Forming Limit Differences in Hemispherical Dome and Biaxial Test during Equibiaxial Tension on Cruciform

Chetan P. Nikhare, Emmett Vorisek, John R. Nolan, John Timothy Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditionally, the mechanical properties of materials have been characterized using the uniaxial tension test. This test is considered adequate for simple forming operations where single axis loading is dominant. Previous studies, however, have noted that the data acquired from this type of testing are not enough and additional details in other axes under simultaneous deformation conditions are important. To analyze the biaxial strain, some studies have suggested using the limiting dome height test and bulge test. However, these tests limit the extent of using multi-axial loading and the resulting stress pattern due to contact surfaces. Therefore, researchers devised the biaxial machine which is designed specifically to provide biaxial stress components using multiple and varying loading conditions. The idea of this work is to evaluate the relationship between the dome test data and the biaxial test data. For this comparison, cruciform specimens with a diamond shaped thinner gage in the center were deformed with biaxial stretching on the biaxial testing machine. In addition, the cruciform specimens were biaxially stretched with a hemispherical punch in a conventional die-punch setting. Furthermore, in each case, the process was simulated using a three-dimensional (3D) model generated on ABAQUS. These models were then compared with the experimental results. The forces on each arm, strain path, forming, and formability were analyzed. The differences between the processes were detailed. It was found that biaxial tests eliminated the pressurization effect which could be found in hemispherical dome tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number041011
JournalJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME
Volume139
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Domes
domes
Diamond
Pressurization
ABAQUS
Testing
Formability
Stretching
Gages
Diamonds
punches
Mechanical properties
three dimensional models
test equipment
diamonds
mechanical properties

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

@article{22cdf4e9669545418ae3d98e68b77073,
title = "Forming Limit Differences in Hemispherical Dome and Biaxial Test during Equibiaxial Tension on Cruciform",
abstract = "Traditionally, the mechanical properties of materials have been characterized using the uniaxial tension test. This test is considered adequate for simple forming operations where single axis loading is dominant. Previous studies, however, have noted that the data acquired from this type of testing are not enough and additional details in other axes under simultaneous deformation conditions are important. To analyze the biaxial strain, some studies have suggested using the limiting dome height test and bulge test. However, these tests limit the extent of using multi-axial loading and the resulting stress pattern due to contact surfaces. Therefore, researchers devised the biaxial machine which is designed specifically to provide biaxial stress components using multiple and varying loading conditions. The idea of this work is to evaluate the relationship between the dome test data and the biaxial test data. For this comparison, cruciform specimens with a diamond shaped thinner gage in the center were deformed with biaxial stretching on the biaxial testing machine. In addition, the cruciform specimens were biaxially stretched with a hemispherical punch in a conventional die-punch setting. Furthermore, in each case, the process was simulated using a three-dimensional (3D) model generated on ABAQUS. These models were then compared with the experimental results. The forces on each arm, strain path, forming, and formability were analyzed. The differences between the processes were detailed. It was found that biaxial tests eliminated the pressurization effect which could be found in hemispherical dome tests.",
author = "Nikhare, {Chetan P.} and Emmett Vorisek and Nolan, {John R.} and Roth, {John Timothy}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4037020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME",
issn = "0094-4289",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forming Limit Differences in Hemispherical Dome and Biaxial Test during Equibiaxial Tension on Cruciform

AU - Nikhare, Chetan P.

AU - Vorisek, Emmett

AU - Nolan, John R.

AU - Roth, John Timothy

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Traditionally, the mechanical properties of materials have been characterized using the uniaxial tension test. This test is considered adequate for simple forming operations where single axis loading is dominant. Previous studies, however, have noted that the data acquired from this type of testing are not enough and additional details in other axes under simultaneous deformation conditions are important. To analyze the biaxial strain, some studies have suggested using the limiting dome height test and bulge test. However, these tests limit the extent of using multi-axial loading and the resulting stress pattern due to contact surfaces. Therefore, researchers devised the biaxial machine which is designed specifically to provide biaxial stress components using multiple and varying loading conditions. The idea of this work is to evaluate the relationship between the dome test data and the biaxial test data. For this comparison, cruciform specimens with a diamond shaped thinner gage in the center were deformed with biaxial stretching on the biaxial testing machine. In addition, the cruciform specimens were biaxially stretched with a hemispherical punch in a conventional die-punch setting. Furthermore, in each case, the process was simulated using a three-dimensional (3D) model generated on ABAQUS. These models were then compared with the experimental results. The forces on each arm, strain path, forming, and formability were analyzed. The differences between the processes were detailed. It was found that biaxial tests eliminated the pressurization effect which could be found in hemispherical dome tests.

AB - Traditionally, the mechanical properties of materials have been characterized using the uniaxial tension test. This test is considered adequate for simple forming operations where single axis loading is dominant. Previous studies, however, have noted that the data acquired from this type of testing are not enough and additional details in other axes under simultaneous deformation conditions are important. To analyze the biaxial strain, some studies have suggested using the limiting dome height test and bulge test. However, these tests limit the extent of using multi-axial loading and the resulting stress pattern due to contact surfaces. Therefore, researchers devised the biaxial machine which is designed specifically to provide biaxial stress components using multiple and varying loading conditions. The idea of this work is to evaluate the relationship between the dome test data and the biaxial test data. For this comparison, cruciform specimens with a diamond shaped thinner gage in the center were deformed with biaxial stretching on the biaxial testing machine. In addition, the cruciform specimens were biaxially stretched with a hemispherical punch in a conventional die-punch setting. Furthermore, in each case, the process was simulated using a three-dimensional (3D) model generated on ABAQUS. These models were then compared with the experimental results. The forces on each arm, strain path, forming, and formability were analyzed. The differences between the processes were detailed. It was found that biaxial tests eliminated the pressurization effect which could be found in hemispherical dome tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022200526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022200526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4037020

DO - 10.1115/1.4037020

M3 - Article

VL - 139

JO - Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME

JF - Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Transactions of the ASME

SN - 0094-4289

IS - 4

M1 - 041011

ER -