From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to answer and discuss whether policy analysis is still relevant in the age of complex governance networks. This paper also proposes an ideal typical definition of policy analysis, which is that a government can solve society's problems based on the good advice provided by expert policy analysts and can measure the impacts of its policies. This paper argues that policy analysis and policymaking processes are more complex than the ideal type suggested by policy analysis and that governance is a better term, than policy, to capture this complexity and better reflect the realities of our times. To make the case for these arguments, this article first traces the history of policy analysis then cites the observations of governance: that in today's world governments are not unified actors that can make cohesive decisions, let alone their decisions being implemented as intended, and that governmental actors do not necessarily represent the 'public interest' or the collective will of the society. This paper further argues that the primary role of governmental actors should be to enhance the capacities of governmental and non-governmental actors to self-organize in order to generate desired outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPublic Policy Making in a Globalized World
Subtitle of host publicationRevised Edition
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages150-167
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780203712429
ISBN (Print)9781138095533
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

public policy
governance
ideal type
public interest
expert
history
society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Morcol, G. (2017). From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies. In Public Policy Making in a Globalized World: Revised Edition (pp. 150-167). Taylor and Francis.
Morcol, Goktug. / From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies. Public Policy Making in a Globalized World: Revised Edition. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 150-167
@inbook{5412d7fa8a684d9ea33ed31a19f90b91,
title = "From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies",
abstract = "The main aim of this paper is to answer and discuss whether policy analysis is still relevant in the age of complex governance networks. This paper also proposes an ideal typical definition of policy analysis, which is that a government can solve society's problems based on the good advice provided by expert policy analysts and can measure the impacts of its policies. This paper argues that policy analysis and policymaking processes are more complex than the ideal type suggested by policy analysis and that governance is a better term, than policy, to capture this complexity and better reflect the realities of our times. To make the case for these arguments, this article first traces the history of policy analysis then cites the observations of governance: that in today's world governments are not unified actors that can make cohesive decisions, let alone their decisions being implemented as intended, and that governmental actors do not necessarily represent the 'public interest' or the collective will of the society. This paper further argues that the primary role of governmental actors should be to enhance the capacities of governmental and non-governmental actors to self-organize in order to generate desired outcomes.",
author = "Goktug Morcol",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138095533",
pages = "150--167",
booktitle = "Public Policy Making in a Globalized World",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
address = "United States",

}

Morcol, G 2017, From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies. in Public Policy Making in a Globalized World: Revised Edition. Taylor and Francis, pp. 150-167.

From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies. / Morcol, Goktug.

Public Policy Making in a Globalized World: Revised Edition. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 150-167.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies

AU - Morcol, Goktug

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - The main aim of this paper is to answer and discuss whether policy analysis is still relevant in the age of complex governance networks. This paper also proposes an ideal typical definition of policy analysis, which is that a government can solve society's problems based on the good advice provided by expert policy analysts and can measure the impacts of its policies. This paper argues that policy analysis and policymaking processes are more complex than the ideal type suggested by policy analysis and that governance is a better term, than policy, to capture this complexity and better reflect the realities of our times. To make the case for these arguments, this article first traces the history of policy analysis then cites the observations of governance: that in today's world governments are not unified actors that can make cohesive decisions, let alone their decisions being implemented as intended, and that governmental actors do not necessarily represent the 'public interest' or the collective will of the society. This paper further argues that the primary role of governmental actors should be to enhance the capacities of governmental and non-governmental actors to self-organize in order to generate desired outcomes.

AB - The main aim of this paper is to answer and discuss whether policy analysis is still relevant in the age of complex governance networks. This paper also proposes an ideal typical definition of policy analysis, which is that a government can solve society's problems based on the good advice provided by expert policy analysts and can measure the impacts of its policies. This paper argues that policy analysis and policymaking processes are more complex than the ideal type suggested by policy analysis and that governance is a better term, than policy, to capture this complexity and better reflect the realities of our times. To make the case for these arguments, this article first traces the history of policy analysis then cites the observations of governance: that in today's world governments are not unified actors that can make cohesive decisions, let alone their decisions being implemented as intended, and that governmental actors do not necessarily represent the 'public interest' or the collective will of the society. This paper further argues that the primary role of governmental actors should be to enhance the capacities of governmental and non-governmental actors to self-organize in order to generate desired outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049818907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049818907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85049818907

SN - 9781138095533

SP - 150

EP - 167

BT - Public Policy Making in a Globalized World

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -

Morcol G. From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies. In Public Policy Making in a Globalized World: Revised Edition. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 150-167