Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace

Linda E. Hurt, Richard L. Wiener, Brenda L. Russell, R. Kelley Mannen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Qualitative interviews exploring gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment were conducted with 100 full-time St. Louis area employees. Women more than men reported that telling dirty/sexual jokes was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when they happened in the workplace, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when the man's intentions were not harmful. Men more than women reported that requesting a date was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when the woman did not welcome the behavior, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when they did not violate workplace norms. Logistic regression analysis predicted the respondent gender with 86% accuracy. Finally, concept mapping suggested that when women think about harassers they are concerned with power and social aptitude, while men seem to be more concerned about the responsibility and psychological adjustment of perpetrators of sexual harassment. When women think about victims of harassment they are concerned with a woman's assertiveness and work effectiveness, while men are more concerned with the psychological state of the woman and how provocative she is when they think about victims of sexual harassment. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-433
Number of pages21
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Workplace
gender-specific factors
workplace
Sexual Harassment
sexual harassment
Assertiveness
Aptitude
joke
aptitude
qualitative interview
regression analysis
Logistic Models
logistics
Regression Analysis
employee
Interviews
Psychology
responsibility
gender

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Hurt, Linda E. ; Wiener, Richard L. ; Russell, Brenda L. ; Mannen, R. Kelley. / Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace. In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 1999 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 413-433.
@article{b284531172654c01be20d115a6b747b9,
title = "Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace",
abstract = "Qualitative interviews exploring gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment were conducted with 100 full-time St. Louis area employees. Women more than men reported that telling dirty/sexual jokes was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when they happened in the workplace, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when the man's intentions were not harmful. Men more than women reported that requesting a date was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when the woman did not welcome the behavior, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when they did not violate workplace norms. Logistic regression analysis predicted the respondent gender with 86{\%} accuracy. Finally, concept mapping suggested that when women think about harassers they are concerned with power and social aptitude, while men seem to be more concerned about the responsibility and psychological adjustment of perpetrators of sexual harassment. When women think about victims of harassment they are concerned with a woman's assertiveness and work effectiveness, while men are more concerned with the psychological state of the woman and how provocative she is when they think about victims of sexual harassment. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.",
author = "Hurt, {Linda E.} and Wiener, {Richard L.} and Russell, {Brenda L.} and Mannen, {R. Kelley}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<413::AID-BSL364>3.0.CO;2-B",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "413--433",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace. / Hurt, Linda E.; Wiener, Richard L.; Russell, Brenda L.; Mannen, R. Kelley.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1999, p. 413-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace

AU - Hurt, Linda E.

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Russell, Brenda L.

AU - Mannen, R. Kelley

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Qualitative interviews exploring gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment were conducted with 100 full-time St. Louis area employees. Women more than men reported that telling dirty/sexual jokes was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when they happened in the workplace, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when the man's intentions were not harmful. Men more than women reported that requesting a date was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when the woman did not welcome the behavior, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when they did not violate workplace norms. Logistic regression analysis predicted the respondent gender with 86% accuracy. Finally, concept mapping suggested that when women think about harassers they are concerned with power and social aptitude, while men seem to be more concerned about the responsibility and psychological adjustment of perpetrators of sexual harassment. When women think about victims of harassment they are concerned with a woman's assertiveness and work effectiveness, while men are more concerned with the psychological state of the woman and how provocative she is when they think about victims of sexual harassment. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

AB - Qualitative interviews exploring gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment were conducted with 100 full-time St. Louis area employees. Women more than men reported that telling dirty/sexual jokes was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when they happened in the workplace, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when the man's intentions were not harmful. Men more than women reported that requesting a date was a non-harassing behavior, qualified behaviors as harassing when the woman did not welcome the behavior, and considered behaviors as non-harassing when they did not violate workplace norms. Logistic regression analysis predicted the respondent gender with 86% accuracy. Finally, concept mapping suggested that when women think about harassers they are concerned with power and social aptitude, while men seem to be more concerned about the responsibility and psychological adjustment of perpetrators of sexual harassment. When women think about victims of harassment they are concerned with a woman's assertiveness and work effectiveness, while men are more concerned with the psychological state of the woman and how provocative she is when they think about victims of sexual harassment. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033387405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033387405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<413::AID-BSL364>3.0.CO;2-B

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<413::AID-BSL364>3.0.CO;2-B

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 413

EP - 433

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 4

ER -