Gender differences in attributions and emotions in helping contexts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gender differences in the provision and receipt of emotional support may result from differences in the formation of responsibility and effort attributions in support-seeking interactions. Participants (N = 1,211, primarily middle-class, European American college students) read support-seeking scenarios that varied in support-seeker gender, responsibility for the problem, and effort to resolve the problem, as well as the problem itself, and completed measures of responsibility, effort attributions, and emotions (anger, sympathy). Results indicated qualified and subtle gender differences in attributions, emotions, and attribution-emotion associations, which are broadly consistent with the application of gendered moral orientations and instrumentality norms. These findings are discussed with respect to theorizing about gender differences in attribution processes and emotional support behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-182
Number of pages8
JournalSex Roles
Volume48
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

attribution
gender-specific factors
Emotions
emotion
responsibility
Anger
Students
sympathy
anger
middle class
scenario
gender
interaction
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{0eada050911c4582ae8cec9a9d5af139,
title = "Gender differences in attributions and emotions in helping contexts",
abstract = "Gender differences in the provision and receipt of emotional support may result from differences in the formation of responsibility and effort attributions in support-seeking interactions. Participants (N = 1,211, primarily middle-class, European American college students) read support-seeking scenarios that varied in support-seeker gender, responsibility for the problem, and effort to resolve the problem, as well as the problem itself, and completed measures of responsibility, effort attributions, and emotions (anger, sympathy). Results indicated qualified and subtle gender differences in attributions, emotions, and attribution-emotion associations, which are broadly consistent with the application of gendered moral orientations and instrumentality norms. These findings are discussed with respect to theorizing about gender differences in attribution processes and emotional support behavior.",
author = "Macgeorge, {Erina Lynne}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1022459507110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "175--182",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3-4",

}

Gender differences in attributions and emotions in helping contexts. / Macgeorge, Erina Lynne.

In: Sex Roles, Vol. 48, No. 3-4, 01.02.2003, p. 175-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in attributions and emotions in helping contexts

AU - Macgeorge, Erina Lynne

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Gender differences in the provision and receipt of emotional support may result from differences in the formation of responsibility and effort attributions in support-seeking interactions. Participants (N = 1,211, primarily middle-class, European American college students) read support-seeking scenarios that varied in support-seeker gender, responsibility for the problem, and effort to resolve the problem, as well as the problem itself, and completed measures of responsibility, effort attributions, and emotions (anger, sympathy). Results indicated qualified and subtle gender differences in attributions, emotions, and attribution-emotion associations, which are broadly consistent with the application of gendered moral orientations and instrumentality norms. These findings are discussed with respect to theorizing about gender differences in attribution processes and emotional support behavior.

AB - Gender differences in the provision and receipt of emotional support may result from differences in the formation of responsibility and effort attributions in support-seeking interactions. Participants (N = 1,211, primarily middle-class, European American college students) read support-seeking scenarios that varied in support-seeker gender, responsibility for the problem, and effort to resolve the problem, as well as the problem itself, and completed measures of responsibility, effort attributions, and emotions (anger, sympathy). Results indicated qualified and subtle gender differences in attributions, emotions, and attribution-emotion associations, which are broadly consistent with the application of gendered moral orientations and instrumentality norms. These findings are discussed with respect to theorizing about gender differences in attribution processes and emotional support behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037287934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037287934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1022459507110

DO - 10.1023/A:1022459507110

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 175

EP - 182

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

IS - 3-4

ER -