From renewable to alternative: Waste coal, the Pennsylvania alternative Energy Portfolio Standard, and public legitimacy

Leland L. Glenna, Robert Roy Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Efforts to explain the failure of the U.S. federal government to pass energy legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions often turn to the theory of resource dependency. This theory is challenged by Pennsylvania's adoption of a Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS) policy, since Pennsylvania produces more coal than any of the other 27 with an RPS policy. However, we resist rejecting a theory that emphasizes resource dependence in this case, because Pennsylvania's RPS policy includes a fossil fuel: waste coal. Instead, we argue that a theory of the state that emphasizes policymakers' role in managing public legitimacy is needed to explain how resource dependence becomes a point of contestation in policy hearings. We demonstrate how Pennsylvania policymakers used rhetorical maneuvers and changed the title of the policy to justify the inclusion of waste coal in a renewable energy policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)856-871
Number of pages16
JournalSociety and Natural Resources
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'From renewable to alternative: Waste coal, the Pennsylvania alternative Energy Portfolio Standard, and public legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this