Formulating the SDGs: Reproducing or Reimagining State-Centered Development?

Kathleen Sexsmith, Philip McMichael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reformulation of the millennium development goals comes at a time when their realization is falling short. ‘Development as usual’ through global goal setting is in question in context of the recent conjunction of global food, energy, and financial crises. Given the evidence of problematic world-scale restructuring, it is puzzling that SDG visioning continues to assign principal responsibility to states for the post-2015 development agenda. We regard this as an epistemic blind spot that foregoes an opportunity to reorient planning to accommodate the global dimensions of these crises—and their possible solutions. In particular, we note that current forms of land enclosure, and migrant labor generation, are inadequately addressed by state-centric measures, especially with respect to the rights of land users and stateless workers. We offer recommendations for complementing and modifying nationally generated metrics with a more empowering agenda.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-596
Number of pages16
JournalGlobalizations
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2015

Fingerprint

financial crisis
energy crisis
food
restructuring
migrant
labor
energy
worker
responsibility
planning
evidence
land
Agenda
recommendation
rights
world
migrant labour
time
Food
Responsibility

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{aa5fe689bf6a4432a26c2e679db56fc1,
title = "Formulating the SDGs: Reproducing or Reimagining State-Centered Development?",
abstract = "Reformulation of the millennium development goals comes at a time when their realization is falling short. ‘Development as usual’ through global goal setting is in question in context of the recent conjunction of global food, energy, and financial crises. Given the evidence of problematic world-scale restructuring, it is puzzling that SDG visioning continues to assign principal responsibility to states for the post-2015 development agenda. We regard this as an epistemic blind spot that foregoes an opportunity to reorient planning to accommodate the global dimensions of these crises—and their possible solutions. In particular, we note that current forms of land enclosure, and migrant labor generation, are inadequately addressed by state-centric measures, especially with respect to the rights of land users and stateless workers. We offer recommendations for complementing and modifying nationally generated metrics with a more empowering agenda.",
author = "Kathleen Sexsmith and Philip McMichael",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14747731.2015.1038096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "581--596",
journal = "Globalizations",
issn = "1474-7731",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Formulating the SDGs : Reproducing or Reimagining State-Centered Development? / Sexsmith, Kathleen; McMichael, Philip.

In: Globalizations, Vol. 12, No. 4, 04.07.2015, p. 581-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Formulating the SDGs

T2 - Reproducing or Reimagining State-Centered Development?

AU - Sexsmith, Kathleen

AU - McMichael, Philip

PY - 2015/7/4

Y1 - 2015/7/4

N2 - Reformulation of the millennium development goals comes at a time when their realization is falling short. ‘Development as usual’ through global goal setting is in question in context of the recent conjunction of global food, energy, and financial crises. Given the evidence of problematic world-scale restructuring, it is puzzling that SDG visioning continues to assign principal responsibility to states for the post-2015 development agenda. We regard this as an epistemic blind spot that foregoes an opportunity to reorient planning to accommodate the global dimensions of these crises—and their possible solutions. In particular, we note that current forms of land enclosure, and migrant labor generation, are inadequately addressed by state-centric measures, especially with respect to the rights of land users and stateless workers. We offer recommendations for complementing and modifying nationally generated metrics with a more empowering agenda.

AB - Reformulation of the millennium development goals comes at a time when their realization is falling short. ‘Development as usual’ through global goal setting is in question in context of the recent conjunction of global food, energy, and financial crises. Given the evidence of problematic world-scale restructuring, it is puzzling that SDG visioning continues to assign principal responsibility to states for the post-2015 development agenda. We regard this as an epistemic blind spot that foregoes an opportunity to reorient planning to accommodate the global dimensions of these crises—and their possible solutions. In particular, we note that current forms of land enclosure, and migrant labor generation, are inadequately addressed by state-centric measures, especially with respect to the rights of land users and stateless workers. We offer recommendations for complementing and modifying nationally generated metrics with a more empowering agenda.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930886023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930886023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2015.1038096

DO - 10.1080/14747731.2015.1038096

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930886023

VL - 12

SP - 581

EP - 596

JO - Globalizations

JF - Globalizations

SN - 1474-7731

IS - 4

ER -