Full-thickness chest wall resection for recurrent breast carcinoma: An institutional review and meta-analysis

Colette R.J. Pameijer, David Smith, Laurence E. Mccahill, David N. Bimston, Lawrence D. Wagman, Joshua D.I. Ellenhorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Locoregional recurrence of breast cancer can occur in up to 30 per cent of patients and has often been considered to indicate a poor prognosis. We reviewed our experience with full-thickness chest wall resection for recurrent breast cancer and conducted a meta-analysis of the English literature to determine patient characteristics and outcomes. Twenty-two women with isolated chest wall recurrence of breast cancer were treated between 1970 and 2000 at our institution. We reviewed their preoperative demographics, operative management and outcome, and combined our results with seven other English language studies. A majority of women (90%) underwent a mastectomy as initial management of their breast cancer. Only 18 per cent of patients had metastatic disease at the time of chest wall resection, and 71 per cent of patients had an R0 resection. The 5-year disease-free survival at City of Hope National Medical Center (COH) was 67 per cent and was 45 per cent for the entire group of 400 patients. The 5-year overall survival was 71 per cent for the COH group and 45 per cent for the entire group. Several studies reported prognostic factors, the most common being a better prognosis in patients with a disease-free interval greater than 24 months. Full-thickness chest wall resection for patients with isolated local recurrence of breast cancer can provide long-term palliation and even cure in some patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)711-715
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume71
Issue number9
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Full-thickness chest wall resection for recurrent breast carcinoma: An institutional review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this