Franz Volhard lecture: Should doctors still measure blood pressure? the missing patients with masked hypertension

Thomas G. Pickering, William Gerin, Joseph E. Schwartz, Tanya M. Spruill, Karina W. Davidson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

The traditional reliance on blood pressure (BP) measurement in the medical setting misses a significant number of individuals with masked hypertension, who have normal clinic BP but persistently high daytime BP when measured out of the office. We suggest that masked hypertension may be a precursor of clinically recognized sustained hypertension and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk compared with consistent normotension. We discuss factors that may contribute to clinic-daytime BP differences as well as the changing relationship between these two measures over time. Anxiety at the time of BP measurement and having been diagnosed as hypertensive appear to be two possible mechanisms. The identification of individuals with masked hypertension is of great clinical importance and requires out-of-office BP screening. Ambulatory BP monitoring is the best established technique for doing this, but home monitoring may be applicable in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2259-2267
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of hypertension
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Franz Volhard lecture: Should doctors still measure blood pressure? the missing patients with masked hypertension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this