From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A word can be pronounced by applying spelling-sound correspondence rules or by looking up its pronunciation in the lexicon. In contrast, a novel string with no lexical entry should be pronounceable only through rule application. Recent research, though, suggests that lexical information may contribute to the pronunciation of nonwords (Glushko, 1979; Marcel, 1980). The present three experiments tested this possibility with the logic of spreading activation. Experiment 1 found a decrease in naming latencies for target words preceded by either related words or pseudowords created from those words, implicating lexical activity in pseudoword pronunciation. In Experiment 2, words visually similar to target pseudowords were semantically primed prior to pseudoword presentation, but the expected facilitation in pseudoword naming did not appear. Experiment 3 provided strong support for the hypothesis, however, demonstrating a marked bias in the pronunciation chosen for an ambiguous pseudoword as the result of priming a visually similar word.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-160
Number of pages9
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1983

Fingerprint

Research
Pseudowords
Experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{09baf5d6489d48479281d6a1cbdbf0a0,
title = "From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation",
abstract = "A word can be pronounced by applying spelling-sound correspondence rules or by looking up its pronunciation in the lexicon. In contrast, a novel string with no lexical entry should be pronounceable only through rule application. Recent research, though, suggests that lexical information may contribute to the pronunciation of nonwords (Glushko, 1979; Marcel, 1980). The present three experiments tested this possibility with the logic of spreading activation. Experiment 1 found a decrease in naming latencies for target words preceded by either related words or pseudowords created from those words, implicating lexical activity in pseudoword pronunciation. In Experiment 2, words visually similar to target pseudowords were semantically primed prior to pseudoword presentation, but the expected facilitation in pseudoword naming did not appear. Experiment 3 provided strong support for the hypothesis, however, demonstrating a marked bias in the pronunciation chosen for an ambiguous pseudoword as the result of priming a visually similar word.",
author = "Rosson, {Mary Beth}",
year = "1983",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03213470",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "152--160",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

From SOFA to LOUCH : Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation. / Rosson, Mary Beth.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.03.1983, p. 152-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From SOFA to LOUCH

T2 - Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation

AU - Rosson, Mary Beth

PY - 1983/3/1

Y1 - 1983/3/1

N2 - A word can be pronounced by applying spelling-sound correspondence rules or by looking up its pronunciation in the lexicon. In contrast, a novel string with no lexical entry should be pronounceable only through rule application. Recent research, though, suggests that lexical information may contribute to the pronunciation of nonwords (Glushko, 1979; Marcel, 1980). The present three experiments tested this possibility with the logic of spreading activation. Experiment 1 found a decrease in naming latencies for target words preceded by either related words or pseudowords created from those words, implicating lexical activity in pseudoword pronunciation. In Experiment 2, words visually similar to target pseudowords were semantically primed prior to pseudoword presentation, but the expected facilitation in pseudoword naming did not appear. Experiment 3 provided strong support for the hypothesis, however, demonstrating a marked bias in the pronunciation chosen for an ambiguous pseudoword as the result of priming a visually similar word.

AB - A word can be pronounced by applying spelling-sound correspondence rules or by looking up its pronunciation in the lexicon. In contrast, a novel string with no lexical entry should be pronounceable only through rule application. Recent research, though, suggests that lexical information may contribute to the pronunciation of nonwords (Glushko, 1979; Marcel, 1980). The present three experiments tested this possibility with the logic of spreading activation. Experiment 1 found a decrease in naming latencies for target words preceded by either related words or pseudowords created from those words, implicating lexical activity in pseudoword pronunciation. In Experiment 2, words visually similar to target pseudowords were semantically primed prior to pseudoword presentation, but the expected facilitation in pseudoword naming did not appear. Experiment 3 provided strong support for the hypothesis, however, demonstrating a marked bias in the pronunciation chosen for an ambiguous pseudoword as the result of priming a visually similar word.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020725508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020725508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03213470

DO - 10.3758/BF03213470

M3 - Article

C2 - 6865749

AN - SCOPUS:0020725508

VL - 11

SP - 152

EP - 160

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 2

ER -