Gas uptake in a three-generation model geometry with a flat inlet velocity during steady inspiration

Comparison of axisymmetric and three-dimensional models

Srinath Madasu, Ali Borhan, James Ultman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mass transfer coefficients were predicted and compared for uptake of reactive gas system using an axisymmetric single-path model (ASPM) with experimentally predicted values in a two-generation geometry and with a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model (CFDM) in a three-generation model geometry at steady inspiratory flow with a flat inlet velocity profile. The flow and concentration fields in the ASPM were solved using Galerkin's finite element method and in the CFDM using a commercial finite element software FIDAP. ASPM predicted average gas phase mass transfer coefficients within 25% of the experimental values. Numerical results in terms of overall mass transfer coefficients from the two models within each bifurcation unit were compared for two different inlet flow rates, wall mass transfer coefficients, and bifurcation angles. The overall mass transfer coefficients variation with bifurcation unit from the ASPM and CFDM compared qualitatively and quantitatively closely at lower wall mass transfer coefficients for both 40° and 70° bifurcation angles. But at higher wall mass transfer coefficients, quantitatively they were off in the range of 2-10% for 40° bifurcation angle and in the range of 4-15% for 70° bifurcation angle. Both CFDM and ASPM predict the same trends of increase in mass transfer coefficients with inlet flow, wall mass transfer coefficients, and during inspiration compared to expiration. Higher mass transfer coefficients were obtained with a flat velocity profile compared to a parabolic velocity profile using ASPM. These results validate the simplified ASPM and the complex CFDM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-503
Number of pages9
JournalInhalation Toxicology
Volume19
Issue number6-7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007

Fingerprint

Hydrodynamics
Mass transfer
Gases
Geometry
Dynamic models
Computational fluid dynamics
Inlet flow
Bifurcation (mathematics)
Software
Steady flow
Flow rate
Finite element method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Toxicology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

@article{eb25b59d46c74319b6139b3cb42a0230,
title = "Gas uptake in a three-generation model geometry with a flat inlet velocity during steady inspiration: Comparison of axisymmetric and three-dimensional models",
abstract = "Mass transfer coefficients were predicted and compared for uptake of reactive gas system using an axisymmetric single-path model (ASPM) with experimentally predicted values in a two-generation geometry and with a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model (CFDM) in a three-generation model geometry at steady inspiratory flow with a flat inlet velocity profile. The flow and concentration fields in the ASPM were solved using Galerkin's finite element method and in the CFDM using a commercial finite element software FIDAP. ASPM predicted average gas phase mass transfer coefficients within 25{\%} of the experimental values. Numerical results in terms of overall mass transfer coefficients from the two models within each bifurcation unit were compared for two different inlet flow rates, wall mass transfer coefficients, and bifurcation angles. The overall mass transfer coefficients variation with bifurcation unit from the ASPM and CFDM compared qualitatively and quantitatively closely at lower wall mass transfer coefficients for both 40° and 70° bifurcation angles. But at higher wall mass transfer coefficients, quantitatively they were off in the range of 2-10{\%} for 40° bifurcation angle and in the range of 4-15{\%} for 70° bifurcation angle. Both CFDM and ASPM predict the same trends of increase in mass transfer coefficients with inlet flow, wall mass transfer coefficients, and during inspiration compared to expiration. Higher mass transfer coefficients were obtained with a flat velocity profile compared to a parabolic velocity profile using ASPM. These results validate the simplified ASPM and the complex CFDM.",
author = "Srinath Madasu and Ali Borhan and James Ultman",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08958370701271704",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "495--503",
journal = "Inhalation Toxicology",
issn = "0895-8378",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6-7",

}

Gas uptake in a three-generation model geometry with a flat inlet velocity during steady inspiration : Comparison of axisymmetric and three-dimensional models. / Madasu, Srinath; Borhan, Ali; Ultman, James.

In: Inhalation Toxicology, Vol. 19, No. 6-7, 01.04.2007, p. 495-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gas uptake in a three-generation model geometry with a flat inlet velocity during steady inspiration

T2 - Comparison of axisymmetric and three-dimensional models

AU - Madasu, Srinath

AU - Borhan, Ali

AU - Ultman, James

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Mass transfer coefficients were predicted and compared for uptake of reactive gas system using an axisymmetric single-path model (ASPM) with experimentally predicted values in a two-generation geometry and with a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model (CFDM) in a three-generation model geometry at steady inspiratory flow with a flat inlet velocity profile. The flow and concentration fields in the ASPM were solved using Galerkin's finite element method and in the CFDM using a commercial finite element software FIDAP. ASPM predicted average gas phase mass transfer coefficients within 25% of the experimental values. Numerical results in terms of overall mass transfer coefficients from the two models within each bifurcation unit were compared for two different inlet flow rates, wall mass transfer coefficients, and bifurcation angles. The overall mass transfer coefficients variation with bifurcation unit from the ASPM and CFDM compared qualitatively and quantitatively closely at lower wall mass transfer coefficients for both 40° and 70° bifurcation angles. But at higher wall mass transfer coefficients, quantitatively they were off in the range of 2-10% for 40° bifurcation angle and in the range of 4-15% for 70° bifurcation angle. Both CFDM and ASPM predict the same trends of increase in mass transfer coefficients with inlet flow, wall mass transfer coefficients, and during inspiration compared to expiration. Higher mass transfer coefficients were obtained with a flat velocity profile compared to a parabolic velocity profile using ASPM. These results validate the simplified ASPM and the complex CFDM.

AB - Mass transfer coefficients were predicted and compared for uptake of reactive gas system using an axisymmetric single-path model (ASPM) with experimentally predicted values in a two-generation geometry and with a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model (CFDM) in a three-generation model geometry at steady inspiratory flow with a flat inlet velocity profile. The flow and concentration fields in the ASPM were solved using Galerkin's finite element method and in the CFDM using a commercial finite element software FIDAP. ASPM predicted average gas phase mass transfer coefficients within 25% of the experimental values. Numerical results in terms of overall mass transfer coefficients from the two models within each bifurcation unit were compared for two different inlet flow rates, wall mass transfer coefficients, and bifurcation angles. The overall mass transfer coefficients variation with bifurcation unit from the ASPM and CFDM compared qualitatively and quantitatively closely at lower wall mass transfer coefficients for both 40° and 70° bifurcation angles. But at higher wall mass transfer coefficients, quantitatively they were off in the range of 2-10% for 40° bifurcation angle and in the range of 4-15% for 70° bifurcation angle. Both CFDM and ASPM predict the same trends of increase in mass transfer coefficients with inlet flow, wall mass transfer coefficients, and during inspiration compared to expiration. Higher mass transfer coefficients were obtained with a flat velocity profile compared to a parabolic velocity profile using ASPM. These results validate the simplified ASPM and the complex CFDM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248579629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248579629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08958370701271704

DO - 10.1080/08958370701271704

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 495

EP - 503

JO - Inhalation Toxicology

JF - Inhalation Toxicology

SN - 0895-8378

IS - 6-7

ER -