From headline to lifeline: does news set agenda for policy?

Jenna Grzeslo, Yang Bai, Ryan Yang Wang, Bumgi Min, Krishna Prasad Jayakar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This paper is an investigation of the volume, nature and tone of news media coverage of the federal Lifeline Program from its inception to 2018. It aims to examine whether news media coverage is correlated with significant episodes of reform in the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using the ProQuest Major Dailies database, articles covering the “Lifeline Program” were analyzed. Specifically, a quantitative codebook was developed, based on the literature, and four coders were trained to systematically analyze the 124 articles that discussed the program between 1985 and 2018. Findings: The findings suggest that reforms in the program were preceded by significantly higher volumes of media coverage; however, the analysis is unable to confirm that negative media coverage has a stronger agenda setting effect. In addition, no significant difference was found between positive and negative news stories in their use of research-based information. Originality/value: This study is interdisciplinary in its ability to combine policy and journalism studies as a mechanism to understand the relationship between the two forces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)352-368
Number of pages17
JournalDigital Policy, Regulation and Governance
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 10 2019

Fingerprint

Agenda
News
Media coverage
News media
Agenda setting
Design methodology
Journalism
Data base

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Grzeslo, Jenna ; Bai, Yang ; Wang, Ryan Yang ; Min, Bumgi ; Jayakar, Krishna Prasad. / From headline to lifeline : does news set agenda for policy?. In: Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 352-368.
@article{a6c4d2c8357841dcbd71e44bab1c1d4a,
title = "From headline to lifeline: does news set agenda for policy?",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper is an investigation of the volume, nature and tone of news media coverage of the federal Lifeline Program from its inception to 2018. It aims to examine whether news media coverage is correlated with significant episodes of reform in the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using the ProQuest Major Dailies database, articles covering the “Lifeline Program” were analyzed. Specifically, a quantitative codebook was developed, based on the literature, and four coders were trained to systematically analyze the 124 articles that discussed the program between 1985 and 2018. Findings: The findings suggest that reforms in the program were preceded by significantly higher volumes of media coverage; however, the analysis is unable to confirm that negative media coverage has a stronger agenda setting effect. In addition, no significant difference was found between positive and negative news stories in their use of research-based information. Originality/value: This study is interdisciplinary in its ability to combine policy and journalism studies as a mechanism to understand the relationship between the two forces.",
author = "Jenna Grzeslo and Yang Bai and Wang, {Ryan Yang} and Bumgi Min and Jayakar, {Krishna Prasad}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/DPRG-02-2019-0012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "352--368",
journal = "Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance",
issn = "1463-6697",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

From headline to lifeline : does news set agenda for policy? / Grzeslo, Jenna; Bai, Yang; Wang, Ryan Yang; Min, Bumgi; Jayakar, Krishna Prasad.

In: Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 21, No. 4, 10.06.2019, p. 352-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From headline to lifeline

T2 - does news set agenda for policy?

AU - Grzeslo, Jenna

AU - Bai, Yang

AU - Wang, Ryan Yang

AU - Min, Bumgi

AU - Jayakar, Krishna Prasad

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

N2 - Purpose: This paper is an investigation of the volume, nature and tone of news media coverage of the federal Lifeline Program from its inception to 2018. It aims to examine whether news media coverage is correlated with significant episodes of reform in the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using the ProQuest Major Dailies database, articles covering the “Lifeline Program” were analyzed. Specifically, a quantitative codebook was developed, based on the literature, and four coders were trained to systematically analyze the 124 articles that discussed the program between 1985 and 2018. Findings: The findings suggest that reforms in the program were preceded by significantly higher volumes of media coverage; however, the analysis is unable to confirm that negative media coverage has a stronger agenda setting effect. In addition, no significant difference was found between positive and negative news stories in their use of research-based information. Originality/value: This study is interdisciplinary in its ability to combine policy and journalism studies as a mechanism to understand the relationship between the two forces.

AB - Purpose: This paper is an investigation of the volume, nature and tone of news media coverage of the federal Lifeline Program from its inception to 2018. It aims to examine whether news media coverage is correlated with significant episodes of reform in the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using the ProQuest Major Dailies database, articles covering the “Lifeline Program” were analyzed. Specifically, a quantitative codebook was developed, based on the literature, and four coders were trained to systematically analyze the 124 articles that discussed the program between 1985 and 2018. Findings: The findings suggest that reforms in the program were preceded by significantly higher volumes of media coverage; however, the analysis is unable to confirm that negative media coverage has a stronger agenda setting effect. In addition, no significant difference was found between positive and negative news stories in their use of research-based information. Originality/value: This study is interdisciplinary in its ability to combine policy and journalism studies as a mechanism to understand the relationship between the two forces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068132015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068132015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/DPRG-02-2019-0012

DO - 10.1108/DPRG-02-2019-0012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068132015

VL - 21

SP - 352

EP - 368

JO - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

JF - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

SN - 1463-6697

IS - 4

ER -