Frame-Induced Group Polarization in Small Discussion Networks

Michael Gabbay, Zane Kelly, Justin Reedy, John W. Gastil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We present a novel explanation for the group polarization effect whereby discussion among like-minded individuals induces shifts toward the extreme. Our theory distinguishes between a quantitative policy under debate and the discussion’s rhetorical frame, such as the likelihood of an outcome. If policy and frame position are mathematically related so that frame position increases more slowly as the policy becomes more extreme, majority formation at the extreme is favored, thereby shifting consensus formation toward the extreme. Additionally, use of a heuristic frame can shift the frame reference point away from the policy reference, yielding differential polarization on opposing policy sides. We present a mathematical model that predicts consensus policy given group member initial preferences and network structure. Our online group discussion experiment manipulated policy side, disagreement level, and network structure. The results, which challenge existing polarization theory, are in qualitative and quantitative accord with our theory and model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-271
Number of pages24
JournalSocial Psychology Quarterly
Volume81
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Consensus
Theoretical Models
Heuristics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Gabbay, Michael ; Kelly, Zane ; Reedy, Justin ; Gastil, John W. / Frame-Induced Group Polarization in Small Discussion Networks. In: Social Psychology Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 81, No. 3. pp. 248-271.
@article{322b8797c41944da95fafd080e8f5de7,
title = "Frame-Induced Group Polarization in Small Discussion Networks",
abstract = "We present a novel explanation for the group polarization effect whereby discussion among like-minded individuals induces shifts toward the extreme. Our theory distinguishes between a quantitative policy under debate and the discussion’s rhetorical frame, such as the likelihood of an outcome. If policy and frame position are mathematically related so that frame position increases more slowly as the policy becomes more extreme, majority formation at the extreme is favored, thereby shifting consensus formation toward the extreme. Additionally, use of a heuristic frame can shift the frame reference point away from the policy reference, yielding differential polarization on opposing policy sides. We present a mathematical model that predicts consensus policy given group member initial preferences and network structure. Our online group discussion experiment manipulated policy side, disagreement level, and network structure. The results, which challenge existing polarization theory, are in qualitative and quantitative accord with our theory and model.",
author = "Michael Gabbay and Zane Kelly and Justin Reedy and Gastil, {John W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0190272518778784",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "248--271",
journal = "Social Psychology Quarterly",
issn = "0190-2725",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Frame-Induced Group Polarization in Small Discussion Networks. / Gabbay, Michael; Kelly, Zane; Reedy, Justin; Gastil, John W.

In: Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 81, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 248-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frame-Induced Group Polarization in Small Discussion Networks

AU - Gabbay, Michael

AU - Kelly, Zane

AU - Reedy, Justin

AU - Gastil, John W.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - We present a novel explanation for the group polarization effect whereby discussion among like-minded individuals induces shifts toward the extreme. Our theory distinguishes between a quantitative policy under debate and the discussion’s rhetorical frame, such as the likelihood of an outcome. If policy and frame position are mathematically related so that frame position increases more slowly as the policy becomes more extreme, majority formation at the extreme is favored, thereby shifting consensus formation toward the extreme. Additionally, use of a heuristic frame can shift the frame reference point away from the policy reference, yielding differential polarization on opposing policy sides. We present a mathematical model that predicts consensus policy given group member initial preferences and network structure. Our online group discussion experiment manipulated policy side, disagreement level, and network structure. The results, which challenge existing polarization theory, are in qualitative and quantitative accord with our theory and model.

AB - We present a novel explanation for the group polarization effect whereby discussion among like-minded individuals induces shifts toward the extreme. Our theory distinguishes between a quantitative policy under debate and the discussion’s rhetorical frame, such as the likelihood of an outcome. If policy and frame position are mathematically related so that frame position increases more slowly as the policy becomes more extreme, majority formation at the extreme is favored, thereby shifting consensus formation toward the extreme. Additionally, use of a heuristic frame can shift the frame reference point away from the policy reference, yielding differential polarization on opposing policy sides. We present a mathematical model that predicts consensus policy given group member initial preferences and network structure. Our online group discussion experiment manipulated policy side, disagreement level, and network structure. The results, which challenge existing polarization theory, are in qualitative and quantitative accord with our theory and model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053391460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053391460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0190272518778784

DO - 10.1177/0190272518778784

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053391460

VL - 81

SP - 248

EP - 271

JO - Social Psychology Quarterly

JF - Social Psychology Quarterly

SN - 0190-2725

IS - 3

ER -