Forward to Where? U.S.-Russian Strategic Nuclear Force Reductions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The year 2009 begins a new security relationship, for better or worse, between Russia and the United States. On the policy menu for both states are carry-forward negotiations and looming deadlines with respect to strategic nuclear arms control. Despite the ups and downs of political relations during the years of the George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin presidencies, the United States and Russia have remained committed to reducing their numbers of operationally deployed, long range nuclear weapons. Those commitments have implications for other issues, including nonproliferation and counterterrorism. Since politics dominates strategy, the outcome of further negotiations on Russian-American nuclear arms reductions depends upon the character of the political winds that blow between Washington and Moscow. During the latter part of the Bush and Putin presidencies, those winds were Arctic. More favorable westerlies and easterlies permit progress, but what realistic options present themselves for policy makers' consideration? The following discussion considers those options, evaluates their credibility, and considers their possible side effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-86
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Phytoremediation
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Russia
political relations
Nuclear weapons
nuclear weapon
menu planning
politics
Arctic region
adverse effects
policy
side effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Plant Science

Cite this

@article{1e7df7d69550488f9e547eb06387427f,
title = "Forward to Where? U.S.-Russian Strategic Nuclear Force Reductions",
abstract = "The year 2009 begins a new security relationship, for better or worse, between Russia and the United States. On the policy menu for both states are carry-forward negotiations and looming deadlines with respect to strategic nuclear arms control. Despite the ups and downs of political relations during the years of the George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin presidencies, the United States and Russia have remained committed to reducing their numbers of operationally deployed, long range nuclear weapons. Those commitments have implications for other issues, including nonproliferation and counterterrorism. Since politics dominates strategy, the outcome of further negotiations on Russian-American nuclear arms reductions depends upon the character of the political winds that blow between Washington and Moscow. During the latter part of the Bush and Putin presidencies, those winds were Arctic. More favorable westerlies and easterlies permit progress, but what realistic options present themselves for policy makers' consideration? The following discussion considers those options, evaluates their credibility, and considers their possible side effects.",
author = "Stephen Cimbala",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13518040802695266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "68--86",
journal = "International Journal of Phytoremediation",
issn = "1522-6514",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Forward to Where? U.S.-Russian Strategic Nuclear Force Reductions. / Cimbala, Stephen.

In: International Journal of Phytoremediation, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 68-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forward to Where? U.S.-Russian Strategic Nuclear Force Reductions

AU - Cimbala, Stephen

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The year 2009 begins a new security relationship, for better or worse, between Russia and the United States. On the policy menu for both states are carry-forward negotiations and looming deadlines with respect to strategic nuclear arms control. Despite the ups and downs of political relations during the years of the George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin presidencies, the United States and Russia have remained committed to reducing their numbers of operationally deployed, long range nuclear weapons. Those commitments have implications for other issues, including nonproliferation and counterterrorism. Since politics dominates strategy, the outcome of further negotiations on Russian-American nuclear arms reductions depends upon the character of the political winds that blow between Washington and Moscow. During the latter part of the Bush and Putin presidencies, those winds were Arctic. More favorable westerlies and easterlies permit progress, but what realistic options present themselves for policy makers' consideration? The following discussion considers those options, evaluates their credibility, and considers their possible side effects.

AB - The year 2009 begins a new security relationship, for better or worse, between Russia and the United States. On the policy menu for both states are carry-forward negotiations and looming deadlines with respect to strategic nuclear arms control. Despite the ups and downs of political relations during the years of the George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin presidencies, the United States and Russia have remained committed to reducing their numbers of operationally deployed, long range nuclear weapons. Those commitments have implications for other issues, including nonproliferation and counterterrorism. Since politics dominates strategy, the outcome of further negotiations on Russian-American nuclear arms reductions depends upon the character of the political winds that blow between Washington and Moscow. During the latter part of the Bush and Putin presidencies, those winds were Arctic. More favorable westerlies and easterlies permit progress, but what realistic options present themselves for policy makers' consideration? The following discussion considers those options, evaluates their credibility, and considers their possible side effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045164586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045164586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13518040802695266

DO - 10.1080/13518040802695266

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 68

EP - 86

JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation

JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation

SN - 1522-6514

IS - 1

ER -