Gendered Perceptions and Reelection Incentives in the U.S. House of Representatives

Nicholas Lafayette Pyeatt, Alixandra B. Yanus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the public systematically misperceives the ideology of female politicians. We posit that these misperceptions affect the ideal roll call ideology of female incumbents. Specifically, we contend that women receive greater benefits from more ideologically extreme roll call voting than comparable men. We test this theory by using data on the House of Representatives from 1972 to 2008. We find that even after accounting for district characteristics, female members are never penalized—at least in terms of facing a quality challenger—by ideological extremity. But extremity may increase male incumbents’ likelihood of facing such challengers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-315
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Women, Politics and Policy
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Fingerprint

ideology
incentive
test theory
voting
politician
district

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{3c0678fe9bb7418bb0ff03572710f835,
title = "Gendered Perceptions and Reelection Incentives in the U.S. House of Representatives",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that the public systematically misperceives the ideology of female politicians. We posit that these misperceptions affect the ideal roll call ideology of female incumbents. Specifically, we contend that women receive greater benefits from more ideologically extreme roll call voting than comparable men. We test this theory by using data on the House of Representatives from 1972 to 2008. We find that even after accounting for district characteristics, female members are never penalized—at least in terms of facing a quality challenger—by ideological extremity. But extremity may increase male incumbents’ likelihood of facing such challengers.",
author = "Pyeatt, {Nicholas Lafayette} and Yanus, {Alixandra B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/1554477X.2016.1188594",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "295--315",
journal = "Journal of Women, Politics and Policy",
issn = "1554-477X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Gendered Perceptions and Reelection Incentives in the U.S. House of Representatives. / Pyeatt, Nicholas Lafayette; Yanus, Alixandra B.

In: Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, Vol. 37, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 295-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gendered Perceptions and Reelection Incentives in the U.S. House of Representatives

AU - Pyeatt, Nicholas Lafayette

AU - Yanus, Alixandra B.

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - Previous research has shown that the public systematically misperceives the ideology of female politicians. We posit that these misperceptions affect the ideal roll call ideology of female incumbents. Specifically, we contend that women receive greater benefits from more ideologically extreme roll call voting than comparable men. We test this theory by using data on the House of Representatives from 1972 to 2008. We find that even after accounting for district characteristics, female members are never penalized—at least in terms of facing a quality challenger—by ideological extremity. But extremity may increase male incumbents’ likelihood of facing such challengers.

AB - Previous research has shown that the public systematically misperceives the ideology of female politicians. We posit that these misperceptions affect the ideal roll call ideology of female incumbents. Specifically, we contend that women receive greater benefits from more ideologically extreme roll call voting than comparable men. We test this theory by using data on the House of Representatives from 1972 to 2008. We find that even after accounting for district characteristics, female members are never penalized—at least in terms of facing a quality challenger—by ideological extremity. But extremity may increase male incumbents’ likelihood of facing such challengers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977138012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977138012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1188594

DO - 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1188594

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 295

EP - 315

JO - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

JF - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

SN - 1554-477X

IS - 3

ER -