From protest to agenda building

Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C

Jackie Smith, John David McCarthy, Clark Mcphail, Boguslaw Augustyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

187 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social movements often seek to draw attention to issues they deem important by organizing public demonstrations with the aim of attracting mass media coverage. But only a small proportion of all public demonstrations receives any media attention. This article asks whether even the minimal coverage that demonstrations receive reveal any influence of social movements in shaping how issues are framed by the mass media. Analyzing newspaper and television news stories on Washington, D.C. protests held during 1982 and 1991, we ask whether news reports on protests are framed in ways consistent with the aims of protesters. Do demonstrators receive media coverage that highlights the issues about which they are concerned, or does coverage focus on the protest event itself, to the exclusion of the social issues that movements target? Our results support much of the surmising among media scholars, that even when movements succeed at obtaining the attention of mass media outlets, media reports portray protests in ways that may undermine social movement agendas. Despite this obstacle to communicating protest messages through demonstrations, movements engage in other forms of communication that can affect public interpretations of mass media frames.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1397-1423
Number of pages27
JournalSocial Forces
Volume79
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

protest
mass media
coverage
event
trend
Social Movements
news report
social issue
social movement
television
newspaper
news
exclusion
Agenda
Washington, D.C.
Protest
interpretation
Mass Media
communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Smith, Jackie ; McCarthy, John David ; Mcphail, Clark ; Augustyn, Boguslaw. / From protest to agenda building : Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C. In: Social Forces. 2001 ; Vol. 79, No. 4. pp. 1397-1423.
@article{e428515653a74927ac962658725b153f,
title = "From protest to agenda building: Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C",
abstract = "Social movements often seek to draw attention to issues they deem important by organizing public demonstrations with the aim of attracting mass media coverage. But only a small proportion of all public demonstrations receives any media attention. This article asks whether even the minimal coverage that demonstrations receive reveal any influence of social movements in shaping how issues are framed by the mass media. Analyzing newspaper and television news stories on Washington, D.C. protests held during 1982 and 1991, we ask whether news reports on protests are framed in ways consistent with the aims of protesters. Do demonstrators receive media coverage that highlights the issues about which they are concerned, or does coverage focus on the protest event itself, to the exclusion of the social issues that movements target? Our results support much of the surmising among media scholars, that even when movements succeed at obtaining the attention of mass media outlets, media reports portray protests in ways that may undermine social movement agendas. Despite this obstacle to communicating protest messages through demonstrations, movements engage in other forms of communication that can affect public interpretations of mass media frames.",
author = "Jackie Smith and McCarthy, {John David} and Clark Mcphail and Boguslaw Augustyn",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/sof.2001.0053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1397--1423",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
number = "4",

}

From protest to agenda building : Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C. / Smith, Jackie; McCarthy, John David; Mcphail, Clark; Augustyn, Boguslaw.

In: Social Forces, Vol. 79, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 1397-1423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From protest to agenda building

T2 - Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C

AU - Smith, Jackie

AU - McCarthy, John David

AU - Mcphail, Clark

AU - Augustyn, Boguslaw

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Social movements often seek to draw attention to issues they deem important by organizing public demonstrations with the aim of attracting mass media coverage. But only a small proportion of all public demonstrations receives any media attention. This article asks whether even the minimal coverage that demonstrations receive reveal any influence of social movements in shaping how issues are framed by the mass media. Analyzing newspaper and television news stories on Washington, D.C. protests held during 1982 and 1991, we ask whether news reports on protests are framed in ways consistent with the aims of protesters. Do demonstrators receive media coverage that highlights the issues about which they are concerned, or does coverage focus on the protest event itself, to the exclusion of the social issues that movements target? Our results support much of the surmising among media scholars, that even when movements succeed at obtaining the attention of mass media outlets, media reports portray protests in ways that may undermine social movement agendas. Despite this obstacle to communicating protest messages through demonstrations, movements engage in other forms of communication that can affect public interpretations of mass media frames.

AB - Social movements often seek to draw attention to issues they deem important by organizing public demonstrations with the aim of attracting mass media coverage. But only a small proportion of all public demonstrations receives any media attention. This article asks whether even the minimal coverage that demonstrations receive reveal any influence of social movements in shaping how issues are framed by the mass media. Analyzing newspaper and television news stories on Washington, D.C. protests held during 1982 and 1991, we ask whether news reports on protests are framed in ways consistent with the aims of protesters. Do demonstrators receive media coverage that highlights the issues about which they are concerned, or does coverage focus on the protest event itself, to the exclusion of the social issues that movements target? Our results support much of the surmising among media scholars, that even when movements succeed at obtaining the attention of mass media outlets, media reports portray protests in ways that may undermine social movement agendas. Despite this obstacle to communicating protest messages through demonstrations, movements engage in other forms of communication that can affect public interpretations of mass media frames.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035532953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035532953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/sof.2001.0053

DO - 10.1353/sof.2001.0053

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1397

EP - 1423

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 4

ER -