Forward feeding in graduate medical education

Results of a national survey

Alexei O. Decastro, Lisa D. Mims, Mark Stephens, Alexander W. Chessman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: “Forward feeding” is defined as the sharing of information regarding learner behaviors and performance outside of formal institutional committee structures. The purpose of this study was to establish baseline opinions and policies of forward feeding in family medicine residency programs. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained as part of the 2015 CERA Program Directors Fall Survey. Program directors indicated whether they felt that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of various types of information about learners (academic performance, clinical performance, professionalism, physical health, and mental health), reasons for promoting, and concerns regarding forward feeding on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49% (227/461). Most agreed that faculty should (87%) and do (83%) engage in forward feeding. Concerns regarding professionalism and clinical performance were reported as most important to share. The most important reason identified for forward feeding was the early identification of struggling residents, followed by the ability to direct teaching to the resident’s specific needs, and improving the quality of feedback. Fear of creating bias was the most commonly cited concern for engaging in forward feeding, followed by fear of violating confidentiality and difficulty maintaining confidentiality. Fear of litigation was the least common concern. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns, the majority of program directors feel that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Our study confirms the importance of clinical performance and professionalism as two important themes of information shared by attendings about residents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326-330
Number of pages5
JournalFamily medicine
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Graduate Medical Education
Fear
Confidentiality
Aptitude
Information Dissemination
Jurisprudence
Internship and Residency
Mental Health
Teaching
Medicine
Health
Professionalism
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Decastro, Alexei O. ; Mims, Lisa D. ; Stephens, Mark ; Chessman, Alexander W. / Forward feeding in graduate medical education : Results of a national survey. In: Family medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 51, No. 4. pp. 326-330.
@article{1108674b52264fda95d682d0e7b56ee2,
title = "Forward feeding in graduate medical education: Results of a national survey",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: “Forward feeding” is defined as the sharing of information regarding learner behaviors and performance outside of formal institutional committee structures. The purpose of this study was to establish baseline opinions and policies of forward feeding in family medicine residency programs. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained as part of the 2015 CERA Program Directors Fall Survey. Program directors indicated whether they felt that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of various types of information about learners (academic performance, clinical performance, professionalism, physical health, and mental health), reasons for promoting, and concerns regarding forward feeding on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49{\%} (227/461). Most agreed that faculty should (87{\%}) and do (83{\%}) engage in forward feeding. Concerns regarding professionalism and clinical performance were reported as most important to share. The most important reason identified for forward feeding was the early identification of struggling residents, followed by the ability to direct teaching to the resident’s specific needs, and improving the quality of feedback. Fear of creating bias was the most commonly cited concern for engaging in forward feeding, followed by fear of violating confidentiality and difficulty maintaining confidentiality. Fear of litigation was the least common concern. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns, the majority of program directors feel that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Our study confirms the importance of clinical performance and professionalism as two important themes of information shared by attendings about residents.",
author = "Decastro, {Alexei O.} and Mims, {Lisa D.} and Mark Stephens and Chessman, {Alexander W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22454/FamMed.2019.113783",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "326--330",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

Forward feeding in graduate medical education : Results of a national survey. / Decastro, Alexei O.; Mims, Lisa D.; Stephens, Mark; Chessman, Alexander W.

In: Family medicine, Vol. 51, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 326-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forward feeding in graduate medical education

T2 - Results of a national survey

AU - Decastro, Alexei O.

AU - Mims, Lisa D.

AU - Stephens, Mark

AU - Chessman, Alexander W.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: “Forward feeding” is defined as the sharing of information regarding learner behaviors and performance outside of formal institutional committee structures. The purpose of this study was to establish baseline opinions and policies of forward feeding in family medicine residency programs. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained as part of the 2015 CERA Program Directors Fall Survey. Program directors indicated whether they felt that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of various types of information about learners (academic performance, clinical performance, professionalism, physical health, and mental health), reasons for promoting, and concerns regarding forward feeding on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49% (227/461). Most agreed that faculty should (87%) and do (83%) engage in forward feeding. Concerns regarding professionalism and clinical performance were reported as most important to share. The most important reason identified for forward feeding was the early identification of struggling residents, followed by the ability to direct teaching to the resident’s specific needs, and improving the quality of feedback. Fear of creating bias was the most commonly cited concern for engaging in forward feeding, followed by fear of violating confidentiality and difficulty maintaining confidentiality. Fear of litigation was the least common concern. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns, the majority of program directors feel that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Our study confirms the importance of clinical performance and professionalism as two important themes of information shared by attendings about residents.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: “Forward feeding” is defined as the sharing of information regarding learner behaviors and performance outside of formal institutional committee structures. The purpose of this study was to establish baseline opinions and policies of forward feeding in family medicine residency programs. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained as part of the 2015 CERA Program Directors Fall Survey. Program directors indicated whether they felt that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of various types of information about learners (academic performance, clinical performance, professionalism, physical health, and mental health), reasons for promoting, and concerns regarding forward feeding on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49% (227/461). Most agreed that faculty should (87%) and do (83%) engage in forward feeding. Concerns regarding professionalism and clinical performance were reported as most important to share. The most important reason identified for forward feeding was the early identification of struggling residents, followed by the ability to direct teaching to the resident’s specific needs, and improving the quality of feedback. Fear of creating bias was the most commonly cited concern for engaging in forward feeding, followed by fear of violating confidentiality and difficulty maintaining confidentiality. Fear of litigation was the least common concern. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerns, the majority of program directors feel that faculty should and do engage in forward feeding. Our study confirms the importance of clinical performance and professionalism as two important themes of information shared by attendings about residents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064722104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064722104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22454/FamMed.2019.113783

DO - 10.22454/FamMed.2019.113783

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 326

EP - 330

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 4

ER -