Fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results

Liming Chang, W. Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Numerical analyses of micro-EHL problems have shown remarkably different results with Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models. However, no consensus has been reached whether a Newtonian model can be used in micro-EHL analysis. It is difficult to prove the point numerically as researchers use different numerical methods, grid sizes, time steps, and convergence criteria. This paper analytically studies the fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results. Algebraic governing equations are derived in terms of dimensionless parameters of the problem. Results are obtained for a range of key dimensionless parameters of practical interest. These results suggest that Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results would be qualitatively different and the differences would be most pronounced with surface roughness of short wavelengths. Since surface roughness of machine elements contains substantial short-wavelength contents, a Newtonian rheological model is likely to generate misleading micro-EHL results under all operating conditions under which the shear-thinning effect of the lubricant is significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
Journal[No source information available]
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Surface roughness
Wavelength
Shear thinning
Microanalysis
Lubricants
Numerical methods

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

@article{849a13f5523c42e49a90a33e2646fcde,
title = "Fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results",
abstract = "Numerical analyses of micro-EHL problems have shown remarkably different results with Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models. However, no consensus has been reached whether a Newtonian model can be used in micro-EHL analysis. It is difficult to prove the point numerically as researchers use different numerical methods, grid sizes, time steps, and convergence criteria. This paper analytically studies the fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results. Algebraic governing equations are derived in terms of dimensionless parameters of the problem. Results are obtained for a range of key dimensionless parameters of practical interest. These results suggest that Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results would be qualitatively different and the differences would be most pronounced with surface roughness of short wavelengths. Since surface roughness of machine elements contains substantial short-wavelength contents, a Newtonian rheological model is likely to generate misleading micro-EHL results under all operating conditions under which the shear-thinning effect of the lubricant is significant.",
author = "Liming Chang and W. Zhao",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "[No source information available]",
issn = "0402-1215",

}

Fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results. / Chang, Liming; Zhao, W.

In: [No source information available], 1994, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results

AU - Chang, Liming

AU - Zhao, W.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Numerical analyses of micro-EHL problems have shown remarkably different results with Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models. However, no consensus has been reached whether a Newtonian model can be used in micro-EHL analysis. It is difficult to prove the point numerically as researchers use different numerical methods, grid sizes, time steps, and convergence criteria. This paper analytically studies the fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results. Algebraic governing equations are derived in terms of dimensionless parameters of the problem. Results are obtained for a range of key dimensionless parameters of practical interest. These results suggest that Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results would be qualitatively different and the differences would be most pronounced with surface roughness of short wavelengths. Since surface roughness of machine elements contains substantial short-wavelength contents, a Newtonian rheological model is likely to generate misleading micro-EHL results under all operating conditions under which the shear-thinning effect of the lubricant is significant.

AB - Numerical analyses of micro-EHL problems have shown remarkably different results with Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models. However, no consensus has been reached whether a Newtonian model can be used in micro-EHL analysis. It is difficult to prove the point numerically as researchers use different numerical methods, grid sizes, time steps, and convergence criteria. This paper analytically studies the fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results. Algebraic governing equations are derived in terms of dimensionless parameters of the problem. Results are obtained for a range of key dimensionless parameters of practical interest. These results suggest that Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro-EHL results would be qualitatively different and the differences would be most pronounced with surface roughness of short wavelengths. Since surface roughness of machine elements contains substantial short-wavelength contents, a Newtonian rheological model is likely to generate misleading micro-EHL results under all operating conditions under which the shear-thinning effect of the lubricant is significant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028712952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028712952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - [No source information available]

JF - [No source information available]

SN - 0402-1215

ER -