Gaining voter support for watershed protection

Melissa Kreye, Damian C. Adams, Jeffrey D. Kline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Public officials and stakeholders who want to advance watershed protection may want to consider how ballot referendum design can serve as a nudge in voting behaviors. We extend the research literature on voter preferences by using behavioral economics theory to provide new insights into voter behaviors towards watershed conservation referendums. We drew upon observations from 76 separate watershed protection referendums, conducted in the eastern U.S. from 1991 to 2013, and evaluated the wording of the ballot statement to determine their potential influence on voter support and the psychology of voting. Data were fitted to weighted least squares regression models to allow for broader inferences about voting behaviors. We found shorter ballot referendums with broad or vague descriptions of expected benefits and fewer descriptions of funding mechanisms likely increased the perceived odds of a favorable outcome and subsequently increased likelihood of a yes vote.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104227
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume89
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

referendum
voter
watershed
voting behavior
economic theory
psychology
funding
stakeholders
least squares
voting
stakeholder
conservation
regression

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Kreye, Melissa ; Adams, Damian C. ; Kline, Jeffrey D. / Gaining voter support for watershed protection. In: Land Use Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 89.
@article{35d862fa7c194d0d91d1c33a4c1b9404,
title = "Gaining voter support for watershed protection",
abstract = "Public officials and stakeholders who want to advance watershed protection may want to consider how ballot referendum design can serve as a nudge in voting behaviors. We extend the research literature on voter preferences by using behavioral economics theory to provide new insights into voter behaviors towards watershed conservation referendums. We drew upon observations from 76 separate watershed protection referendums, conducted in the eastern U.S. from 1991 to 2013, and evaluated the wording of the ballot statement to determine their potential influence on voter support and the psychology of voting. Data were fitted to weighted least squares regression models to allow for broader inferences about voting behaviors. We found shorter ballot referendums with broad or vague descriptions of expected benefits and fewer descriptions of funding mechanisms likely increased the perceived odds of a favorable outcome and subsequently increased likelihood of a yes vote.",
author = "Melissa Kreye and Adams, {Damian C.} and Kline, {Jeffrey D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104227",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Gaining voter support for watershed protection. / Kreye, Melissa; Adams, Damian C.; Kline, Jeffrey D.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 89, 104227, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaining voter support for watershed protection

AU - Kreye, Melissa

AU - Adams, Damian C.

AU - Kline, Jeffrey D.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Public officials and stakeholders who want to advance watershed protection may want to consider how ballot referendum design can serve as a nudge in voting behaviors. We extend the research literature on voter preferences by using behavioral economics theory to provide new insights into voter behaviors towards watershed conservation referendums. We drew upon observations from 76 separate watershed protection referendums, conducted in the eastern U.S. from 1991 to 2013, and evaluated the wording of the ballot statement to determine their potential influence on voter support and the psychology of voting. Data were fitted to weighted least squares regression models to allow for broader inferences about voting behaviors. We found shorter ballot referendums with broad or vague descriptions of expected benefits and fewer descriptions of funding mechanisms likely increased the perceived odds of a favorable outcome and subsequently increased likelihood of a yes vote.

AB - Public officials and stakeholders who want to advance watershed protection may want to consider how ballot referendum design can serve as a nudge in voting behaviors. We extend the research literature on voter preferences by using behavioral economics theory to provide new insights into voter behaviors towards watershed conservation referendums. We drew upon observations from 76 separate watershed protection referendums, conducted in the eastern U.S. from 1991 to 2013, and evaluated the wording of the ballot statement to determine their potential influence on voter support and the psychology of voting. Data were fitted to weighted least squares regression models to allow for broader inferences about voting behaviors. We found shorter ballot referendums with broad or vague descriptions of expected benefits and fewer descriptions of funding mechanisms likely increased the perceived odds of a favorable outcome and subsequently increased likelihood of a yes vote.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072578831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072578831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104227

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104227

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072578831

VL - 89

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

M1 - 104227

ER -