French Tough-movement revisited

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that predicates of the Tough-class in French embed not a verbal infinitive but rather, a gerundive verbal noun. This hypothesis allows us to capture a number of unexpected restrictions on French Tough-movement discussed by Legendre (1986). We show that these restrictions are best described as the inability of French Tough-movement infinitives to be followed by complements that are disallowed in their corresponding argument-taking event nominals. Our analysis of such infinitives as nominalized elements correctly predicts that they should never be selected by auxiliaries, and that they should have suppressed external arguments in the sense of Grimshaw (1990). French Tough-movement constructions are further argued to be closely related to the type of English gerund Huddleston (1971), Hantson (1984) and Clark (1985) call 'retroactive gerunds'. Like French Tough-movement constructions, English retroactive gerunds contain a gap, are possible only with a restricted class of predicates, do not license unbounded dependencies, and do not allow subjects, except when they are realized as by-phrases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalProbus
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

license
event
Tough Movement
Gerund
Infinitive
Gerundive
Nominals
Verbal Nouns

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{39615732b71b4ce5916009520fad6668,
title = "French Tough-movement revisited",
abstract = "In this paper, we argue that predicates of the Tough-class in French embed not a verbal infinitive but rather, a gerundive verbal noun. This hypothesis allows us to capture a number of unexpected restrictions on French Tough-movement discussed by Legendre (1986). We show that these restrictions are best described as the inability of French Tough-movement infinitives to be followed by complements that are disallowed in their corresponding argument-taking event nominals. Our analysis of such infinitives as nominalized elements correctly predicts that they should never be selected by auxiliaries, and that they should have suppressed external arguments in the sense of Grimshaw (1990). French Tough-movement constructions are further argued to be closely related to the type of English gerund Huddleston (1971), Hantson (1984) and Clark (1985) call 'retroactive gerunds'. Like French Tough-movement constructions, English retroactive gerunds contain a gap, are possible only with a restricted class of predicates, do not license unbounded dependencies, and do not allow subjects, except when they are realized as by-phrases.",
author = "J.-marc Authier and Reed, {Lisa A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/prbs.2009.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Probus",
issn = "0921-4771",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

French Tough-movement revisited. / Authier, J.-marc; Reed, Lisa A.

In: Probus, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.12.2009, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - French Tough-movement revisited

AU - Authier, J.-marc

AU - Reed, Lisa A.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - In this paper, we argue that predicates of the Tough-class in French embed not a verbal infinitive but rather, a gerundive verbal noun. This hypothesis allows us to capture a number of unexpected restrictions on French Tough-movement discussed by Legendre (1986). We show that these restrictions are best described as the inability of French Tough-movement infinitives to be followed by complements that are disallowed in their corresponding argument-taking event nominals. Our analysis of such infinitives as nominalized elements correctly predicts that they should never be selected by auxiliaries, and that they should have suppressed external arguments in the sense of Grimshaw (1990). French Tough-movement constructions are further argued to be closely related to the type of English gerund Huddleston (1971), Hantson (1984) and Clark (1985) call 'retroactive gerunds'. Like French Tough-movement constructions, English retroactive gerunds contain a gap, are possible only with a restricted class of predicates, do not license unbounded dependencies, and do not allow subjects, except when they are realized as by-phrases.

AB - In this paper, we argue that predicates of the Tough-class in French embed not a verbal infinitive but rather, a gerundive verbal noun. This hypothesis allows us to capture a number of unexpected restrictions on French Tough-movement discussed by Legendre (1986). We show that these restrictions are best described as the inability of French Tough-movement infinitives to be followed by complements that are disallowed in their corresponding argument-taking event nominals. Our analysis of such infinitives as nominalized elements correctly predicts that they should never be selected by auxiliaries, and that they should have suppressed external arguments in the sense of Grimshaw (1990). French Tough-movement constructions are further argued to be closely related to the type of English gerund Huddleston (1971), Hantson (1984) and Clark (1985) call 'retroactive gerunds'. Like French Tough-movement constructions, English retroactive gerunds contain a gap, are possible only with a restricted class of predicates, do not license unbounded dependencies, and do not allow subjects, except when they are realized as by-phrases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649209534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649209534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/prbs.2009.001

DO - 10.1515/prbs.2009.001

M3 - Review article

VL - 21

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Probus

JF - Probus

SN - 0921-4771

IS - 1

ER -