring variations in behavioral expectation evaluations

Sheldon Zedeck, Ditsa Kafry, Rick Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Three formats (I, behavioral expectation scales; II, checklist; and III, graphic rating), each with an underlying behavioral expectation frame of reference, were compared for their variations in performance evaluation results. In addition, the effect of different scoring systems, for the same set of data, on the evaluation results were examined. Students (I, N = 50; II, N = 48; and III, N = 43) evaluated an instructor on forms which were developed by utilizing data generated in the Harari and Zedeck (1973) study. Results indicated that conclusions with respect to performance evaluation can be a function of response format or scoring system. Implications of these results with respect to their effect on the traditional response biases of halo and leniency are offered along with methods, for their assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-184
Number of pages14
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance
Issue number1
StatePublished - Oct 1976

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Format and scoring variations in behavioral expectation evaluations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this